Charts 2022 ViBilagare Eco Vs Normal Tyre Test

Below are all the data points for the 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.

How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental Premium Contact 6

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Toyo Proxes Comfort

Michelin Primacy 4

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Nokian Hakka Green 3

Continental EcoContact 6

Michelin e.Primacy

Petlas Imperium PT515

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Premium Contact 6 with a result of 34.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 9.8%.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian Hakka Blue 3 with a result of 28.6 M. The difference between best and worst was 25.1%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian Hakka Blue 3 with a result of 67.9 s. The difference between best and worst was 6.5%.

Wet Circle (s)

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Premium Contact 6 with a result of 20.5 s. The difference between best and worst was 7.2%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Primacy 4 with a result of 84.9 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 11.4%.

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Turanza T005 with a result of 69.8 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 8.3%.

Value Performance Overview

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Petlas Imperium PT515. The difference between best and worst was 44.5%.

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin e.Primacy with a result of 5.64 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 33.3%.

Fuel Consumption (l/100km)

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental EcoContact 6 with a result of 5.07 l/100km. The difference between best and worst was 7.7%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position	Tyre	Score
1	Continental Premium Contact 6	0%
2	Nokian Hakka Blue 3	0%
3	Bridgestone Turanza T005	0%
4	Toyo Proxes Comfort	0%
5	Michelin Primacy 4	0%
6	Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	0%
7	Nokian Hakka Green 3	0%
8	Continental EcoContact 6	0%
9	Michelin e.Primacy	0%
10	Petlas Imperium PT515	0%

2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test

Performance Overview

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry Handling (s)

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet Handling (s)

Wet Circle (s)

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Value Performance Overview

Price

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Fuel Consumption (l/100km)

Overall Findings

Similar Tyre Tests

Best Tyre Tests

Summer Tyre Tests

All Season Tyre Tests

Winter Tyre Tests

Features

Tyre Reviews

General