Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R17
Tyres tested
10
Disciplines
11

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
37.9 m -1.60 m
39.5 m Best
39.7 m +0.20 m
39.9 m +0.40 m
41.2 m +1.70 m
42 m +2.50 m
42.3 m +2.80 m
42.6 m +3.10 m
42.9 m +3.40 m
43.8 m +4.30 m
44.4 m +4.90 m
RefReference Winter
44.4 m +4.90 m

The difference between best and worst was 17.2% (6.5 m ≈ 1.4 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
86.3 km/h +0.60 km/h
85.7 km/h Best
85.1 km/h -0.60 km/h
84.6 km/h -1.10 km/h
84.4 km/h -1.30 km/h
84.4 km/h -1.30 km/h
84.2 km/h -1.50 km/h
RefReference Winter
84 km/h -1.70 km/h
83.4 km/h -2.30 km/h
83.3 km/h -2.40 km/h
83.1 km/h -2.60 km/h
82.5 km/h -3.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (3.8 Km/H).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
42.4 m -3.90 m
46.3 m Best
46.5 m +0.20 m
47.5 m +1.20 m
48.6 m +2.30 m
49.5 m +3.20 m
49.9 m +3.60 m
50.4 m +4.10 m
RefReference Winter
50.4 m +4.10 m
50.8 m +4.50 m
51 m +4.70 m
52.6 m +6.30 m

The difference between best and worst was 24.1% (10.2 m ≈ 2.3 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
72.6 km/h Best
RefReference Summer
71.6 km/h -1.00 km/h
71.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
71 km/h -1.60 km/h
70.9 km/h -1.70 km/h
70.8 km/h -1.80 km/h
70.6 km/h -2.00 km/h
RefReference Winter
70.5 km/h -2.10 km/h
70 km/h -2.60 km/h
69.3 km/h -3.30 km/h
68.7 km/h -3.90 km/h
66.2 km/h -6.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.8% (6.4 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
76.8 km/h +2.50 km/h
74.3 km/h Best
73.7 km/h -0.60 km/h
72.9 km/h -1.40 km/h
72.2 km/h -2.10 km/h
RefReference Winter
72.1 km/h -2.20 km/h
71.5 km/h -2.80 km/h
71 km/h -3.30 km/h
70.5 km/h -3.80 km/h
70.4 km/h -3.90 km/h
70 km/h -4.30 km/h
68.9 km/h -5.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 10.3% (7.9 Km/H).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
23.3 m -0.30 m
23.6 m Best
24.2 m +0.60 m
24.8 m +1.20 m
24.9 m +1.30 m
25.4 m +1.80 m
25.6 m +2.00 m
25.6 m +2.00 m
25.7 m +2.10 m
26.3 m +2.70 m
27.1 m +3.50 m
RefReference Summer
69.3 m +45.70 m

The difference between best and worst was 197.4% (46 m ≈ 10.2 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
56.9 km/h Best
56.7 km/h -0.20 km/h
RefReference Winter
56.7 km/h -0.20 km/h
56.6 km/h -0.30 km/h
56.1 km/h -0.80 km/h
56 km/h -0.90 km/h
55.9 km/h -1.00 km/h
55.7 km/h -1.20 km/h
55.1 km/h -1.80 km/h
55 km/h -1.90 km/h
54.8 km/h -2.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.1 Km/H).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
71.3 dB Best
71.8 dB +0.50 dB
71.9 dB +0.60 dB
72 dB +0.70 dB
72.1 dB +0.80 dB
72.4 dB +1.10 dB
72.7 dB +1.40 dB
RefReference Summer
72.8 dB +1.50 dB
72.8 dB +1.50 dB
73.1 dB +1.80 dB
73.7 dB +2.40 dB
RefReference Winter
73.9 dB +2.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (2.6 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70,800 KM Best
67,700 KM -3,100 KM
64,100 KM -6,700 KM
59,900 KM -10,900 KM
59,600 KM -11,200 KM
52,000 KM -18,800 KM
50,500 KM -20,300 KM
50,100 KM -20,700 KM
48,100 KM -22,700 KM
39,000 KM -31,800 KM

The difference between best and worst was 44.9% (31,800 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
5.34 Price/1000 Best €14.54
5.96 Price/1000 +0.62 Price/1000 €12.16
6.35 Price/1000 +1.01 Price/1000 €7.98
6.36 Price/1000 +1.02 Price/1000 €10.25
6.4 Price/1000 +1.06 Price/1000 €10.30
6.69 Price/1000 +1.35 Price/1000 €12.68
6.93 Price/1000 +1.59 Price/1000 €11.50
7.21 Price/1000 +1.87 Price/1000 €12.96
7.38 Price/1000 +2.04 Price/1000 €13.30
10.26 Price/1000 +4.92 Price/1000 €12.05

The difference between best and worst was 92.1% (4.92 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Continental AllSeasonContact) works out €262 cheaper than the most expensive (Nexen N Blue 4 Season).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2019 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
8.45 kg/t Best £0
8.64 kg/t +0.19 kg/t £10
9.35 kg/t +0.90 kg/t £47
9.38 kg/t +0.93 kg/t £49
9.47 kg/t +1.02 kg/t £53
9.86 kg/t +1.41 kg/t £74
9.88 kg/t +1.43 kg/t £75
9.92 kg/t +1.47 kg/t £77
RefReference Winter
10.05 kg/t +1.60 kg/t £83
10.06 kg/t +1.61 kg/t £84
11.02 kg/t +2.57 kg/t £134
RefReference Summer
11.17 kg/t +2.72 kg/t £142

The difference between best and worst was 32.2% (2.72 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Nexen N Blue 4 Season uses about 92 L (£134) more fuel than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.