2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test

Below are all the data points for the 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Nokian WetProof
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Michelin Primacy 4
Pirelli CINTURATO P7
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Continental Premium Contact 5
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Giti GitiPremium H1
Nexen N Blue HD Plus
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Primacy 4 with a result of 36.1 M. The difference between best and worst was 8.1%.

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli CINTURATO P7 with a result of 9 Points. The difference between best and worst was 33.3%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian WetProof with a result of 35.4 M. The difference between best and worst was 10.8%.

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Turanza T005 with a result of 88.1 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 6%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 50%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Premium Contact 5 with a result of 80.5 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 6.7%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli CINTURATO P7 with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 40%.

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian WetProof with a result of 71.5 dB. The difference between best and worst was 4%.

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Primacy 4 with a result of 7.6 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 18.3%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
1 Nokian WetProof 0%
2 Bridgestone Turanza T005 0%
3 Michelin Primacy 4 0%
4 Pirelli CINTURATO P7 0%
5 Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 0%
6 Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 0%
7 Continental Premium Contact 5 0%
8 Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 0%
9 Giti GitiPremium H1 0%
10 Nexen N Blue HD Plus 0%
11 Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 0%
comments powered by Disqus