- Mazda MX5
- 195/50 R15 V
- 8,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Average
Hankook Ventus V12 evo k110 Owner Reviews
Review this tyreWhat owners say summarised from 97 reviews
Dry grip leads owner praise for the Hankook Ventus V12 evo k110, with wet grip, comfort and value also generally viewed favourably. Noise attracts more positive than negative comments, although a minority finds it intrusive. The main qualifications are mixed tread life and steering feel, with roughly one in eight reviews criticising feedback and around one in ten finding the sidewalls too soft. Actual longer-use accounts range from early replacement to substantial mileage, so there is no single expected lifespan. Two repeat histories duplicate earlier scores and one remains positive after a modest drop, rather than establishing a general decline with age.
What owners mention most counted across 93 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 114 ratings
- Owner score 77%
- Dry Grip 84%
- Comfort 79%
- Handling 78%
- Road Feedback 76%
- Wet Grip 75%
- Wear 74%
Hankook Ventus V12 evo k110 Reviews - Page 3
- Nissan 350z
- 245/40 R18 W
- Mostly Country Roads
- Average
- SEAT Ibiza FR TDi
- 215/40 R17 W
- 4,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Previously I had 4 Potenza RE050A (came with the car when was new), and despite they were not the best in terms of confort, they were pretty great in terms of handling and putting the power down on the tarmac.
In the wet they were like a 5/10, but in the dry they were wonderful (8/10 no problem).
I also had Continental PremiumContact2, I know they were not a sports tyre, but I also liked them, even more than the Bridgestone. They were better in confort, equal or better in the wet and a little worse in the dry.
In terms of wear the Contis were worse than the Bridgestones.
But know, talking about the so called Ventus V12 Evo.
I searched and searched and, for the price, the V12 Evo seemed good enough for me, and in terms of confort they were/are, in fact, much better than the Potenzas RE050A.
The Potenzas were always bad and made the car too stiff, and for that reason I was, in fact, looking for more confortable tires. And that was accomplished indeed.
But the cons...
I drove my Ibiza FR with Hankooks for 3000 miles only in the dry (since July to a week ago I only got dry roads) and I didnt enjoy these tires at all. Very bad putting the power down, the side walls are very soft and, especially in the rear, that makes this Ibiza 6J FR very "nervous" when you push it a little bit more.
And these are suposed to be "high performance tires" ? Give me a break!
Yesterday I catched wet roads, and well it was a bit scary. I even got a little "surprise" aquaplaning and I almost had an acident (little, but and acident)...
The ESP was turning on constantly, an that never happened with the Contis PC2 and the Potenzas RE050A...
And If I tell you what I was thinking about theses Hankook and the begining... The gum in these tires were imense... Around 2000 miles to get the gum out (or more).
When I changed to the Hankooks I felted like the car was ruined.
I could go on and on, but I think that is it.
I don't recommend these tires, especially in a Ibiza FR (6J model).
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Hankook Ventus V12 evo k110? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Honda CIVIC 1.6 VTEC
- 195/55 R15
- 8,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
End result, its a cheap tyre, not a performance tyre.
- Honda CIVIC 1.6 VTEC
- 195/55 R15
- 8,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
End result, its a cheap tyre, not a performance tyre.
- Ford Fiesta
- 195/50 R15 V
- 100 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
- Volvo v70 D5
- 225/45 R17
- 12,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
The volvo v70 is quite heavy on the front end and owing to its 5 potter transverse diesel lump can be quite unforgiving to park and steer correctly on some surfaces but the v12s make light work of it and give reasonable feedback.
I bought them to try on the front end last year and at this years mot still have 5 mm so have moved them to the back axle set and fitted 2 new of the same on the front axle set.They are quiet and handle the bumps quite well.If they have any failing I would say the tyre walls looklike you have flat tyres but I am running on 36psi so Iit is just soft wall is all nothing to worry about as they are reinforced side walls anyway.Overall a very trustworthy tyre good stopping in wet and dry which on the v70 gives great driving confidence.l will continue to buy these tyres .Hankook certainly imo can no longer be accused of only selling budget tyres they have come of age and rightly deserve their position.
- Mazda 3 Series
- 205/55 R16 W
- 25,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Audi A4 2.0 TDI 140 SLine
- 225/50 R17 W
- 300 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Easy Going
- Skoda Octavia
- 225/45 R17
- 12,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Ford Fiesta mk7
- 205/40 R17 W
- 500 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Kia Motors Forte
- 225/45 R17
- 16,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tyre
All tyre testsThe latest Tyre Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tyres for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tyres Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27 →
Summer Tyres
All Season Tyres
Winter Tyres
SUV and All Terrain Tyres
Track Tyres
Which tyres do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tyres.

