2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres

Below are all the data points for the 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental SportContact 7
Continental Premium Contact 6
Michelin e.Primacy
Falken e.Ziex
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Falken Azenis FK520
Maxxis Victra Sport VS5 SUV
Pirelli Scorpion Elect
GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 34.1 M. The difference between best and worst was 6.8%.

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 91.9 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 3.4%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin e.Primacy with a result of 23.9 M. The difference between best and worst was 11.2%.

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 51.6 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.8%.

Wet Circle (m/s)

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 8.97 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 6.6%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the straight aqua test finished less than 3% apart.

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 9.14 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 21.2%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value Performance Overview

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Maxxis Victra Sport VS5 SUV. The difference between best and worst was 55.8%.

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken e.Ziex with a result of 5.7 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 37.4%.

Energy Consumption (kWh/100km)

Energy consumption in kW hours per 100 km (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli Scorpion Elect with a result of 13.2 kWh/100km. The difference between best and worst was 18%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
1 Falken e.Ziex 98.2%
2 Michelin e.Primacy 97.7%
3 Pirelli Scorpion Elect 95.5%
4 Continental SportContact 7 95.1%
5 Continental Premium Contact 6 93.8%
6 Falken Azenis FK520 93.6%
7 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 92.8%
8 GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV 91%
9 Maxxis Victra Sport VS5 SUV 90.5%
10 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 89.3%

Test Winner

Falken e.Ziex
Falken e.Ziex

98.2%

comments powered by Disqus