Below are all the data points for the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs Bridgestone Potenza RE71 RS, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts:
For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.
Performance Overview
This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.
Hoosier TrackAttack Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Quick Navigation
Dry Performance Overview
Dry Handling (s)
Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Dry Handling Long Run (s)
Average long run time in seconds (Lower is better)
Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling long run test finished less than 3% apart.
Dry Handling - Autocross (s)
Short course lap time in seconds (Higher is better)
Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling - autocross test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)
Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)
Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 5%.
Overall Findings
Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:
| Position | Tyre | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Hoosier TrackAttack Pro | 99.6% | |
| 2 | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | 99.2% |
| 3 | Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS | 99% |
Test Winner
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
99%