2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test
Warning, lots of data ahead! For the 2019 winter, Auto Motor und Sport have tested eleven of the best winter tyres in the 215/55 R17 crossover SUV size.
The biggest plus of this test is the sheer amount of data they've produced, as they've rated the tyres both objectively and subjectively in a lot of categories.
It's also good news for Goodyear, as the new Goodyear UltraGrip Performance + wins on its first outing, proving to have an excellent balance of wet and snow performance, along with short dry braking distances.
Stepping up on the promise of 2018, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 once again proves itself as a strong contender, and maybe the tyre of choice for the snowier climates.
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro rounds out the top three places. This tyre might be the best choice for the drier, warmer climates, as it excelled in the dry and wet handling tests, but was a little weaker than the best on test during snow testing.
The other result worth mentioning was the new Nokian SnowProof. It's not very often we see Nokian performing badly in a winter test, let alone finishing last. In this test, the Nokian performed extremely well in the dry, with the best dry braking result and had a good result in the snow, but really struggled in the wet. As this is the first test of the SnowProof we've seen, we'll await more test data to see whether the new Nokian really is this bad in the wet, or it was something related to this test.
The overall results were incredibly close, with all the tyres down to eighth place being recommended, but if you want the best for your SUV in 215/55 R17, pick from the top five.
Dry
Interestingly, the top two spots during dry braking were taken by the bottom two tyres overall, with the Nokian and Giti proving to be the best at stopping the VW T-Roc.
Dry handling was extremely close between the eleven tyres, with a difference of just 2 km/h between the best and worst tyres.
The sporty Vredestein was the only tyre to receive ten points during subjective dry handling scoring.
Wet
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had a significant advantage during wet braking.
The top three tyres overall dominated wet handling, both in average speed and subjectively.
The Falken had an advantage during the aquaplaning testing, with the rest of the tyres closely matched.
Snow
Bridgestone once again stopped the VW T-Roc in the shortest distance, this time during snow braking.
As in the wet testing, the new Goodyear proved to be excellent during snow handling.
Environment
All the tyres were relatively close in both external noise and subjective internal noise, but the Falken proved to have the best balance of the two.
The Continental WinterContact TS850P had the lowest rolling resistance, but was one of the most expensive to buy.
Results
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 3rd | 44.5 M | 44.1 M | +0.4 M | 99.1% | Dry Handling | 11th | 114.1 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -2 Km/H | 98.28% | Subj. Dry Handling | 6th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | Wet Braking | 3rd | 32.5 M | 31.2 M | +1.3 M | 96% | Wet Handling | 1st | 73.3 Km/H | | | 100% | Subj. Wet Handling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | Straight Aqua | 2nd | 76.5 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -6.6 Km/H | 92.06% | Snow Braking | 2nd | 26 M | 25.6 M | +0.4 M | 98.46% | Snow Handling | 1st | 49.4 Km/H | | | 100% | Subj. Snow Handling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | Subj. Comfort | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Noise | 6th | 70.2 dB | 69.3 dB | +0.9 dB | 98.72% | Price | 9th | 145 | 73 | +72 | 50.34% | Rolling Resistance | 4th | 8 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +0.6 kg / t | 92.5% |
Great in the wet and on snow, show braking in the dry, worked well with the vehicles ESP systems Average dry grip when cornering Test winner Read Reviews |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 4th | 44.6 M | 44.1 M | +0.5 M | 98.88% | Dry Handling | 7th | 114.9 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -1.2 Km/H | 98.97% | Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Wet Braking | 1st | 31.2 M | | | 100% | Wet Handling | 3rd | 72.9 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -0.4 Km/H | 99.45% | Subj. Wet Handling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | Straight Aqua | 6th | 75.5 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -7.6 Km/H | 90.85% | Snow Braking | 1st | 25.6 M | | | 100% | Snow Handling | 7th | 48 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -1.4 Km/H | 97.17% | Subj. Snow Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Subj. Comfort | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Noise | 6th | 70.2 dB | 69.3 dB | +0.9 dB | 98.72% | Price | 7th | 128 | 73 | +55 | 57.03% | Rolling Resistance | 2nd | 7.6 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +0.2 kg / t | 97.37% |
