Menu

2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
8 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental Premium Contact 6
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Nokian Hakka Green 3
Continental EcoContact 6
Michelin e.Primacy
Petlas Imperium PT515

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Premium Contact 6 with a result of 34.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 9.8%.
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    34.2 M
  2. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    35 M
  3. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    35.1 M
  4. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    35.1 M
  5. Michelin Primacy 4
    35.3 M
  6. Michelin e.Primacy
    35.6 M
  7. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    36 M
  8. Continental EcoContact 6
    36.3 M
  9. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    37.5 M
  10. Petlas Imperium PT515
    37.9 M

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    107.1 s
  2. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    107.6 s
  3. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    107.7 s
  4. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    107.8 s
  5. Michelin Primacy 4
    107.8 s
  6. Continental EcoContact 6
    108.3 s
  7. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    108.3 s
  8. Michelin e.Primacy
    108.4 s
  9. Petlas Imperium PT515
    108.7 s
  10. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    109.4 s

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian Hakka Blue 3 with a result of 28.6 M. The difference between best and worst was 25.1%.
  1. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    28.6 M
  2. Continental Premium Contact 6
    29.8 M
  3. Michelin Primacy 4
    31.3 M
  4. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    31.7 M
  5. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    32 M
  6. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    33 M
  7. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    33.7 M
  8. Continental EcoContact 6
    34.2 M
  9. Michelin e.Primacy
    36.3 M
  10. Petlas Imperium PT515
    38.2 M

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian Hakka Blue 3 with a result of 67.9 s. The difference between best and worst was 6.5%.
  1. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    67.9 s
  2. Continental Premium Contact 6
    68.1 s
  3. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    68.2 s
  4. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    68.7 s
  5. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    68.9 s
  6. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    69.1 s
  7. Michelin Primacy 4
    69.1 s
  8. Continental EcoContact 6
    71.7 s
  9. Michelin e.Primacy
    72.4 s
  10. Petlas Imperium PT515
    72.6 s

Wet Circle (s)

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Premium Contact 6 with a result of 20.5 s. The difference between best and worst was 7.2%.
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    20.5 s
  2. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    20.6 s
  3. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    20.7 s
  4. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    20.7 s
  5. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    20.9 s
  6. Michelin Primacy 4
    21 s
  7. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    21.2 s
  8. Continental EcoContact 6
    21.6 s
  9. Michelin e.Primacy
    22 s
  10. Petlas Imperium PT515
    22.1 s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Primacy 4 with a result of 84.9 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 11.4%.
  1. Michelin Primacy 4
    84.9 Km/H
  2. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    81.8 Km/H
  3. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    81.8 Km/H
  4. Continental Premium Contact 6
    81.2 Km/H
  5. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    80.7 Km/H
  6. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    80.4 Km/H
  7. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    79.4 Km/H
  8. Petlas Imperium PT515
    78.4 Km/H
  9. Continental EcoContact 6
    77.7 Km/H
  10. Michelin e.Primacy
    75.2 Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Turanza T005 with a result of 69.8 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 8.3%.
  1. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    69.8 m/sec2
  2. Michelin Primacy 4
    68.9 m/sec2
  3. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    68.7 m/sec2
  4. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    67.9 m/sec2
  5. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    67.3 m/sec2
  6. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    67.3 m/sec2
  7. Continental Premium Contact 6
    67 m/sec2
  8. Petlas Imperium PT515
    66.6 m/sec2
  9. Continental EcoContact 6
    65.4 m/sec2
  10. Michelin e.Primacy
    64 m/sec2

Value Performance Overview

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Petlas Imperium PT515. The difference between best and worst was 44.5%.
  1. Petlas Imperium PT515
    621
  2. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    779
  3. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    869
  4. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    879
  5. Continental Premium Contact 6
    969
  6. Continental EcoContact 6
    989
  7. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    1019
  8. Michelin Primacy 4
    1039
  9. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    1069
  10. Michelin e.Primacy
    1119

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin e.Primacy with a result of 5.64 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 33.3%.
  1. Michelin e.Primacy
    5.64 kg / t
  2. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    6.29 kg / t
  3. Continental EcoContact 6
    6.48 kg / t
  4. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    7.12 kg / t
  5. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    7.15 kg / t
  6. Michelin Primacy 4
    7.87 kg / t
  7. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    8.22 kg / t
  8. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    8.23 kg / t
  9. Petlas Imperium PT515
    8.39 kg / t
  10. Continental Premium Contact 6
    8.46 kg / t

Fuel Consumption (l/100km)

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental EcoContact 6 with a result of 5.07 l/100km. The difference between best and worst was 7.7%.
  1. Continental EcoContact 6
    5.07 l/100km
  2. Michelin e.Primacy
    5.13 l/100km
  3. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    5.14 l/100km
  4. Nokian Hakka Green 3
    5.17 l/100km
  5. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    5.24 l/100km
  6. Continental Premium Contact 6
    5.26 l/100km
  7. Michelin Primacy 4
    5.29 l/100km
  8. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    5.41 l/100km
  9. Petlas Imperium PT515
    5.48 l/100km
  10. Nokian Hakka Blue 3
    5.49 l/100km

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Continental Premium Contact 6 0%
2 Nokian Hakka Blue 3 0%
3 Bridgestone Turanza T005 0%
4 Toyo Proxes Comfort 0%
5 Michelin Primacy 4 0%
6 Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 0%
7 Nokian Hakka Green 3 0%
8 Continental EcoContact 6 0%
9 Michelin e.Primacy 0%
10 Petlas Imperium PT515 0%

Similar Tyre Tests

Show All summer tyre tests
2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test
February 2026 225/40 R18 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 10 tyres
2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test
January 2026 235/35 R19 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 9 tyres
2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test
August 2025 225/40 R18 Pirelli P Zero PZ5 9 tyres
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test
August 2025 275/35 R19 Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 10 tyres
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs Bridgestone Potenza RE71 RS
June 2025 275/35 R19 Hoosier TrackAttack Pro 3 tyres
2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tyre Test
May 2025 295/30 R20 Continental SportContact 7 7 tyres
comments powered by Disqus