2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test

Below are all the data points for the 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental MaxContact MC7
Hankook iON Evo
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Toyo Proxes TR1
RoadX RXMOTION U11

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental MaxContact MC7 with a result of 34 M. The difference between best and worst was 14.8%.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 53.64 s. The difference between best and worst was 4.3%.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 7.5 Points. The difference between best and worst was 9.3%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental MaxContact MC7 with a result of 29.3 M. The difference between best and worst was 22.3%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental MaxContact MC7 with a result of 80.05 s. The difference between best and worst was 10.3%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental MaxContact MC7 with a result of 7.5 Points. The difference between best and worst was 36%.

Wet Circle (m/s)

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental MaxContact MC7 with a result of 0.95 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 18%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 5 with a result of 78.1 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 5.8%.

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 5 with a result of 3.31 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 22.1%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental MaxContact MC7 with a result of 7.1 Points. The difference between best and worst was 8.5%.

Noise (dB)

Internal noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON Evo with a result of 7.65 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 10.6%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
1 Continental MaxContact MC7 0%
2 Hankook iON Evo 0%
3 Michelin Pilot Sport 5 0%
4 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 0%
5 Toyo Proxes TR1 0%
6 RoadX RXMOTION U11 0%