Data Explorer / Tire Rack
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test
- Tested size
- 275/35 R19
- Tyres tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 9
- Test vehicle
- BMW M2
Set the weightings
Move a slider. The other categories rebalance automatically to keep the total at 100%.
No test-specific category weights are recorded; this starts with season defaults.
Season defaults
Results
Movement is compared with the default calculation, not the published finishing order. Scores use unrounded totals for ranking.
No ranking for this setup. Give at least one category a positive weight and include a discipline in each active category, or reset the weights.
Filtering never changes the benchmark, scores or positions.
No tyres selected. Add tyres to your shortlist to focus the ranking.
| m ↓ | s ↓ | g ↑ | Points ↑ | Points ↑ | m ↓ | s ↓ | Points ↑ | g ↑ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 97.63 | 32.1 | 28.75 | 0.98 | 8.13 | 7.83 | 97.4 | 40.4 | 30.52 | 8.00 | 0.88 | 97.8 | |
StrengthsThe Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 has the third-shortest wet braking, the third-fastest wet handling lap and the top road rating. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.41 × 41% = 39.94 Wet97.79 × 59% = 57.7 | ||||||||||||||
| 2 | 2 | 98.72 | 30.9 | 28.58 | 0.98 | 8.13 | 7.17 | 98.2 | 40.8 | 30.08 | 8.81 | 0.89 | 99.1 | |
StrengthsThe Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has the shortest dry braking, the fastest wet handling lap and the second-fastest dry handling lap. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.19 × 41% = 40.26 Wet99.09 × 59% = 58.46 | ||||||||||||||
| 3 | 1 | 99.12 | 31.0 | 28.19 | 1.01 | 8.19 | 7.42 | 99.6 | 39.6 | 30.26 | 8.13 | 0.88 | 98.8 | |
StrengthsThe Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 has the shortest wet braking, the fastest dry handling lap and the second-shortest dry braking. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry99.59 × 41% = 40.83 Wet98.79 × 59% = 58.29 | ||||||||||||||
| 4 | 7 | 93.28 | 33.0 | 29.34 | 0.96 | 7.00 | 7.58 | 94.5 | 43.0 | 31.84 | 7.44 | 0.83 | 92.5 | |
StrengthsThe Vredestein Ultrac Pro has the second-highest road rating. ConsiderationsIt has the third-longest dry braking and the third-slowest dry handling lap. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry94.46 × 41% = 38.73 Wet92.47 × 59% = 54.56 | ||||||||||||||
| 5 | 4 | 95.14 | 31.4 | 28.62 | 1.00 | 8.00 | 7.08 | 98.1 | 43.9 | 31.18 | 7.38 | 0.85 | 93.1 | |
StrengthsThe Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has the third-shortest dry braking, the third-fastest dry handling lap and the second-best dry circle grip. ConsiderationsIt has the third-longest wet braking and the third-lowest wet handling rating. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.09 × 41% = 40.22 Wet93.1 × 59% = 54.93 | ||||||||||||||
| 6 | 6 | 94.51 | 32.3 | 28.82 | 0.98 | 7.88 | 6.83 | 96.2 | 43.0 | 31.39 | 7.88 | 0.83 | 93.3 | |
StrengthsThe Toyo Proxes Sport 2 has the joint third-best dry circle grip. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry96.21 × 41% = 39.45 Wet93.32 × 59% = 55.06 | ||||||||||||||
| 7 | 5 | 94.87 | 32.9 | 29.03 | 0.95 | 7.19 | 6.83 | 94.1 | 40.3 | 31.44 | 7.75 | 0.84 | 95.4 | |
StrengthsThe Falken Azenis FK510 has the second-shortest wet braking. ConsiderationsIt has the third-worst dry circle grip. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry94.12 × 41% = 38.59 Wet95.39 × 59% = 56.28 | ||||||||||||||
| 8 | 8 | 92.52 | 32.8 | 29.08 | 0.96 | 7.25 | 6.58 | 94.3 | 44.0 | 32.06 | 7.44 | 0.82 | 91.3 | |
ConsiderationsThe BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA has the second-longest wet braking, the third-slowest wet handling lap and the third-worst wet circle grip. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry94.29 × 41% = 38.66 Wet91.29 × 59% = 53.86 | ||||||||||||||
| 9 | 9 | 91.09 | 34.3 | 29.55 | 0.94 | 6.69 | 6.75 | 91.8 | 41.9 | 32.69 | 6.94 | 0.79 | 90.6 | |
