Menu

2025 AutoView Sports Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read
Below are all the data points for the 2025 AutoView Sports Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Hankook Ventus Evo
Continental SportContact 7
Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
Pirelli P Zero PZ4

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 3.97 M (11.9%) | Avg: 34.76 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 with a result of 33.38 M. The difference between best and worst was 10.6%.
  1. Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
    33.38 M
  2. Continental SportContact 7
    33.5 M
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    34.78 M
  4. Hankook Ventus Evo
    34.78 M
  5. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    37.35 M

Dry Handling (s)

Spread: 3.28 s (3.8%) | Avg: 87.25 s

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 85.95 s. The difference between best and worst was 3.7%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    85.95 s
  2. Continental SportContact 7
    86.46 s
  3. Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
    86.98 s
  4. Hankook Ventus Evo
    87.62 s
  5. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    89.23 s

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Spread: 5.40 Points (36%) | Avg: 13.32 Points

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 15 Points. The difference between best and worst was 36%.
  1. Continental SportContact 7
    15 Points
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    15 Points
  3. Hankook Ventus Evo
    13.5 Points
  4. Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
    13.5 Points
  5. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    9.6 Points

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 4.37 M (19.9%) | Avg: 23.68 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 21.91 M. The difference between best and worst was 16.6%.
  1. Continental SportContact 7
    21.91 M
  2. Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
    22.64 M
  3. Hankook Ventus Evo
    22.93 M
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    24.64 M
  5. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    26.28 M

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Spread: 0.40 Points (5.8%) | Avg: 6.66 Points

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 6.9 Points. The difference between best and worst was 5.8%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    6.9 Points
  2. Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
    6.7 Points
  3. Hankook Ventus Evo
    6.6 Points
  4. Continental SportContact 7
    6.6 Points
  5. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    6.5 Points

Noise (dB)

Spread: 1.40 dB (2.3%) | Avg: 62.52 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the noise test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    61.8 dB
  2. Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
    62.2 dB
  3. Continental SportContact 7
    62.7 dB
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    62.7 dB
  5. Hankook Ventus Evo
    63.2 dB

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 0%
2 Continental SportContact 7 0%
3 Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 0%
4 Hankook Ventus Evo 0%
5 Pirelli P Zero PZ4 0%

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.