Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Across tests, Goodyear tends to edge dry braking and deliver very balanced handling with low noise and competitive rolling resistance, taking two overall wins. Michelin counters with class-leading wet braking and outstanding straight-line aquaplaning resistance, plus strong mileage and SUV-tuned stability-also earning two overall victories. The result is a split decision that hinges on your priorities: razor-sharp dry stopping and value versus wet safety and longevity.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | two | |
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | two |
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV have an equal number of test wins. However, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Consistently shortest dry braking across all shared tests
- Balanced dry/wet handling with low pass-by noise
- Competitive rolling resistance and strong value scores
- Capable light off-road performance with solid sand/mud results
- Best-in-test wet braking and straight-line aquaplaning resistance
- Precise steering and confident wet handling
- Strong wear/mileage and durability for heavier SUVs
- Excellent gravel traction and overall wet safety reserves
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 1.58% less distance than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.84% faster around a lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scored 20% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV stopped the vehicle in 1.72% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was 1.24% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.45% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.24% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV floated at a 4.78% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV slipped out at a 1.06% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Gravel Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two gravel handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.68% faster around a lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Gravel Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Gravel Handling winner was calculated >>
Gravel Traction
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during two gravel traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had 9.39% better traction on gravel than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Gravel Traction: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Gravel Traction winner was calculated >>
Sand Traction
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one sand traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had 0.52% better traction in sand than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Sand Traction: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Sand Traction winner was calculated >>
Grass Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one grass traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had 17.27% better traction on grass than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Grass Traction: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Grass Traction winner was calculated >>
Grass Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one grass traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was 2.47% faster accelerating on grass than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Grass Traction: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Grass Traction winner was calculated >>
Mud Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one mud traction tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had 0.53% better traction in mud than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Mud Traction: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Mud Traction winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV performed equally well in subj. noise tests.
Best In Subj. Noise: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 1.08% quieter than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is predicted to cover 7.95% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 10.12% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 1.92% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Energy Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one energy consumption tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV used 4.25% less energy than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Energy Consumption: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Energy Consumption winner was calculated >>
Range
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one range tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 gives the vehicle a range of 0.5% kilometers than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.
Best In Range: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Range winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV lost 1.86% less particle wear matter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Across 160 driver reviews, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely praised for outstanding dry and wet grip, progressive and predictable handling, strong braking, and a surprisingly comfortable, quiet ride for a UHP tyre. Many users report improved confidence and everyday refinement versus previous tyres (including PS4/PS5, PZ4, and various runflats), with good value for money also noted. Minority complaints focus on faster wear and relatively low new tread depth, increased noise on rough asphalt, and a softer sidewall feel that can dull initial turn-in or feel floaty at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for performance-focused daily use.
Based on 173 reviews with an average rating of 86%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV generally praise its strong dry and wet grip, short braking distances, high-speed stability, and confidence-inspiring handling, often highlighting good aquaplaning resistance and a compliant ride. Many report excellent real-world performance on heavy SUVs and in challenging wet conditions. A notable minority cite elevated road noise (especially at highway speeds or as the tyre wears), faster-than-expected tread wear in some cases, and a high purchase price. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with performance outweighing these concerns for most users.
Based on 32 reviews with an average rating of 81%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tyres possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
If maximum wet security and SUV-centric robustness matter more, the Pilot Sport 4 SUV is the safer bet. It won both EV/SUV-focused tests in 2024-2025 on the strength of best-in-test wet braking and dominant straight aquaplaning, with precise steering and the best wear result. Expect a higher purchase price and, at times, slightly higher noise and rolling resistance, but excellent confidence in heavy rain and at motorway speeds.
Bottom line: Goodyear for value-driven drivers prioritizing dry braking and refinement; Michelin for SUV owners who put wet safety and longevity first.
Key Differences
- Dry braking: Goodyear leads in all four tests (e.g., 33.5 m vs 34.2 m in 2024 SUV test).
- Wet braking: Michelin wins 3 of 4 (e.g., 49.3 m vs 50.4 m in 2024 SUV test).
- Aquaplaning: Michelin dominates straight aquaplaning in all tests; curved results are mixed.
- Handling: Very close-Goodyear often faster on dry; Michelin frequently sharper subjectively and stronger in wet laps.
- Efficiency and cost: Goodyear posts lower rolling resistance in two tests and better value score; Michelin is pricier.
- Longevity: Michelin shows higher wear mileage (+8.6% in 2024 EV test).
Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Top Comparisons
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.