2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test

Below are all the data points for the 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
Continental Premium Contact 6
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Nokian PowerProof
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Falken Azenis FK510
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
GT-Radial SportActive 2

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 34.6 M. The difference between best and worst was 7.2%.

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 with a result of 29.5 M. The difference between best and worst was 14.2%.

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 88.4 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.4%.

Wet Circle (m/s)

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 6.67 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 4%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 with a result of 73.3 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 14.1%.

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was GT-Radial SportActive 2 with a result of 2.9 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 17.2%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 with a result of 67.3 dB. The difference between best and worst was 5.3%.

Value Performance Overview

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was GT-Radial SportActive 2. The difference between best and worst was 37.8%.

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Turanza T005 with a result of 6.5 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 25.3%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
1 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 0%
2 Bridgestone Turanza T005 0%
3 Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 0%
4 Continental Premium Contact 6 0%
5 Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 0%
6 Nokian PowerProof 0%
7 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 0%
8 Falken Azenis FK510 0%
9 Maxxis Victra Sport 5 0%
10 GT-Radial SportActive 2 0%