Menu

2024 EV Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
8 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2024 EV Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Continental PremiumContact 7
Hankook iON evo SUV
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Falken e.Ziex
GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
Michelin Pilot Sport EV

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON evo SUV with a result of 33 M. The difference between best and worst was 12.9%.
  1. Hankook iON evo SUV
    33 M
  2. Continental PremiumContact 7
    33.2 M
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    33.9 M
  4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    34 M
  5. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    34.1 M
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    34.7 M
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    35 M
  8. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    37.2 M
  9. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    37.9 M

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 71.3 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 5.9%.
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    71.3 Km/H
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    70.9 Km/H
  3. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    70.7 Km/H
  4. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    70.4 Km/H
  5. Hankook iON evo SUV
    70.2 Km/H
  6. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    70.1 Km/H
  7. Falken e.Ziex
    69.6 Km/H
  8. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    67.6 Km/H
  9. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    67.1 Km/H

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 37.7 M. The difference between best and worst was 21.6%.
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    37.7 M
  2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    39.1 M
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    39.2 M
  4. Hankook iON evo SUV
    39.4 M
  5. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    39.4 M
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    42.4 M
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    43.3 M
  8. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    46 M
  9. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    48.1 M

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 59.2 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 8.3%.
  1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    59.2 Km/H
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    58.5 Km/H
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    58.3 Km/H
  4. Continental PremiumContact 7
    57.6 Km/H
  5. Hankook iON evo SUV
    57.1 Km/H
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    56.3 Km/H
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    56.2 Km/H
  8. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    55.2 Km/H
  9. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    54.3 Km/H

Wet Circle (s)

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 12.88 s. The difference between best and worst was 7.7%.
  1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    12.88 s
  2. Continental PremiumContact 7
    12.88 s
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    12.93 s
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    12.95 s
  5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    13.01 s
  6. Hankook iON evo SUV
    13.11 s
  7. Falken e.Ziex
    13.39 s
  8. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    13.45 s
  9. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    13.95 s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV with a result of 95.5 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 3.6%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    95.5 Km/H
  2. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    94.7 Km/H
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    94.6 Km/H
  4. Hankook iON evo SUV
    94.4 Km/H
  5. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    94.4 Km/H
  6. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    94.1 Km/H
  7. Continental PremiumContact 7
    93.4 Km/H
  8. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    93.2 Km/H
  9. Falken e.Ziex
    92.1 Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco with a result of 3.28 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 19.5%.
  1. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    3.28 m/sec2
  2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    3.27 m/sec2
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    3.25 m/sec2
  4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    3.24 m/sec2
  5. Hankook iON evo SUV
    2.99 m/sec2
  6. Continental PremiumContact 7
    2.96 m/sec2
  7. Falken e.Ziex
    2.94 m/sec2
  8. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    2.7 m/sec2
  9. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    2.64 m/sec2

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON evo SUV with a result of 68.6 dB. The difference between best and worst was 3.8%.
  1. Hankook iON evo SUV
    68.6 dB
  2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    70 dB
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    70 dB
  4. Falken e.Ziex
    70.2 dB
  5. Continental PremiumContact 7
    70.3 dB
  6. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    70.5 dB
  7. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    70.5 dB
  8. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    71.2 dB
  9. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    71.3 dB

Value Performance Overview

Wear (KM)

Predicted tread life in KM (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 36885 KM. The difference between best and worst was 49.8%.
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    36885 KM
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    35865 KM
  3. Hankook iON evo SUV
    35695 KM
  4. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    34905 KM
  5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    33015 KM
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    27375 KM
  7. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    27155 KM
  8. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    18530 KM

Value (Price/1000)

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco with a result of 14.55 Price/1000. The difference between best and worst was 62%.
  1. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    14.55 Price/1000
  2. Hankook iON evo SUV
    19.33 Price/1000
  3. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    19.48 Price/1000
  4. Continental PremiumContact 7
    20.2 Price/1000
  5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    21.05 Price/1000
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    23.01 Price/1000
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    23.42 Price/1000
  8. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    38.32 Price/1000

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken e.Ziex with a result of 5.55 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 39%.
  1. Falken e.Ziex
    5.55 kg / t
  2. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    6.17 kg / t
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    6.55 kg / t
  4. Continental PremiumContact 7
    6.64 kg / t
  5. Hankook iON evo SUV
    6.88 kg / t
  6. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    7.51 kg / t
  7. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    7.71 kg / t
  8. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    7.99 kg / t
  9. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    9.1 kg / t

Energy Consumption (kWh/100km)

Energy consumption in kW hours per 100 km (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken e.Ziex with a result of 18.28 kWh/100km. The difference between best and worst was 12.2%.
  1. Falken e.Ziex
    18.28 kWh/100km
  2. Continental PremiumContact 7
    18.46 kWh/100km
  3. Hankook iON evo SUV
    18.83 kWh/100km
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    19.17 kWh/100km
  5. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    19.88 kWh/100km
  6. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    20.02 kWh/100km
  7. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    20.66 kWh/100km
  8. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    20.82 kWh/100km

Abrasion (g)

Total weight loss after wear test in grams (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 1069 g. The difference between best and worst was 48.9%.
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    1069 g
  2. Hankook iON evo SUV
    1141 g
  3. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    1211 g
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    1211 g
  5. GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    1222 g
  6. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    1234 g
  7. Falken e.Ziex
    1244 g
  8. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    2093 g

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 0%
2 Continental PremiumContact 7 0%
3 Hankook iON evo SUV 0%
4 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 0%
5 Falken e.Ziex 0%
6 GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV 0%
7 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 0%
8 Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco 0%
9 Michelin Pilot Sport EV 0%

Similar Tyre Tests

Show All summer tyre tests
2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test
February 2026 225/40 R18 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 10 tyres
2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test
January 2026 235/35 R19 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 9 tyres
2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test
August 2025 225/40 R18 Pirelli P Zero PZ5 9 tyres
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test
August 2025 275/35 R19 Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 10 tyres
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs Bridgestone Potenza RE71 RS
June 2025 275/35 R19 Hoosier TrackAttack Pro 3 tyres
2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tyre Test
May 2025 295/30 R20 Continental SportContact 7 7 tyres
comments powered by Disqus