Menu

Hifly H/T601

The Hifly HT601 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.4
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
74%
Wet Grip
60%
Road Feedback
58%
Handling
52%
Wear
52%
Comfort
56%
Buy again
42%
5 Reviews
56% Average
96,000 miles driven
Hifly HT601

Hifly HT601

Summer Budget
BETA
6.4 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 56.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.93
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Hifly HT601

Questions and Answers for the Hifly HT601

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Hifly HT601. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Hifly HT601 Reviews

Given 100% while driving a Toyota Landcruiser (265/75 R16) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
Best cheap tyres ever ! Bought from new and used in combination of asphalt and offroad, rocks, dirt gravel, mud, more than 30k kms and it.s like new. Must buy again. And it.s very light and my car have a priceless fuel consumption.
Ask a question | Helpful 773
March 10, 2021
Given 23% while driving a Toyota Landcruiser (245/70 R16 N) on mostly country roads for 36,000 easy going miles
Bought 4 new tyres for my land cruiser VX and was promised good milage. After less than 30 000km most of the tyres are worn close to replacement. Tyres were quiet when new but as they got older the noise increased to a point where it now sounds like I have mud tyres. Pieces of tyre also coming off in small chunks and bastard to balance. Willl never buy again.
November 1, 2018
Given 48% while driving a Nissan patrol (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 15,000 easy going miles
Disappointed. Rear Vigorous MT tyre delaminated and blew out after about 18 months and about 20,000km. That makes a cheap tyre more expensive than a reputable brand expensive tyre which come with warranty.
January 31, 2016
Have you driven on the Hifly HT601 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Hifly HT601? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Hifly HT601 >

Latest Hifly HT601 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Ford 350 box truck (225/75 R16) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
nice tire for the price . i had a set of michelins on my truck wore out after 25,000 mi. piece of crap for the money they charge. hi fly just as good if not better.half the price
January 13, 2015