2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test

Below are all the data points for the 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Continental PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
Falken Azenis FK520
Triangle EffeXSport
Mastersteel Super Sport 2

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 33 M. The difference between best and worst was 10.6%.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Toyo Proxes Sport 2 with a result of 68.7 s. The difference between best and worst was 3.9%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 41.8 M. The difference between best and worst was 20.7%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 69.7 s. The difference between best and worst was 9.5%.

Wet Circle (s)

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 11.11 s. The difference between best and worst was 11.7%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Ultrac Pro with a result of 76.6 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 7.6%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 40%.

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Mastersteel Super Sport 2 with a result of 67 dB. The difference between best and worst was 5.6%.

Value Performance Overview

Wear (KM)

Predicted tread life in KM (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 50000 KM. The difference between best and worst was 60%.

Value (Price/1000)

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 13.3 Price/1000. The difference between best and worst was 37.8%.

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Mastersteel Super Sport 2 with a result of 7.35 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 27.6%.

Abrasion (mm/1000km)

Millimetre of tread lost per 1000km driven (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Triangle EffeXSport with a result of 0.185 mm/1000km. The difference between best and worst was 54.1%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
1 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 0%
2 Continental PremiumContact 7 0%
3 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 0%
4 Michelin Pilot Sport 5 0%
5 Pirelli P Zero PZ4 0%
6 Vredestein Ultrac Pro 0%
7 Toyo Proxes Sport 2 0%
8 Falken Azenis FK520 0%
9 Triangle EffeXSport 0%
10 Mastersteel Super Sport 2 0%
comments powered by Disqus