Very good handling in the snow and the wet, stable behavior during emergency maneuvers Relatively long braking and poor lateral stability in the dry Excellent Read Reviews |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 4th | 44.6 M | 44.1 M | +0.5 M | 98.88% | Dry Handling | 4th | 115.4 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -0.7 Km/H | 99.4% | Subj. Dry Handling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | Wet Braking | 4th | 32.6 M | 31.2 M | +1.4 M | 95.71% | Wet Handling | 2nd | 73.2 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -0.1 Km/H | 99.86% | Subj. Wet Handling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | Straight Aqua | 5th | 75.8 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -7.3 Km/H | 91.22% | Snow Braking | 8th | 27.3 M | 25.6 M | +1.7 M | 93.77% | Snow Handling | 4th | 48.4 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -1 Km/H | 97.98% | Subj. Snow Handling | 8th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | Subj. Comfort | 8th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | Noise | 4th | 70 dB | 69.3 dB | +0.7 dB | 99% | Price | 5th | 118 | 73 | +45 | 61.86% | Rolling Resistance | 8th | 8.7 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +1.3 kg / t | 85.06% |
Precise steering response and high traction in the dry and wet Relatively long snow braking, high rolling resistance Excellent Read Reviews |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 8th | 45.7 M | 44.1 M | +1.6 M | 96.5% | Dry Handling | 3rd | 115.6 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -0.5 Km/H | 99.57% | Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Wet Braking | 2nd | 32.3 M | 31.2 M | +1.1 M | 96.59% | Wet Handling | 5th | 72.5 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -0.8 Km/H | 98.91% | Subj. Wet Handling | 5th | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Straight Aqua | 4th | 76 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -7.1 Km/H | 91.46% | Snow Braking | 6th | 27.2 M | 25.6 M | +1.6 M | 94.12% | Snow Handling | 6th | 48.3 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -1.1 Km/H | 97.77% | Subj. Snow Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Subj. Comfort | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Noise | 9th | 70.7 dB | 69.3 dB | +1.4 dB | 98.02% | Price | 10th | 147 | 73 | +74 | 49.66% | Rolling Resistance | 1st | 7.4 kg / t | | | 100% |
Although tires were launched five years ago, they still perform well due to their balanced performance, stable behavior and good lateral stability in the snow, good wet handling Relatively long braking distance on snow and dry surfaces Excellent Read Reviews |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 4th | 44.6 M | 44.1 M | +0.5 M | 98.88% | Dry Handling | 7th | 114.9 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -1.2 Km/H | 98.97% | Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Wet Braking | 5th | 33.5 M | 31.2 M | +2.3 M | 93.13% | Wet Handling | 4th | 72.6 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -0.7 Km/H | 99.05% | Subj. Wet Handling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | Straight Aqua | 7th | 75.4 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -7.7 Km/H | 90.73% | Snow Braking | 6th | 27.2 M | 25.6 M | +1.6 M | 94.12% | Snow Handling | 10th | 47.7 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -1.7 Km/H | 96.56% | Subj. Snow Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Subj. Comfort | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Noise | 8th | 70.5 dB | 69.3 dB | +1.2 dB | 98.3% | Price | 11th | 160 | 73 | +87 | 45.63% | Rolling Resistance | 4th | 8 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +0.6 kg / t | 92.5% |
Good handling in the snow and on dry roads, good lateral grip in the wet Relatively long braking distances in the snow and wet Good Read Reviews |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 11th | 46.8 M | 44.1 M | +2.7 M | 94.23% | Dry Handling | 2nd | 115.9 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -0.2 Km/H | 99.83% | Subj. Dry Handling | 6th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | Wet Braking | 5th | 33.5 M | 31.2 M | +2.3 M | 93.13% | Wet Handling | 7th | 70.7 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -2.6 Km/H | 96.45% | Subj. Wet Handling | 8th | 6 Points | 10 Points | -4 Points | 60% | Straight Aqua | 9th | 72.3 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -10.8 Km/H | 87% | Snow Braking | 4th | 26.5 M | 25.6 M | +0.9 M | 96.6% | Snow Handling | 2nd | 49.2 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -0.2 Km/H | 99.6% | Subj. Snow Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Subj. Comfort | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Noise | 1st | 69.3 dB | | | 100% | Price | 4th | 115 | 73 | +42 | 63.48% | Rolling Resistance | 10th | 9 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +1.6 kg / t | 82.22% |
Good traction and handling in the snow, good dry handling, very quiet Long dry braking, unbalanced in the wet, high rolling resistance Good Read Reviews |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 10th | 45.9 M | 44.1 M | +1.8 M | 96.08% | Dry Handling | 9th | 114.4 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -1.7 Km/H | 98.54% | Subj. Dry Handling | 10th | 7 Points | 10 Points | -3 Points | 70% | Wet Braking | 8th | 34 M | 31.2 M | +2.8 M | 91.76% | Wet Handling | 10th | 69.8 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -3.5 Km/H | 95.23% | Subj. Wet Handling | 8th | 6 Points | 10 Points | -4 Points | 60% | Straight Aqua | 1st | 83.1 Km/H | | | 100% | Snow Braking | 3rd | 26.1 M | 25.6 M | +0.5 M | 98.08% | Snow Handling | 3rd | 48.7 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -0.7 Km/H | 98.58% | Subj. Snow Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Subj. Comfort | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | Noise | 3rd | 69.8 dB | 69.3 dB | +0.5 dB | 99.28% | Price | 2nd | 106 | 73 | +33 | 68.87% | Rolling Resistance | 11th | 9.3 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +1.9 kg / t | 79.57% |
