Menu
Avon ZZS View Gallery (1)
185-255/40-55 R13-17 9 sizes 2018

Avon ZZS

Avon Tyres Trackday and Competition Summer

The Avon ZZS is a Trackday and Competition Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

3.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
70%
Wet Grip
70%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
80%
Wear
0%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
70%
1 Reviews
75% Average
100 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 30th)
Avon ZZS

Avon ZZS

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
3.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
73.1
2x / 1 test
Dry
72.4
1.8x / 1 test
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
72.8
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 1
Avg Rating: 75%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.69
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 30/49 2 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
30th
Average
30th
Best
30th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test
245/45 R18 • 2020
30th/49
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
245/50 R 13 93 V D C 71
185/55 R 13 83 W XL D C 71
215/55 R 13 88 W D C 71
15 inch
195/50 R 15 86 W XL D C 71
245/40 R 15 88 W D C 71
16 inch
195/50 R 16 88 V XL D C 71
225/45 R 16 93 W XL D C 71
17 inch
225/45 R 17 94 V XL D C 71
255/40 R 17 98 W XL D C 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Avon ZZS >>

Questions and Answers for the Avon ZZS

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Avon ZZS. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Have you driven on the Avon ZZS tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Avon ZZS? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Avon ZZS >

Latest Avon ZZS Reviews

Given 75% while driving a Renault (195/50 R15) on track for 100 spirited miles
Had these tyres on a clio 182 used for sprints and hillclimbs, they had good grip and were predictable but do require a little warming up, very good handling due to a very stiff sidewall, good grip in the dry and wet for a 1b list tyre but didn’t compare to the a052 in the dry but do last a lot longer.
Ask a question | Helpful 881
November 13, 2023