ConsiderationsThe Sumitomo HTR Z5 has the second-longest dry braking and the second-slowest dry and wet handling laps. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry91.76 × 41% = 37.62 Wet90.62 × 59% = 53.47 | ||||||||||||||
| 10 | 10 | 86.49 | 34.8 | 30.01 | 0.92 | 6.44 | 6.33 | 89.9 | 49.7 | 33.86 | 6.69 | 0.77 | 84.1 | |
ConsiderationsThe Nitto NT555 G2 has the longest dry and wet braking and the slowest dry and wet handling laps. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry89.86 × 41% = 36.84 Wet84.14 × 59% = 49.64 | ||||||||||||||
Raw results do not change when you move the sliders. Scroll horizontally to see every discipline.
Leading with these priorities
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02
These are calculated scenarios, not new test awards. The published verdict may reflect judgement, close results and factors outside this calculation.
Not ranked: a measurement needed for these weights is missing. Missing results are not treated as zero or redistributed.
Reference tyres provide context only. They do not set the benchmark and cannot win the personalised ranking.
Weighting vs real impact
What decides this ranking
The weighting is how much each category counts. The real impact is how much of the difference between the tyres it creates: a discipline in which every tyre performed about the same barely changes the order, however much it counts.
No weighting is recorded for this test, so the weighting here starts from Tyre Reviews’ season defaults, not from the test’s own scoring.
- Dry Weighting 41% Real impact 32%
- Wet Weighting 59% Real impact 68%
- Subj. Dry Handling counts for 2.5% of the score but creates 6% of the difference between the tyres, because their results in it were far apart.
- Dry Handling counts for 11.9% of the score but creates only 5% of the difference, because most tyres performed about the same in it.
Every discipline 9
| Discipline | Weighting | Real impact |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 12.3% | 10% |
| Dry Handling | 11.9% | 5% |
| Dry Circle | 11.9% | 7% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 2.5% | 6% |
| Subj. Road Score | 2.5% | 4% |
| Wet Braking | 18.3% | 26% |
| Wet Handling | 17.7% | 15% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 5.3% | 7% |
| Wet Circle | 17.7% | 20% |
How it is worked out: each discipline’s weighting is multiplied by the spread of its results (the gap across the middle half of the tyres, as a percentage of the best result), then shared out so that all the disciplines add up to 100%. It estimates what separates the tyres; it is not a second set of weights, and it follows the weights you set.
How your ranking is calculated
Each discipline is scored against the best non-reference tyre in the full test field: best ÷ result × 100 when lower is better, or result ÷ best × 100 when higher is better. Discipline scores are rounded to two decimal places, then combined using your weights.
Within-category weights divide that category’s share of the overall score. A 50% wet category and 40% wet-braking share give wet braking 20% of the total. A weight is a scoring priority, not a measure of its actual effect on the ranking: the performance gaps matter too. What decides this ranking ↑
Published joint positions are preserved separately. Calculated positions tie only when their underlying scores match; two displayed scores can look equal after rounding.
A zero weight excludes that category or discipline. At least one active discipline is required, and the disciplines in every active category must have a positive total.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test
255/45 R199 tyres tested
3 of these 10 tyres tested again
2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test
255/35 R198 tyres tested
3 of these 10 tyres tested again
2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
245/45 R1920 tyres tested
3 of these 10 tyres tested again