Good snow performance, very good aquaplaning resistance Relatively weak wet grip, average dry performance Good Read Reviews |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 8th | 45.7 M | 44.1 M | +1.6 M | 96.5% | Dry Handling | 1st | 116.1 Km/H | | | 100% | Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Wet Braking | 10th | 34.8 M | 31.2 M | +3.6 M | 89.66% | Wet Handling | 8th | 70.5 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -2.8 Km/H | 96.18% | Subj. Wet Handling | 8th | 6 Points | 10 Points | -4 Points | 60% | Straight Aqua | 8th | 74.1 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -9 Km/H | 89.17% | Snow Braking | 11th | 28.1 M | 25.6 M | +2.5 M | 91.1% | Snow Handling | 8th | 47.9 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -1.5 Km/H | 96.96% | Subj. Snow Handling | 10th | 7 Points | 10 Points | -3 Points | 70% | Subj. Comfort | 8th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | Noise | 10th | 71 dB | 69.3 dB | +1.7 dB | 97.61% | Price | 3rd | 111 | 73 | +38 | 65.77% | Rolling Resistance | 3rd | 7.9 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +0.5 kg / t | 93.67% |
Strong in the dry Long braking distances in the dry, wet and snow. Poor snow handling, poor wet handling Good Read Reviews |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 7th | 44.8 M | 44.1 M | +0.7 M | 98.44% | Dry Handling | 10th | 114.2 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -1.9 Km/H | 98.36% | Subj. Dry Handling | 6th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | Wet Braking | 9th | 34.4 M | 31.2 M | +3.2 M | 90.7% | Wet Handling | 9th | 70.3 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -3 Km/H | 95.91% | Subj. Wet Handling | 6th | 7 Points | 10 Points | -3 Points | 70% | Straight Aqua | 10th | 71.7 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -11.4 Km/H | 86.28% | Snow Braking | 10th | 27.9 M | 25.6 M | +2.3 M | 91.76% | Snow Handling | 8th | 47.9 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -1.5 Km/H | 96.96% | Subj. Snow Handling | 8th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | Subj. Comfort | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Noise | 11th | 71.1 dB | 69.3 dB | +1.8 dB | 97.47% | Price | 8th | 134 | 73 | +61 | 54.48% | Rolling Resistance | 7th | 8.6 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +1.2 kg / t | 86.05% |
Balanced dry performance Long braking distances in the snow and wet, weak aquaplaning resistance Average Read Reviews Buy from £172.01 |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 2nd | 44.3 M | 44.1 M | +0.2 M | 99.55% | Dry Handling | 5th | 115.2 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -0.9 Km/H | 99.22% | Subj. Dry Handling | 10th | 7 Points | 10 Points | -3 Points | 70% | Wet Braking | 5th | 33.5 M | 31.2 M | +2.3 M | 93.13% | Wet Handling | 6th | 70.8 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -2.5 Km/H | 96.59% | Subj. Wet Handling | 6th | 7 Points | 10 Points | -3 Points | 70% | Straight Aqua | 2nd | 76.5 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -6.6 Km/H | 92.06% | Snow Braking | 9th | 27.7 M | 25.6 M | +2.1 M | 92.42% | Snow Handling | 11th | 46 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -3.4 Km/H | 93.12% | Subj. Snow Handling | 10th | 7 Points | 10 Points | -3 Points | 70% | Subj. Comfort | 11th | 7 Points | 10 Points | -3 Points | 70% | Noise | 5th | 70.1 dB | 69.3 dB | +0.8 dB | 98.86% | Price | 1st | 73 | | | 100% | Rolling Resistance | 9th | 8.8 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +1.4 kg / t | 84.09% |
Very low price, short braking distances in the dry Long braking distances and poor grip in the snow, poor wet handling, understeer in the dry Average Read Reviews |
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
---|
Dry Braking | 1st | 44.1 M | | | 100% | Dry Handling | 5th | 115.2 Km/H | 116.1 Km/H | -0.9 Km/H | 99.22% | Subj. Dry Handling | 6th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | Wet Braking | 11th | 36.1 M | 31.2 M | +4.9 M | 86.43% | Wet Handling | 11th | 68.9 Km/H | 73.3 Km/H | -4.4 Km/H | 94% | Subj. Wet Handling | 8th | 6 Points | 10 Points | -4 Points | 60% | Straight Aqua | 11th | 70.3 Km/H | 83.1 Km/H | -12.8 Km/H | 84.6% | Snow Braking | 5th | 26.6 M | 25.6 M | +1 M | 96.24% | Snow Handling | 4th | 48.4 Km/H | 49.4 Km/H | -1 Km/H | 97.98% | Subj. Snow Handling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | Subj. Comfort | 8th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | Noise | 2nd | 69.7 dB | 69.3 dB | +0.4 dB | 99.43% | Price | 6th | 125 | 73 | +52 | 58.4% | Rolling Resistance | 6th | 8.4 kg / t | 7.4 kg / t | +1 kg / t | 88.1% |
Good handling in the snow, short braking distances in the snow and dry, acceptable safety on dry roads Long braking distances and poor lateral stability in the wet Average Read Reviews |