Continental ContiSportContact 5 P Test Results
Tested 12 times by independent publications, the Continental ContiSportContact 5 P has taken 7 test wins with an average finish of 2nd.
- 12Independent tests
- 7Test wins
- 10Podium finishes
- 2ndAverage finish
- 82%Field beaten on average
- 7Publications
12 tests, 2010 to 2017
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 82%
2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test P1 of 9
Record by discipline
Where the Continental ContiSportContact 5 P finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 1 | P1 of 9 | 100% | 1 |
| Dry Handling | 1 | P2 of 9 | 88% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 1 | P1 of 9 | 100% | 1 |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Continental ContiSportContact 5 P. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 4 | 2 | - | 67% | |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% | |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | - | 60% | |
| 5 | 2 | 3 | - | 40% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tyre it replaced and the tyre that replaced it.
| Tyre | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 P This tyre | 12 | 7 | 2nd | 82% |
| Continental Sport Contact 6 Successor | 16 | 7 | 2nd | 75% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 12 tests. Updated September 21, 2025.
The ContiSportContact 5 P shows consistently elite UHP performance with an average overall position of 2.1 across 12 tests, including multiple overall wins (2010-2017) and frequent podiums. It excels in both dry and wet braking, and regularly delivers balanced handling, evidenced by repeated top-two finishes and test-winning all-round capability. Awards and editor comments repeatedly cite its comprehensive performance envelope.
A few outliers appear in specific handling-focused European tests where precision and ultimate lap pace slightly trailed the very best, and one older Sport Auto result (7/9 in 2012) marks a notable dip. Still, the prevailing pattern is of a benchmark tyre in its era, especially in braking and all-conditions competence.
Performance Strengths
-
Dry Braking Performance
Strong
Details
- 1st place dry braking in 2017 Motor Mag (35.73 m)
- 1st place dry braking in 2010 Auto Bild (35 m)
-
Wet Braking Performance
Strong
Details
- 1st place wet braking in 2017 Motor Mag (13.96 m)
- Multiple test wins/podiums with comments on excellent all-round wet capability (2010 Auto Bild, 2010 Sport Auto)
-
Overall All-Round Performance
Strong
Details
- Overall winner in 2017 Motor Mag (1/9)
- Overall winner in 2015 Auto Review (1/7)
- Overall winner in 2012 Auto Bild 20" (1/8)
- Overall winner in 2011 AutoReview (1/9)
- Overall winner in 2010 Auto Bild (1/6)
-
Dry Handling and Lap Time Consistency
Moderate
Details
- 2nd place dry handling in 2017 Motor Mag (78.4 s)
- 2015 Auto Bild: grouped closely for 3rd-5th lap times, competitive with premium rivals
-
High-Performance Fitments/Big Sizes Competence
Strong
Details
- 2012 Auto Bild 20" test winner (1/8), only premium brand with latest pattern
- Strong results across 19-20" sizes with multiple wins/podiums (2010-2017)
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Strong
in 4 of 8 tests
Details
High resistance to aquaplaning
- 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tyre Test (2015)Strong aquaplaning resistance
- 2012 Auto Bild 20 inch Tyre Test (2012)and has an extremely strong aquaplaning result
- 2012 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test (2012)excellent resistance to aquaplaning
- 2011 Autoreview Max Performance Summer Tyre Test (2011)
-
Wet braking
Strong
in 4 of 8 tests
Details
short braking distances on wet roads
- 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tyre Test (2015)Braking in the wet
- 2014 Auto Review Max Performance Tyre Test (2014)This leaves the Sport Contact 5P excellent in both the wet and the dry braking tests
- 2012 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test (2012)short braking
- 2012 Auto Bild 20 inch Tyre Test (2012)
-
Dry handling
Strong
in 3 of 8 tests
Details
- 2015 Auto Bild Performance Tyre Test (2015)
very good handling on dry surfaces
- 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tyre Test (2015)A strong all round performance, setting the standard in many tests
