2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test

Below are all the data points for the 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Pirelli Scorpion Verde
Nankang AS1
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV with a result of 33.9 M. The difference between best and worst was 15.5%.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV with a result of 21.5 M. The difference between best and worst was 18.3%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV with a result of 71.59 s. The difference between best and worst was 8.2%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV with a result of 90.4 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 15.9%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 with a result of 4 Points. The difference between best and worst was 50%.

Subj. Noise ( Points)

Subjective in car noise levels (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 with a result of 4 Points. The difference between best and worst was 50%.

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Turanza T005 with a result of 4.97 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 6%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
1 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 0%
2 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 0%
3 Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV 0%
4 Bridgestone Turanza T005 0%
5 Vredestein Ultrac Satin 0%
6 Pirelli Scorpion Verde 0%
7 Nankang AS1 0%
8 Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 0%
comments powered by Disqus