The 2023 AutoBild Allrad tyre test, conducted using a BMW X3, displayed various tyres' performance in numerous categories. Auto Bild tested the popular 225/60 R18 SUV / CUV crossover size and also included a summer tyre as reference.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 0 km/h
Wet Braking: 100 → 0 km/h

Dry

In dry conditions, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV were top performers in braking and handling respectively.

Dry Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	38.5 m	-2.40 m
1Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	40.9 m	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	41.3 m	+0.40 m
3Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	41.4 m	+0.50 m
4Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	41.5 m	+0.60 m
5Vredestein Wintrac Pro	41.6 m	+0.70 m
6Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	41.7 m	+0.80 m
6Superia Bluewin SUV 2	41.7 m	+0.80 m
8Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	41.8 m	+0.90 m
9Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	42.8 m	+1.90 m
10Firestone Winterhawk 4	43.4 m	+2.50 m

The difference between best and worst was 12.7% (4.9 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	96.4 km/h	+1.80 km/h
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	94.6 km/h	Best
2Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	94.3 km/h	-0.30 km/h
3Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	94.1 km/h	-0.50 km/h
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	93.9 km/h	-0.70 km/h
4Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	93.9 km/h	-0.70 km/h
6Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	93.8 km/h	-0.80 km/h
7Superia Bluewin SUV 2	93.7 km/h	-0.90 km/h
8Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	93.6 km/h	-1.00 km/h
9Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	93.2 km/h	-1.40 km/h
10Firestone Winterhawk 4	92 km/h	-2.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (4.4 Km/H).

Wet

For wet conditions, Pirelli's Scorpion Winter 2 excelled in braking while Goodyear's UltraGrip Performance Plus SUV showed superior handling. Bridgestone's Blizzak LM005 dominated in wet circle, straight aqua, and curved aquaplaning tests.

Wet Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	41.1 m	Best	0 km/h
2Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	42.9 m	+1.80 m	27 km/h
RefReference Summer	43.1 m	+2.00 m	28 km/h
3Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	43.1 m	+2.00 m	28 km/h
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	43.6 m	+2.50 m	31 km/h
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	44.5 m	+3.40 m	36 km/h
6Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	44.6 m	+3.50 m	36 km/h
7Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	44.9 m	+3.80 m	38 km/h
8Firestone Winterhawk 4	45.2 m	+4.10 m	39 km/h
9Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	45.8 m	+4.70 m	42 km/h
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	51.6 m	+10.50 m	59 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 25.5% (10.5 m ≈ 2.3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Superia Bluewin SUV 2 would still be travelling at 59 km/h when the Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	84.3 km/h	Best
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	83.6 km/h	-0.70 km/h
3Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	83.5 km/h	-0.80 km/h
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	83.1 km/h	-1.20 km/h
5Vredestein Wintrac Pro	83 km/h	-1.30 km/h
6Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	82.9 km/h	-1.40 km/h
7Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	82.8 km/h	-1.50 km/h
7Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	82.8 km/h	-1.50 km/h
RefReference Summer	82.6 km/h	-1.70 km/h
9Firestone Winterhawk 4	82.4 km/h	-1.90 km/h
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	78.9 km/h	-5.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6.4% (5.4 Km/H).

Wet Circle
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	15.89 s	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	15.95 s	+0.06 s
RefReference Summer	16.02 s	+0.13 s
3Vredestein Wintrac Pro	16.07 s	+0.18 s
4Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	16.11 s	+0.22 s
4Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	16.11 s	+0.22 s
6Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	16.14 s	+0.25 s
7Firestone Winterhawk 4	16.15 s	+0.26 s
8Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	16.17 s	+0.28 s
9Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	16.2 s	+0.31 s
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	16.89 s	+1.00 s

The difference between best and worst was 6.3% (1 s).

