Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
255/55 R18
Tyres tested
10
Disciplines
13

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
33.2 m Best 0 km/h
34.3 m +1.10 m 23 km/h
34.7 m +1.50 m 27 km/h
34.8 m +1.60 m 28 km/h
35.3 m +2.10 m 32 km/h
35.5 m +2.30 m 33 km/h
36.1 m +2.90 m 37 km/h
36.7 m +3.50 m 40 km/h
37.4 m +4.20 m 44 km/h
42.2 m +9.00 m 60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 27.1% (9 m ≈ 2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure would still be travelling at 60 km/h when the Falken Azenis FK520 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
108.1 km/h Best
107.8 km/h -0.30 km/h
106.7 km/h -1.40 km/h
106.5 km/h -1.60 km/h
106.4 km/h -1.70 km/h
106.4 km/h -1.70 km/h
106.3 km/h -1.80 km/h
105.5 km/h -2.60 km/h
104.4 km/h -3.70 km/h
102.3 km/h -5.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.4% (5.8 Km/H).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
46.8 m Best 0 km/h
47.6 m +0.80 m 17 km/h
48.4 m +1.60 m 24 km/h
48.8 m +2.00 m 26 km/h
49 m +2.20 m 28 km/h
50.8 m +4.00 m 36 km/h
52.4 m +5.60 m 42 km/h
55 m +8.20 m 50 km/h
59.5 m +12.70 m 60 km/h
65.4 m +18.60 m 69 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 39.7% (18.6 m ≈ 4.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure would still be travelling at 69 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
86.6 km/h Best
86.5 km/h -0.10 km/h
86 km/h -0.60 km/h
85.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
85.7 km/h -0.90 km/h
85 km/h -1.60 km/h
84 km/h -2.60 km/h
83.6 km/h -3.00 km/h
82.9 km/h -3.70 km/h
75.5 km/h -11.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 12.8% (11.1 Km/H).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
20.18 s Best
20.22 s +0.04 s
20.28 s +0.10 s
20.37 s +0.19 s
20.56 s +0.38 s
20.8 s +0.62 s
21.18 s +1.00 s
21.25 s +1.07 s
21.36 s +1.18 s
23.27 s +3.09 s

The difference between best and worst was 15.3% (3.09 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
87.8 km/h Best
87.4 km/h -0.40 km/h
86.7 km/h -1.10 km/h
86.4 km/h -1.40 km/h
86.2 km/h -1.60 km/h
85.9 km/h -1.90 km/h
85.5 km/h -2.30 km/h
83.1 km/h -4.70 km/h
82.8 km/h -5.00 km/h
72.2 km/h -15.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 17.8% (15.6 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration [Average Temperature 0]

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2.74 m/sec2 Best
2.59 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
2.57 m/sec2 -0.17 m/sec2
2.51 m/sec2 -0.23 m/sec2
2.48 m/sec2 -0.26 m/sec2
2.41 m/sec2 -0.33 m/sec2
2.41 m/sec2 -0.33 m/sec2
2.32 m/sec2 -0.42 m/sec2
2.26 m/sec2 -0.48 m/sec2
1.3 m/sec2 -1.44 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 52.6% (1.44 m/sec2).

Off road

4

Gravel Handling

Gravel Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Gravel Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
61.2 km/h Best
60.9 km/h -0.30 km/h
60.8 km/h -0.40 km/h
60.5 km/h -0.70 km/h
60.4 km/h -0.80 km/h
60.3 km/h -0.90 km/h
59.9 km/h -1.30 km/h
59.7 km/h -1.50 km/h
59.4 km/h -1.80 km/h
59.3 km/h -1.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 3.1% (1.9 Km/H).

Gravel Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Gravel Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
12150 N Best
11180 N -970.00 N
10920 N -1,230.00 N
10800 N -1,350.00 N
10630 N -1,520.00 N
10560 N -1,590.00 N
10530 N -1,620.00 N
10360 N -1,790.00 N
10360 N -1,790.00 N
10070 N -2,080.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 17.1% (2,080 N).

Sand Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Sand Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
11510 N Best
10280 N -1,230.00 N
10260 N -1,250.00 N
10190 N -1,320.00 N
10170 N -1,340.00 N
10050 N -1,460.00 N
9980 N -1,530.00 N
9870 N -1,640.00 N
9740 N -1,770.00 N
9440 N -2,070.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 18% (2,070 N).

Grass Traction

Grass Acceleration in Seconds

Lower is better ↓
Grass Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1.51 s Best
1.58 s +0.07 s
1.62 s +0.11 s
1.65 s +0.14 s
1.66 s +0.15 s
1.72 s +0.21 s
1.72 s +0.21 s
1.75 s +0.24 s
1.84 s +0.33 s
2 s +0.49 s

The difference between best and worst was 32.5% (0.49 s).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
62.1 dB Best
62.2 dB +0.10 dB
62.9 dB +0.80 dB
63.5 dB +1.40 dB
63.5 dB +1.40 dB
63.9 dB +1.80 dB
64 dB +1.90 dB
64.4 dB +2.30 dB
65 dB +2.90 dB
65.2 dB +3.10 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5% (3.1 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.23 kg/t Best £0
7.15 kg/t +0.92 kg/t £65
7.25 kg/t +1.02 kg/t £72
7.25 kg/t +1.02 kg/t £72
7.45 kg/t +1.22 kg/t £86
7.81 kg/t +1.58 kg/t £112
8.04 kg/t +1.81 kg/t £128
8.36 kg/t +2.13 kg/t £151
9.12 kg/t +2.89 kg/t £204
9.66 kg/t +3.43 kg/t £243

The difference between best and worst was 55.1% (3.43 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure uses about 167 L (£243) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.