- Jaguar xf premium luxury
- 255/35 R20 W
- 1,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Falken Azenis FK510 Owner Reviews
Review this tyreWhat owners say summarised from 142 reviews
Owners broadly rate the Falken Azenis FK510 as a grippy, confidence-inspiring ultra-high-performance tyre, with strong praise for dry grip and consistently good wet grip. Around a quarter to a third of owners also highlight strong value for money, plus generally good ride comfort and acceptable-to-quiet road noise. The main recurring drawback is wear: around one in five owners complain of short tread life, and a smaller group also report that performance can tail off as the tyre gets worn.
What owners mention most counted across 143 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 156 ratings
- Owner score 81%
- Dry Grip 88%
- Wet Grip 87%
- Road Feedback 82%
- Handling 81%
- Comfort 76%
- Wear 71%
Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews - Page 12
- BMW 520d
- 225/50 R17
- 20,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Mercedes Benz 190 2.3 16
- 285/30 R19 W
- 3,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Falken Azenis FK510? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Honda Accord Euro
- 225/50 R17 W
- 6,835 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- 225/45 R17 W
- 500 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
- Audi A4 1.8T Quattro
- 225/40 R18 W
- 1,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
But they are very uncomfortable, the rolling noise is very loud comparing to my previous Continental tyres. On bad roads its even more uncomfortable because you notice every pothole.
Also much more fuel consumption, i didnt expected that a tyre with EU label E would so much more fuel then a EU label B tyre.
Not a good tyre for your daily comfortable car like my Audi A4.
Next time i would go for a premium tyre again like Michelin, Continetal or Goodyear. tyres from the big brands are just a bit better, and thats why they are a bit more expensive.
- BMW 325 coupe
- 225/45 R17 W
- 3,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Skoda Octavia
- 225/45 R17
- 2,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Mazda 6
- 225/45 R18 W
- Mostly Town
- Average
- BMW 320 d
- 225/40 R18 W
- 3,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Volvo s60 D5 (163)
- 225/45 R17 W
- 200 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
Overall I spent a lot of time choosing, and I m happy with my decision. I prefer not the 3 main brands, but i did not wanted made in china stuff. This tire costs 30€ less than conti and 20€ less than hankook which i was consdidering.
- Honda Civic Type R
- 225/45 R17
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tyre
All tyre testsThe latest Tyre Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tyres for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tyres Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27 →
Summer Tyres
All Season Tyres
Winter Tyres
SUV and All Terrain Tyres
Track Tyres
Which tyres do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tyres.

