Menu

Falken Azenis FK510 Owner Reviews

Review this tyre

What owners say summarised from 142 reviews

Owners broadly rate the Falken Azenis FK510 as a grippy, confidence-inspiring ultra-high-performance tyre, with strong praise for dry grip and consistently good wet grip. Around a quarter to a third of owners also highlight strong value for money, plus generally good ride comfort and acceptable-to-quiet road noise. The main recurring drawback is wear: around one in five owners complain of short tread life, and a smaller group also report that performance can tail off as the tyre gets worn.

What owners mention most counted across 143 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 156 ratings

  • Owner score 81%
  • Dry Grip 88%
  • Wet Grip 87%
  • Road Feedback 82%
  • Handling 81%
  • Comfort 76%
  • Wear 71%

Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews - Page 12

Score spread across 133 written reviews
92%
Hubs
Took the horrible Dunlop SportMaxx tyres off (getting a bit thin anyway) and chose these Falkens as I have had great results with these make of tyres on other cars. I am not disappointed. They are significantly quieter, with better grip in the wet than the Dunlops. The initial turn in is sharper with more feedback too and, more importantly, they don't suffer as much from the dreaded Dunlop flatspotting. Grip in the dry is fine too, with about the same firmness as the Dunlops, but eliminating high frequency bumps completely. I don't know about longevity as they haven't been on long enough. From this initial report I would definitely buy them again.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 168
91%
Member
  • BMW 520d
  • 225/50 R17
  • 20,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Average
20K miles on the rear of BMW 520D. First set of non-runflats on the car and performed better than almost every other premium brand (run-flat) tyre I've had. lasted 20K miles - up to 4 times longer than some previous sets. would definitely buy again.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 191
93%
Member
Great tire! Quieter and more grippy than previous pirelies i had. Great control and stability even at the speeds over 120mph.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 156

Which tyres do you drive?

Researching the Falken Azenis FK510? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Falken Azenis FK510?
83%
Member
Good tire, better than Nokian zLine, but wear is bad, after 11000km I have left 4mm for fronts and 5mm for rear tires. Otherwise great tire even on some gravel.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 7
Helpful 150
100%
Member
  • 225/45 R17 W
  • 500 miles
  • Mostly Motorways
  • Average
Wet and dry grip of the tires are amazing.They added +30 km at the turns. Fuel consumption is much more lower than the previous tires. Tires are also silent.They fitted so well on my Bmw 330xd coupe. I ve just made 500 km i cant say anything about the wear for now. If u have a sport car you should try those tires. I ll definetely buy those tires again.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 148
75%
Member
The grip in both dry and wet is very good, no wheelspin wel accelerating hard.

But they are very uncomfortable, the rolling noise is very loud comparing to my previous Continental tyres. On bad roads its even more uncomfortable because you notice every pothole.

Also much more fuel consumption, i didnt expected that a tyre with EU label E would so much more fuel then a EU label B tyre.

Not a good tyre for your daily comfortable car like my Audi A4.

Next time i would go for a premium tyre again like Michelin, Continetal or Goodyear. tyres from the big brands are just a bit better, and thats why they are a bit more expensive.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 199
79%
Member
This tyre is excellent in the wet and dry, I have read reviews in which these tyres have lost out to the bigger brands on the dry tests but I think in normal operation these differences are so small very few people will ever notice the difference between a Falken and Continental. They do have a lot of grip but can feel a little plastic on the limit.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 3
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 199
90%
Member
Falkens replaced the factory fitted pirellis cinturato p7 ecoimpact in 16.000miles, which were pretty good actually in all aspects but after the first 8.000 miles have developped a drowning noise in 40mph and around 60mph.The 510 is actually a little better in everything, especially in the wet than the p7.it handles very well both in dry and wet ,it doesn't spin from a standstill as the p7 did, it is silent and comfortable-can't tell about the wear though-it's too early. the only thing that the tyre lacks as opposed to the p7 is steering response where although an XL tyre,when driving it really hard response is slower than pirellis and needs more lock.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 191
87%
Member
I have changed all four tires to Falken 510 and drove this Tyre for 2000 miles ,I felt the grip was good in both wet and dry also my car progress is good.Good tires for the price and quality as premium tires.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 189
93%
Member
  • BMW 320 d
  • 225/40 R18 W
  • 3,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Average
After 3000 miles the first signs are good. Fantastic dry grip and very good in the wet, nice even tyre wear and they seem to absorb the road really well overall I have nothing but positive feedback for these tyres I would definitely buy again..
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 153
85%
Member
I have this tire only for a month, but I encourage You to buy, and also share your impressions here. In the same summer conditions it adds 15 kmh in corners regarding the winter tire. I think i makes more noise at 90 than i imagined, but also absorbs the bumps better than softer winter tires did. I hold 2,6 bars on my 1,6 t weight car. please share your impressions and the pressure too!
Overall I spent a lot of time choosing, and I m happy with my decision. I prefer not the 3 main brands, but i did not wanted made in china stuff. This tire costs 30€ less than conti and 20€ less than hankook which i was consdidering.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 196
100%
Member
Better than Pirelli
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 1,652
Find your next tyre
All tyre tests
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.