- 2010 EVO FWD Tyre Test (2010)
-
Steering feel
Strong
in 3 of 8 tests
Details
precise steering response on dry roads
- 2015 Auto Bild Performance Tyre Test (2015)high steering precision in the wet
- 2012 Auto Bild 20 inch Tyre Test (2012)Excellent subjective steering feel
- 2010 EVO FWD Tyre Test (2010)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Steering Precision/Subjective Handling Finesse
Moderate
Details
- 2010 Sport Auto: noted slight lack of steering precision despite 2nd overall
- 2012 Sport Auto: 7/9 overall indicating handling-focused shortfall vs rivals
-
Ultimate Dry Lap Pace Versus Top Rivals
Minor
Details
- 2015 Auto Bild: placed 5/7 overall with lap times clustered 3rd-5th indicating not the outright fastest
- 2011 subjective shootout: 2/3 behind best in class
-
Road noise
Moderate
in 2 of 8 tests
Details
A relatively high noise level
- 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tyre Test (2015)Slightly noisy ride
- 2010 EVO FWD Tyre Test (2010)
-
Tread life
Minor
in 1 of 8 tests
Details
Poor tread wear
- 2011 Autoreview Max Performance Summer Tyre Test (2011)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Continental ContiSportContact 5 P (8 tests) and 98 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Dry grip strength in 2 of 8 tests 44 praise, 7 criticise of 98 reviews · Read those reviews
- Wet grip strength in 2 of 8 tests 25 praise, 12 criticise of 98 reviews · Read those reviews
- Road noise weakness in 2 of 8 tests 6 praise, 16 criticise of 98 reviews · Read those reviews
- Dry braking strength in 3 of 8 tests 8 praise, 1 criticise of 98 reviews · Read those reviews
- Wet braking strength in 4 of 8 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 98 reviews · Read those reviews
Where they disagree
- Aquaplaning resistance strength in 4 of 8 tests 1 praise, 3 criticise of 98 reviews · Read those reviews
- Wet handling strength in 3 of 8 tests 2 praise, 5 criticise of 98 reviews · Read those reviews
Every test, newest first 12
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2014 Auto Review Max Performance Tyre Test
In 2011 the 5P won our tyre test on a Focus RS and Scirocco R, and the Continental is equally good on a Mustang! On the wet track the car has good grip, and starts to slide smoothly and predictably. In the dry, the tyre doesn't quite have the control accuracy as the Michelin or Pirelli, but it has a good time none the less. No problems with wear, and good comfort make for a lovely tyre for everyday use on high speed cars.
2012 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test
The Continental Sport Contact 5P follows the usual Continental methodology - braking comes first. This leaves the Sport Contact 5P excellent in both the wet and the dry braking tests and has an extremely strong aquaplaning result. On the track there is a slight delay to the Continentals steering, and moderate understeer as you push on.
2011 Autoreview Max Performance Summer Tyre Test
The SportContact 5P is a very balanced tyre, scoring strongly in both the wet and dry. The main achievement of the 5P is the excellent resistance to aquaplaning with excennelt braking characteristics on dry roads. At the limit of grip in the wet, the tyre starts sliding gently and only needs small steering angles to get back in line. The speed on the track isn't the highest, but it's not far off the leader, just 0.6 seconds behind in the dry.
2011 Subjective shootout - 255/40 R19 Max Performance Summer Tyres
While the Continental matched the Goodyear for lateral grip, it couldn't match the Asymmetric 2 under braking or more importantly, subjective feel. In the dry the Conti offered a reasonable level of feedback but poor turn in. Initial bite was good, but then the car seemed to pause for a split second as the tyre rolled under the car and obtained required slip angle - this also caused mid corner corrections to be somewhat vague. In the wet, with reduced cornering forces the Conti was much closer to the Goodyear and was extremely close. Past the limit, the 5P felt easy to control, and was an enjoyable tyre to slide.
Back to the Continental ContiSportContact 5 P overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Continental tyres

