Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
195/65 R15
Tyres tested
10
Disciplines
11

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
39 m -0.40 m
39.4 m Best
40.8 m +1.40 m
43.1 m +3.70 m
43.4 m +4.00 m
43.6 m +4.20 m
43.6 m +4.20 m
43.9 m +4.50 m
44.2 m +4.80 m
44.6 m +5.20 m
45.8 m +6.40 m
RefReference Winter
47 m +7.60 m

The difference between best and worst was 20.5% (8 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
110.6 km/h +2.00 km/h
108.6 km/h Best
107.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
107.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
107.7 km/h -0.90 km/h
107.3 km/h -1.30 km/h
107.1 km/h -1.50 km/h
107.1 km/h -1.50 km/h
107 km/h -1.60 km/h
107 km/h -1.60 km/h
RefReference Winter
106.7 km/h -1.90 km/h
106.6 km/h -2.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (4 Km/H).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
41.4 m -3.80 m
45.2 m Best
46.2 m +1.00 m
47.8 m +2.60 m
48.1 m +2.90 m
48.6 m +3.40 m
48.6 m +3.40 m
49.5 m +4.30 m
49.9 m +4.70 m
50.7 m +5.50 m
50.7 m +5.50 m
RefReference Winter
53.4 m +8.20 m

The difference between best and worst was 29% (12 m ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
73.1 km/h +0.20 km/h
72.9 km/h Best
72.5 km/h -0.40 km/h
72.4 km/h -0.50 km/h
71.9 km/h -1.00 km/h
71.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
71.5 km/h -1.40 km/h
71.3 km/h -1.60 km/h
70.6 km/h -2.30 km/h
RefReference Winter
70.2 km/h -2.70 km/h
69.9 km/h -3.00 km/h
69.7 km/h -3.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (3.4 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
85.2 km/h Best
83.9 km/h -1.30 km/h
81.5 km/h -3.70 km/h
81.2 km/h -4.00 km/h
80.8 km/h -4.40 km/h
80.7 km/h -4.50 km/h
78.5 km/h -6.70 km/h
RefReference Winter
78.1 km/h -7.10 km/h
RefReference Summer
75.7 km/h -9.50 km/h
75.2 km/h -10.00 km/h
74.3 km/h -10.90 km/h
72.7 km/h -12.50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.7% (12.5 Km/H).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
25.2 m -0.50 m
25.7 m Best
26.2 m +0.50 m
26.3 m +0.60 m
26.6 m +0.90 m
26.9 m +1.20 m
27.2 m +1.50 m
27.4 m +1.70 m
27.8 m +2.10 m
28.3 m +2.60 m
31.1 m +5.40 m
RefReference Summer
42.9 m +17.20 m

The difference between best and worst was 70.2% (17.7 m ≈ 3.9 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
58.2 km/h Best
RefReference Winter
58 km/h -0.20 km/h
57.9 km/h -0.30 km/h
57.9 km/h -0.30 km/h
57.6 km/h -0.60 km/h
57.5 km/h -0.70 km/h
57.5 km/h -0.70 km/h
57.3 km/h -0.90 km/h
56.6 km/h -1.60 km/h
56.5 km/h -1.70 km/h
55.1 km/h -3.10 km/h
RefReference Summer
31.8 km/h -26.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 45.4% (26.4 Km/H).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.4 dB Best
70.6 dB +0.20 dB
71.1 dB +0.70 dB
71.9 dB +1.50 dB
72 dB +1.60 dB
RefReference Winter
72.4 dB +2.00 dB
RefReference Summer
72.6 dB +2.20 dB
72.7 dB +2.30 dB
73 dB +2.60 dB
73.4 dB +3.00 dB
74 dB +3.60 dB
74.6 dB +4.20 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6% (4.2 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
58,800 KM Best
51,700 KM -7,100 KM
50,200 KM -8,600 KM
45,700 KM -13,100 KM
43,200 KM -15,600 KM
42,900 KM -15,900 KM
40,000 KM -18,800 KM
35,500 KM -23,300 KM
34,700 KM -24,100 KM
32,200 KM -26,600 KM

The difference between best and worst was 45.2% (26,600 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
4.84 Price/1000 Best €12.03
5.01 Price/1000 +0.17 Price/1000 €15.84
5.27 Price/1000 +0.43 Price/1000 €11.81
5.58 Price/1000 +0.74 Price/1000 €11.03
5.79 Price/1000 +0.95 Price/1000 €12.79
6.24 Price/1000 +1.40 Price/1000 €10.40
6.63 Price/1000 +1.79 Price/1000 €12.19
7.06 Price/1000 +2.22 Price/1000 €14.39
7.46 Price/1000 +2.62 Price/1000 €9.44
8.07 Price/1000 +3.23 Price/1000 €17.52

The difference between best and worst was 66.7% (3.23 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Nokian WeatherProof) works out €323 cheaper than the most expensive (Pirelli Cinturato All Season Plus).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2018 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.41 kg/t Best £0
8.15 kg/t +0.74 kg/t £44
8.48 kg/t +1.07 kg/t £64
8.55 kg/t +1.14 kg/t £68
8.9 kg/t +1.49 kg/t £89
8.91 kg/t +1.50 kg/t £89
8.92 kg/t +1.51 kg/t £90
9.05 kg/t +1.64 kg/t £98
9.45 kg/t +2.04 kg/t £121
RefReference Summer
9.6 kg/t +2.19 kg/t £130
RefReference Winter
9.96 kg/t +2.55 kg/t £152
9.99 kg/t +2.58 kg/t £153

The difference between best and worst was 34.8% (2.58 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Nexen N Blue 4 Season uses about 106 L (£153) more fuel than the Nokian WeatherProof.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.