Menu

2025 Teknikens Varld Summer Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
5 min read
Below are all the data points for the 2025 Teknikens Varld Summer Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Pirelli Scorpion
Michelin e.Primacy
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Continental PremiumContact 7
Nexen N Fera Sport SUV
Nokian Hakka Black 3 SUV
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 21.75 M. The difference between best and worst was 12.9%.
  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    21.75 M
  2. Pirelli Scorpion
    21.87 M
  3. Continental PremiumContact 7
    21.9 M
  4. Michelin e.Primacy
    22.35 M
  5. Nokian Hakka Black 3 SUV
    22.55 M
  6. Nexen N Fera Sport SUV
    23 M
  7. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    23.4 M
  8. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    24.96 M

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin e.Primacy with a result of 24.64 M. The difference between best and worst was 8.6%.
  1. Michelin e.Primacy
    24.64 M
  2. Nexen N Fera Sport SUV
    24.73 M
  3. Pirelli Scorpion
    24.75 M
  4. Nokian Hakka Black 3 SUV
    25.21 M
  5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    25.41 M
  6. Continental PremiumContact 7
    26.18 M
  7. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    26.88 M
  8. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    26.97 M

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli Scorpion with a result of 38.71 s. The difference between best and worst was 5.2%.
  1. Pirelli Scorpion
    38.71 s
  2. Continental PremiumContact 7
    39.33 s
  3. Nokian Hakka Black 3 SUV
    39.34 s
  4. Michelin e.Primacy
    39.44 s
  5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    39.49 s
  6. Nexen N Fera Sport SUV
    39.94 s
  7. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    40.83 s
  8. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    40.85 s

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin e.Primacy with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 40%.
  1. Michelin e.Primacy
    10 Points
  2. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    9 Points
  3. Nexen N Fera Sport SUV
    8 Points
  4. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    8 Points
  5. Continental PremiumContact 7
    8 Points
  6. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    7 Points
  7. Pirelli Scorpion
    7 Points
  8. Nokian Hakka Black 3 SUV
    6 Points

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Pirelli Scorpion 0%
2 Michelin e.Primacy 0%
3 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 0%
4 Continental PremiumContact 7 0%
5 Nexen N Fera Sport SUV 0%
6 Nokian Hakka Black 3 SUV 0%
7 Michelin CrossClimate 2 0%
8 Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco 0%
comments powered by Disqus