Straight Aqua
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	90.6 km/h	Best
2Firestone Winterhawk 4	89 km/h	-1.60 km/h
RefReference Summer	87.4 km/h	-3.20 km/h
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	87.3 km/h	-3.30 km/h
4Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	86.7 km/h	-3.90 km/h
5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	85.4 km/h	-5.20 km/h
6Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	85.1 km/h	-5.50 km/h
7Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	84.9 km/h	-5.70 km/h
8Vredestein Wintrac Pro	84.7 km/h	-5.90 km/h
9Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	79.6 km/h	-11.00 km/h
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	76.3 km/h	-14.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (14.3 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	4.71 m/sec2	Best
2Firestone Winterhawk 4	4.51 m/sec2	-0.20 m/sec2
3Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	4.42 m/sec2	-0.29 m/sec2
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	4.35 m/sec2	-0.36 m/sec2
RefReference Summer	4.32 m/sec2	-0.39 m/sec2
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	4.2 m/sec2	-0.51 m/sec2
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	4.12 m/sec2	-0.59 m/sec2
7Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	4.02 m/sec2	-0.69 m/sec2
8Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	3.73 m/sec2	-0.98 m/sec2
9Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	3.63 m/sec2	-1.08 m/sec2
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	3.04 m/sec2	-1.67 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 35.5% (1.67 m/sec2).

Snow

In snowy conditions, Hankook, Michelin, and Firestone had notable performances in braking, traction, and handling respectively.

Snow Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	21.9 m	Best	0 km/h
2Firestone Winterhawk 4	22 m	+0.10 m	9 km/h
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	22.3 m	+0.40 m	17 km/h
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	22.4 m	+0.50 m	19 km/h
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	22.4 m	+0.50 m	19 km/h
4Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	22.4 m	+0.50 m	19 km/h
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	22.5 m	+0.60 m	21 km/h
8Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	22.8 m	+0.90 m	26 km/h
9Superia Bluewin SUV 2	23.1 m	+1.20 m	30 km/h
10Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	23.3 m	+1.40 m	32 km/h
RefReference Summer	48.8 m	+26.90 m	97 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 122.8% (26.9 m ≈ 6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 32 km/h when the Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	3327 N	Best
2Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	3275 N	-52.00 N
3Firestone Winterhawk 4	3272 N	-55.00 N
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	3200 N	-127.00 N
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	3188 N	-139.00 N
6Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	3160 N	-167.00 N
7Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	3154 N	-173.00 N
8Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	3136 N	-191.00 N
9Superia Bluewin SUV 2	3070 N	-257.00 N
10Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	3031 N	-296.00 N
RefReference Summer	970 N	-2,357.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 70.8% (2,357 N).

Snow Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Firestone Winterhawk 4	57.9 km/h	Best
2Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	56.4 km/h	-1.50 km/h
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	56.1 km/h	-1.80 km/h
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	55.5 km/h	-2.40 km/h
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	55.5 km/h	-2.40 km/h
6Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	55.4 km/h	-2.50 km/h
7Superia Bluewin SUV 2	55 km/h	-2.90 km/h
8Vredestein Wintrac Pro	54.7 km/h	-3.20 km/h
9Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	53.4 km/h	-4.50 km/h
10Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	52.9 km/h	-5.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (5 Km/H).

Snow Slalom
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Firestone Winterhawk 4	4.99 m/sec2	Best
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	4.9 m/sec2	-0.09 m/sec2
3Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	4.84 m/sec2	-0.15 m/sec2
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	4.82 m/sec2	-0.17 m/sec2
5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	4.81 m/sec2	-0.18 m/sec2
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	4.8 m/sec2	-0.19 m/sec2
7Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	4.76 m/sec2	-0.23 m/sec2
8Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	4.55 m/sec2	-0.44 m/sec2
9Superia Bluewin SUV 2	4.52 m/sec2	-0.47 m/sec2
10Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	4.43 m/sec2	-0.56 m/sec2
RefReference Summer	2.29 m/sec2	-2.70 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 54.1% (2.7 m/sec2).

Comfort

Michelin's tyre also showcased the lowest noise levels.

