Charts 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test

Below are all the data points for the 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.

How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Continental Sport Contact 5

Falken FK510 SUV

Nokian WetProof

Pirelli CINTURATO P7

Vredestein Ultrac Satin

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Yokohama BluEarth RV02

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 5 with a result of 35.03 M. The difference between best and worst was 8.1%.

Continental Sport Contact 5

35.03 M
Nokian WetProof

35.17 M
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

35.56 M
Falken FK510 SUV

35.66 M
Pirelli CINTURATO P7

37.67 M
Yokohama BluEarth RV02

37.78 M
Vredestein Ultrac Satin

37.94 M
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

38.12 M

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 5 with a result of 3 Points. The difference between best and worst was 66.7%.

Continental Sport Contact 5

3 Points
Falken FK510 SUV

3 Points
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

3 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Satin

2 Points
Nokian WetProof

2 Points
Pirelli CINTURATO P7

2 Points
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

1 Points
Yokohama BluEarth RV02

1 Points

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 with a result of 38.72 M. The difference between best and worst was 6.8%.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

38.72 M
Falken FK510 SUV

38.84 M
Continental Sport Contact 5

38.98 M
Nokian WetProof

39.27 M
Vredestein Ultrac Satin

39.64 M
Pirelli CINTURATO P7

39.99 M
Yokohama BluEarth RV02

40.6 M
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

41.55 M

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 5 with a result of 3 Points. The difference between best and worst was 66.7%.

Continental Sport Contact 5

3 Points
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

3 Points
Pirelli CINTURATO P7

2 Points
Nokian WetProof

2 Points
Falken FK510 SUV

2 Points
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

1 Points
Yokohama BluEarth RV02

1 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Satin

1 Points

Wet Circle (m/s)

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken FK510 SUV with a result of 8.09 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 9.9%.

Falken FK510 SUV

8.09 m/s
Vredestein Ultrac Satin

7.94 m/s
Continental Sport Contact 5

7.88 m/s
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

7.77 m/s
Nokian WetProof

7.73 m/s
Yokohama BluEarth RV02

7.55 m/s
Pirelli CINTURATO P7

7.47 m/s
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

7.29 m/s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli CINTURATO P7 with a result of 78.4 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 5.7%.

Pirelli CINTURATO P7

78.4 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

77.7 Km/H
Continental Sport Contact 5

77.2 Km/H
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

77.1 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Satin

77.1 Km/H
Falken FK510 SUV

77 Km/H
Nokian WetProof

76.1 Km/H
Yokohama BluEarth RV02

73.9 Km/H

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 with a result of 3 Points. The difference between best and worst was 33.3%.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

3 Points
Pirelli CINTURATO P7

3 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Satin

3 Points
Continental Sport Contact 5

2 Points
Falken FK510 SUV

2 Points
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

2 Points
Yokohama BluEarth RV02

2 Points
Nokian WetProof

2 Points

Subj. Noise ( Points)

Subjective in car noise levels (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 with a result of 3 Points. The difference between best and worst was 33.3%.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

3 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Satin

3 Points
Falken FK510 SUV

3 Points
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

2 Points
Yokohama BluEarth RV02

2 Points
Pirelli CINTURATO P7

2 Points
Nokian WetProof

2 Points
Continental Sport Contact 5

2 Points

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian WetProof with a result of 0.97 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 19.2%.

Nokian WetProof

0.97 kg / t
Pirelli CINTURATO P7

1 kg / t
Continental Sport Contact 5

1.01 kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Satin

1.03 kg / t
Yokohama BluEarth RV02

1.05 kg / t
Falken FK510 SUV

1.15 kg / t
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

1.16 kg / t
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

1.2 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position	Tyre	Score
	Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5	0%
2	Continental Sport Contact 5	0%
3	Falken FK510 SUV	0%
4	Nokian WetProof	0%
5	Pirelli CINTURATO P7	0%
6	Vredestein Ultrac Satin	0%
7	Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV	0%
8	Yokohama BluEarth RV02	0%

Menu

2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test