P36 of 50
Beat 29% of the field
Viking ProTech HP Test Results
Tested 2016 to 2020
1 publication
Tested 4 times by independent publications, the Viking ProTech HP averages a finish of 33rd.
- 4Independent tests
- 0Test wins
- 0Podium finishes
- 33rdAverage finish
- 31%Field beaten on average
- 1Publications
4 tests, 2016 to 2020
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 31%
Record by discipline
Where the Viking ProTech HP finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 2 | P43.5 of 47 | 7% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 2 | P34 of 47 | 28% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Viking ProTech HP. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Gislaved Ultra Speed
4 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind
|
4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 33% |
 Uniroyal RainSport 3
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
|
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Falken Azenis FK510
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 BFGoodrich gGrip
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Sava Intensa UHP 2
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Continental Premium Contact 6
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Toyo Proxes Sport
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Semperit SpeedLife 2
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Fulda SportControl 2
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 4 tests. Updated November 11, 2025.
Across four Auto Bild summer braking-focused tests, the Viking ProTech HP consistently placed in the lower half to bottom third of the fields, indicating weak all-round braking performance. Wet braking appears particularly problematic with large deficits to the best, while dry braking is also below par. There is a slight sign of relative competitiveness in older, mixed-size fields (2016), but results since 2017 show persistent underperformance, especially in wet conditions.
Performance Strengths
-
Value/Competitiveness in Large Fields
Minor
Details
- 20/50 overall in 2016 Market Overview - Braking Test
- 31/43 overall in 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Shootout
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet Weather Performance
Strong
Details
- Wet braking 38/45 (+27.2% from best) in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout
- Wet braking 30/49 (+21.3% from best) in 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test
-
Dry Braking Performance
Strong
Details
- Dry braking 43/45 (+13.7% from best) in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout
- Dry braking 44/49 (+16.2% from best) in 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test
-
Overall Braking-Test Competitiveness
Strong
Details
- 46/45 overall in 2019 braking shootout (did not progress)
- 36/49 overall in 2020 braking overview
Every test, newest first 4
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2020 1 test
2019 1 test
P46 of 53
Beat 7% of the field
2017 1 test
P31 of 51
Beat 33% of the field
2016 1 test
P20 of 50
Beat 53% of the field
Back to the Viking ProTech HP overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Viking tyres