Noise
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	71.9 dB	Best
2Firestone Winterhawk 4	72.7 dB	+0.80 dB
3Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	72.8 dB	+0.90 dB
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	73 dB	+1.10 dB
5Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	73.1 dB	+1.20 dB
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	73.3 dB	+1.40 dB
7Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	73.8 dB	+1.90 dB
8Superia Bluewin SUV 2	73.9 dB	+2.00 dB
9Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	74.1 dB	+2.20 dB
RefReference Summer	74.4 dB	+2.50 dB
10Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	74.6 dB	+2.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (2.7 dB).

Value

The Continental's WinterContact TS 870 P demonstrated lowest rolling resistance, albeit at a higher price point.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
RefReference Summer	5.97 kg/t	-0.40 kg/t	£0
1Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	6.37 kg/t	Best	£0
2Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	6.98 kg/t	+0.61 kg/t	£42
3Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	7.43 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t	£73
3Superia Bluewin SUV 2	7.43 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t	£73
5Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	7.63 kg/t	+1.26 kg/t	£87
6Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	7.66 kg/t	+1.29 kg/t	£89
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	7.8 kg/t	+1.43 kg/t	£99
8Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	7.93 kg/t	+1.56 kg/t	£108
9Firestone Winterhawk 4	7.99 kg/t	+1.62 kg/t	£112
10Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	8.39 kg/t	+2.02 kg/t	£140

The difference between best and worst was 40.5% (2.42 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV uses about 96 L (£140) more fuel than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Petrol/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

19,000 km

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

£1.45/L

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

The overall results highlight the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV as the top performers. The Continental demonstrated a commendable balance of performance across various tests, ensuring a high level of safety and handling in different weather conditions, and the Michelin proved to be a specialist in snow with excellent handling in all weathers and a pleasantly quiet rolling comfort, despite its high rolling resistance. Following closely were the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV and Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2, both praised for their handling qualities across different conditions. Goodyear showcased exemplary wet handling, while Pirelli was lauded for its consistently high performance level and precise handling, especially in snow and wet conditions

Dry98.8%

Wet95.6%

Snow96.5%

Comfort97%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	41.8 m	+0.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	94.3 km/h	-0.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	44.5 m	+3.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	83.1 km/h	-1.20 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	9^th / 10	16.2 s	+0.31 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 10	84.9 km/h	-5.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 10	4.2 m/sec2	-0.51 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	22.4 m	+0.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 10	3188 N	-139.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	55.5 km/h	-2.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	4^th / 10	4.82 m/sec2	-0.17 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 10	74.1 dB	+2.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 10	6.37 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: B/B/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 865.00

Dry99.3%

Wet95.6%

Snow98.3%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance75.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	41.5 m	+0.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	94.6 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	44.9 m	+3.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	83.6 km/h	-0.70 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	4^th / 10	16.11 s	+0.22 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 10	87.3 km/h	-3.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 10	4.02 m/sec2	-0.69 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	22.3 m	+0.40 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 10	3327 N	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	56.1 km/h	-1.80 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	2^nd / 10	4.9 m/sec2	-0.09 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 10	71.9 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 10	8.39 kg/t	+2.02 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/68
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 780.00

Dry99%

Wet96.7%

Snow96%

Comfort98.5%

Rolling Resistance85.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	41.3 m	+0.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	93.6 km/h	-1.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	44.6 m	+3.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	84.3 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	2^nd / 10	15.95 s	+0.06 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 10	85.4 km/h	-5.20 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 10	4.35 m/sec2	-0.36 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	22.4 m	+0.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	8^th / 10	3136 N	-191.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	55.5 km/h	-2.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	5^th / 10	4.81 m/sec2	-0.18 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 10	73 dB	+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	7.43 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t

EU Label: C/C/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 785.00

Dry99%

Wet97.3%

Snow95.9%

Comfort98.4%

Rolling Resistance83.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	41.4 m	+0.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	93.9 km/h	-0.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	41.1 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	82.9 km/h	-1.40 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	4^th / 10	16.11 s	+0.22 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 10	85.1 km/h	-5.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8^th / 10	3.73 m/sec2	-0.98 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	22.4 m	+0.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	3154 N	-173.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	55.4 km/h	-2.50 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	7^th / 10	4.76 m/sec2	-0.23 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 10	73.1 dB	+1.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 10	7.63 kg/t	+1.26 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 800.00

