Menu

Nokian W+

The Nokian W+ is a High Performance Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

The quick answer

Owners say 68% from 15 owner reviews 64% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say Sorry, we don't currently have any test data for the Nokian W+

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tyre - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated September 2020.

  • 15owner reviews
  • 144,900miles driven

Tyre Reviews Score

Nokian W+

6.6/10

From owner reviews only: no measured test results yet.

  • Limited Confidence
  • 15 owner reviews

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent testsNo measured test results yet – 0%
Owner reviews15 owner reviews · rated 68% 34% 50%
Typical tyreWhere every score starts before its own data counts – 50%
Combined 41% 6.6

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Owner reviews decide 50% of this score. The other 50% is the typical starting point, and it shrinks as more reviews arrive.

Scored on owner reviews alone, a tyre is High once the reviews decide 90% or more, and Medium from 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as reviews arrive.

All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Nokian W+

Frequently Asked Questions
How comfortable and quiet are the Nokian W+?
Owners rate the Nokian W+ 8.2 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 13 reviews.
How well do the Nokian W+ wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Nokian W+ 8.6 out of 10 for wear across 13 reviews. 3 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 5,000 miles.
Would owners buy the Nokian W+ again?
64% of owners say they would buy the Nokian W+ again, based on the 14 owner reviews that answered the question. 14% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Nokian W+'s snow traction?
Of the 13 owner reviews analysed for the Nokian W+, 8 mention snow traction: 6 praise it (strong snow traction) and 2 criticise it (weak snow traction). One owner wrote: "the tyres performed very well in snow/ice conditions". Read those reviews
Owner Questions
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Nokian W+

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nokian W+. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Nokian W+ Owner Reviews

Review this tyre

What owners say

Across 15 owner ratings the Nokian W+ averages 68%. Owners rate Wear highest at 8.6 out of 10 and Ice Grip lowest at 4.3. 3 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 69% of owners score it 70% or better.

Owner ratings averaged from 15 ratings

  • Owner score 68%
  • Wear 86%
  • Comfort 82%
  • Dry Grip 77%
  • Wet Grip 70%
  • Road Feedback 69%
  • Handling 68%
  • Snow Grip 55%
  • Ice Grip 43%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 69%

“I originally got this tire for Suzuki Swift. It is a bit loud and tends to shake on dry roads. The car is consuming a bit of fuel. It adheres very well on wet and snowy roads and is easy to handle with the icy road. The...”

  • Suzuki Swift
  • 43,400 miles
Read full review → 918 found this helpful
Most critical 40%

“I experience a lot of under steering with this tires. This winter we didn`t have a lot of snow here in Bulgaria. You probably know when it is foggy outside how the roads get wet. On this wet roads those tires are pure...”

  • SEAT Cordoba Vario 1.4MPI 60HP
  • 3,500 miles
Read full review → 671 found this helpful
Longest term 89%

“I've just removed these tyres after using them for the fourth winter in succession - they are a great winter tyre that doesn't fall away in performance when the ambient temperature rises. I've been just as happy this...”

  • Audi A3 Sportback
  • 32,000 miles
Read full review → 680 found this helpful

All 13 Nokian W+ reviews

Score spread across 13 written reviews
40%
Member
Poor at wet roads especialy on turns. Will never buy again, i had few really unpleasynt situations I've never had with other brands.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 6
  • Wet Grip 1
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 1
  • Ice Grip 1
Helpful 999
69%
Member
I originally got this tire for Suzuki Swift. It is a bit loud and tends to shake on dry roads. The car is consuming a bit of fuel. It adheres very well on wet and snowy roads and is easy to handle with the icy road. The tires wear slowly. I wouldn't buy it again, but I would recommend it to everyone because it is an excellent winter tire.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 6
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 5
  • Snow Grip 7
  • Ice Grip 7
Helpful 918
70%
Member
It's my first time every driving in snow, bought a car with these already on so I gave it a chance. Well in sweden we got a lot of snow and ice, I don't feel comfort at all in the snow-muddy curves or on straight lines because u feel the tires lose its grip on mud. One day I came behind a snow plow truck and went uphill, when the plower drove off and I could gas up a little - the f*cking tires wouldn't get a grip so my fiance had to push the car up until I got a grip on the road.. I know I drove a bit slow up but still . Well maybe I need other tires or maybe it's normal when it's a lot of snow, I have to experience more winters with different tires to know. But when the road is dry I do feel a real comfort and safety in the tires because then you really feel the grip on the road, just a bit noisy on the highway but maybe just my car :-) and it's not the pattern that is bad, actually the look brand new.
Saab 9-3 2008
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Snow Grip 4
  • Ice Grip 5
Helpful 855