Dry98.8%

Wet96.2%

Snow96%

Comfort98.1%

Rolling Resistance81.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	41.6 m	+0.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	93.9 km/h	-0.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	43.6 m	+2.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	83 km/h	-1.30 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	3^rd / 10	16.07 s	+0.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 10	84.7 km/h	-5.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6^th / 10	4.12 m/sec2	-0.59 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	22.5 m	+0.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 10	3200 N	-127.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	54.7 km/h	-3.20 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	6^th / 10	4.8 m/sec2	-0.19 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 10	73.3 dB	+1.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 10	7.8 kg/t	+1.43 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 670.00

Dry97%

Wet97%

Snow98.2%

Comfort96.4%

Rolling Resistance83.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	42.8 m	+1.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	93.2 km/h	-1.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	42.9 m	+1.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	82.8 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	8^th / 10	16.17 s	+0.28 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 10	86.7 km/h	-3.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3^rd / 10	4.42 m/sec2	-0.29 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	21.9 m	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 10	3275 N	-52.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	56.4 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	3^rd / 10	4.84 m/sec2	-0.15 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 10	74.6 dB	+2.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 10	7.66 kg/t	+1.29 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 630.00

Dry99.7%

Wet93.6%

Snow92.8%

Comfort98.8%

Rolling Resistance80.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	40.9 m	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	94.1 km/h	-0.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	45.8 m	+4.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	82.8 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	6^th / 10	16.14 s	+0.25 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 10	79.6 km/h	-11.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9^th / 10	3.63 m/sec2	-1.08 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	22.8 m	+0.90 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	6^th / 10	3160 N	-167.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	52.9 km/h	-5.00 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10^th / 10	4.43 m/sec2	-0.56 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 10	72.8 dB	+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 10	7.93 kg/t	+1.56 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/70
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 545.00

Dry98.6%

Wet98.4%

Snow92.1%

Comfort97.4%

Rolling Resistance91.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	41.7 m	+0.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	93.8 km/h	-0.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	43.1 m	+2.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	83.5 km/h	-0.80 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	1^st / 10	15.89 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 10	90.6 km/h	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 10	4.71 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	23.3 m	+1.40 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	10^th / 10	3031 N	-296.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	53.4 km/h	-4.50 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	8^th / 10	4.55 m/sec2	-0.44 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 10	73.8 dB	+1.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 10	6.98 kg/t	+0.61 kg/t

EU Label: B/A/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 745.00

Dry95.7%

Wet95.8%

Snow99.5%

Comfort98.9%

Rolling Resistance79.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	43.4 m	+2.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	92 km/h	-2.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	45.2 m	+4.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	82.4 km/h	-1.90 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	7^th / 10	16.15 s	+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 10	89 km/h	-1.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 10	4.51 m/sec2	-0.20 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	22 m	+0.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 10	3272 N	-55.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	57.9 km/h	Best in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1^st / 10	4.99 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 10	72.7 dB	+0.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 10	7.99 kg/t	+1.62 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 585.00

Dry98.6%

Wet87%

Snow93.2%

Comfort97.3%

Rolling Resistance85.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	41.7 m	+0.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	93.7 km/h	-0.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	51.6 m	+10.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	78.9 km/h	-5.40 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	10^th / 10	16.89 s	+1.00 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 10	76.3 km/h	-14.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	10^th / 10	3.04 m/sec2	-1.67 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	23.1 m	+1.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	9^th / 10	3070 N	-257.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	55 km/h	-2.90 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	9^th / 10	4.52 m/sec2	-0.47 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	8^th / 10	73.9 dB	+2.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	7.43 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t

EU Label: C/C/70
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 350.00

Menu

Tyre shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test