Which tyres do you drive?

Researching the Nokian W+? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Nokian W+?
74%
Member
  • Volvo S40
  • 195/60 R15
  • 4,000 miles
  • Mostly Town
  • Easy Going
Previously had Nokian WR for four winter seasons and they were excellent. Last autumn bought W+ since they were significantly cheaper. Unfortunately, the difference is also significant. In wet conditions traction on W+ is poor, and they just don't give you enough confidence for driving in winter conditions. In snow they were good, but not excellent. (Not that it should matter a lot, tyres were made in Russia - something I noticed after I bought them.)
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 4
Helpful 698
81%
Member
I've had these tyres for almost a season during which I took a trip to Austria and I gotta say, the tyres performed very well in snow/ice conditions. I didn't pushed them to the limit in the wet, but the overall feedback was ok.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 7
Helpful 630
89%
Member
I've just removed these tyres after using them for the fourth winter in succession - they are a great winter tyre that doesn't fall away in performance when the ambient temperature rises. I've been just as happy this winter with its warm wet weather (and recent dry spell) as in previous winters where freezing temps and snow was more common in the Brecon Beacons. I've now completed over 32k miles in total on them and they still show 4mm of tread - maybe not ideal for another extreme winter but I'll refit them come November for the added security the compound and tread pattern give on greasy leave strewn roads and frosty mornings. My fuel economy is consistently 10% better on these tyres than my normal (wider) summer wheel set so they've probably paid for themselves in fuel savings, never mind the reduced wear on the more expensive summer performance tyres.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 680
40%
Member
I experience a lot of under steering with this tires. This winter we didn`t have a lot of snow here in Bulgaria. You probably know when it is foggy outside how the roads get wet. On this wet roads those tires are pure garbage.
Last weekend I almost hit a tree while cornering with less than 40 km/h. The temperature was 9 degrees C , so it was not icy.
Would not recommend even to my worst enemy!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 5
  • Wet Grip 2
  • Road Feedback 2
  • Handling 2
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 671
76%
Member
Since 2009 winter (december) I had Nokian all WRG2s as winter tyres. They performed very very well. As I live near baltic sea, eastern Europe I managed to drive into very different winter conditions: snow, mud, ice, wet, dry cold.. All separate and sometimes combined. Unfortunately one tyre got flat because of damage I made for it in August of 2012. So I got a pair of W+ the last autumn to put on front because. Two WRG2s are made softer than W+ so I left them in the back as those still had 5mm of pattern. From first drives I felt the difference between W+ and G2. As the government rules says that we are ought to drive winter tyres since November 10th I did a lot kms on dry and wet and felt that W+ slips when starting more agressively, on wet it performs well, but it feels irresponsive. You can feel some hysteresis between wheel turn and car movement. This isn't an issue with summer(Michelin energy saver) or G2 tyres. But since December 2012 we had a lot of snow till April 2013 and I drove a lot in outlying roads with a lot snow and a lot of compressed snow. And there W+ performed impressively well. I was very comfortable to drive with them as I felt the traction and stability all the time. As those tyres are made from harder rub than G2 they still have 8mm mark on them (I haven't changed W+ to summer tyres yet. They are still mounted on car). I remember that WRG2s didn't have the 8mm mark after using them the first winter. I assume that wear of W+ will be great.
So, I wouldn't recommend these tyres as winter tyres for moderate or low (wet, dry) winter regions as you could find better performing tyres. But if you have a lot of snow, precipitation and you are not agressive driver you should definately go for W+ as they are cheap and perform very well on snow, as I assume they were designed for. If you prefer to spend more for tyres or you want assurance in every driving condition you should look for WR D3 or WR G2. Those are better. Though wear is worse because of softness.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 6
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 7
Helpful 679
87%
Member
Thought I'd add another review since this is my third winter on the Nokian W+ in my Golf - they've now covered a total of 18,000 miles and continue to impress with their ability to just get on with. I rotate tyres back to front every year so the fronts are on the driven wheels for their second time. they still show 6mm+ of tread depth so will easily do this winter and next winter when ont he rear axle. Whilst snow and icy cold conditions haven't been prevelant so far this winter for me, I know I'm prepared. These tyres are still ca £65 each fitted which is the price I paid back in November 2010, so even more of a bargain given the way prices have risen generally.

Would recommend these to anyone with small/medium sized cars who wants a set of winter tyres that get on with the job and can more than cater with the fluctuating winter temperatures of the UK
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 674
91%
Member
This (2011-12) is the second winter this set of Nokians have been fitted to my Megane Sport Tourer dCi Dynamique Tom-Tom. The 195/65-15 Nokian tyres - on steel rims - were put on in place of the normal 205/55-16 Michelin-shod alloys for the winter season in early November expecting the usual harsh winter conditions... and nothing yet!
But last winter (2010-11) both car and tyres excelled in conditions that even had 4X4s and Audi quattro-equipped cars struggling for grip and traction!
Wear has been negligible after approximately 5,000 miles covered in two winters.
Noise levels are lower, and ride comfort is somewhat better than the original tyres... but this may, in part, be due to the deeper sidewalls of the Nokians over the Michelins.
Dry road grip isn't to the very high standards of the Michelins though... the Megane's traction control does occasionally have to kick-in on a particularly twisting hilly section of road on my daily travels.
That apart, I have no problem in recommending the Nokian W+ as a great winter tyre for central European-type winter driving conditions.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 651
69%
Member
  • Citroën C4
  • 205/55 R16 T
  • 3,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Average
Solid tyre, i have expected more from it. Not excellent on snow when you start agressively.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 7
Helpful 628
86%
Member
Have had these fitted to steel rims of my Mk6 Golf since November, having now covered almost 7k miles. They've been excellent in most conditions through winter, only the very warmest of winter days (10-11'C) have seen them feeling a little less grippy and a bit soft. I've driven in 8" of snow easily thsi winter, whereas last winter i was almost stranded in an inch with the original 225/45/17 Bridgestone RE050s (brand new at the time). Even whent he snow was compacted and iced over with -15'C tenmperatures the tyres didn't struggle at all, i haven't seen the traction control light once this year, last winter the system actually threw an error as it was working so hard to get me nowhere !
Comfort has been very good, but then moving back to 15" tryes with a high sidewall is bound to improve things over a 17" wheel with an inch less wall height.
Handling has been fine, winter conditions aren't great for sporty driving and these tyres have no claims to be sporty - driven in normal manner they've ahd all the grip thats been required and a fair safety margin left.
Noise - for such a blocky pattern with very deep tread (about 9.5mm when new) they've been remarkably quiet, long curve at speed such as motorway intersections produce a little extra noise, but hardly noticeable (even in a car as quiet as the Golf)
Wear - after 7k miles, the built in tread indicators show exactly 8mm on the front and over 8mm on the rear (first wear indicator is at 8mm). By rotating the tyres the wear would average out at about 1mm every 7k miles, which would give a life (down to 4mm) of around 40k miles in winter use, and a further 14k miles of potential warm weather use to see them wear down to 2mm.
Value for money - absolutely. For £50 a corner you can't go wrong as a winter tyre set, extra security and mobility in winter alone make then a good buy. No idea what they'd wear like in summer temperatures, but even if they wear faster they are still capable of great mileage for the money.
Will i buy again - I will always run winter and summer tyre sets going forward and when these wear out, probably after another 3 winters !, i'll look again at Nokian and compare the prices to the big brands ike Dunlop and continental. No doubt i'll go with Nokian again.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 601
Find your next tyre
All tyre tests
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.