Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Toyo Proxes Comfort
- TR Score
- 9.0/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 129
- TR Score
- 8.4/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 19
In the 11 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead 8 times and the Proxes Comfort 3 times. The EfficientGrip Performance 2 lasted 63.3% longer in the wear tests; the Proxes Comfort stopped 1.2% shorter in the dry.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 for mixed-weather safety, long motorway miles, and lowest total cost of ownership. Pick Toyo Proxes Comfort if you drive mostly in the dry, want sharp dry stops and a lower upfront price.
Where the EfficientGrip Performance 2 is stronger
- Excellent longevity and lowest wear in multiple tests (often 50-85% higher mileage than Toyo)
- Consistently stronger wet performance (notably shorter wet braking and secure wet handling)
- Low rolling resistance for better fuel efficiency
Where the Proxes Comfort is stronger
- Short dry braking and frequent dry test wins
- Balanced, easygoing manners with good comfort
- Often lower purchase price
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Proxes Comfort at a glance
| Category | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Gap | Proxes Comfort |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won11 shared tests | 8 | 3 | |
| Dry19 measurements | 6 | The Proxes Comfort stopped 1.2% shorter in the dry (11 tests) | 13 |
| Wet38 measurements | 19 | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped 1.6% shorter in the wet (11 tests) | 17 |
| Comfort10 measurements | 5 | 2 | |
| Value14 measurements | 14 | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 lasted 63.3% longer in the wear tests (4 tests) | 0 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.0/10 | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 by 0.6 | 8.4/10 |
| Owner rating129 and 19 reviews | 85% | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 by 4 points | 81% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 81% | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 by 2 points | 79% |
| Pricein the 7 tests that listed prices | +19.1% | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 was dearer in 6 of 7 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 37 | 26 sizes made in both | 63 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 11 tests, 2021 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Field | Proxes Comfort |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | P5 of 10 | P8 of 10 | |
| 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | P4 of 20 | P7 of 20 | |
| 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview | P13 of 55 | P6 of 55 | |
| 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | P1 of 50 | P14 of 50 | |
| Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres | P4 of 13 | P9 of 13 | |
| 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test | P6 of 10 | P4 of 10 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | P1 of 21 | P11 of 21 | |
| 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview | P16 of 50 | P9 of 50 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | P9 of 20 | P11 of 20 | |
| 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | P4 of 11 | P11 of 11 | |
| 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test | P13 of 53 | P17 of 53 |
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 11 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Proxes Comfort
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Proxes Comfort
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Proxes Comfort
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the Proxes Comfort 81% from 19. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Gap | Proxes Comfort | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36.82 | 1.2% | 36.39 | 3-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 79.83 | 0.4% | 79.99 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 100.2 | 0.4% | 100.7 | 1-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.9% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37.94 | 1.6% | 38.66 | 6-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36 | 7.2% | 38.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 76.86 | 0.9% | 77.69 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.58 | 0.2% | 72.5 | 2-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.28 | 0.8% | 6.32 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16.24 | = | 16.2 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 81.55 | 0.9% | 80.88 | 4-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16.16 | 4.4% | 16.11 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 3.3% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.39 | 0.3 dB | 70.71 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.03 | 0.8% | 8.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52,558 | 63.3% | 32,518 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.55 | 10.6% | 8.47 | 7-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.42 | 3.4% | 5.61 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 61.3 | 19.2% | 75.9 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 9 and the Proxes Comfort 8.4 out of 10.
| EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Category | Proxes Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75 | Dry | 80 | ||
| 75 | Wet | 64 | ||
| 86 | Comfort | 54 | ||
| 92 | Value | 54 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Category | Proxes Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Dry Grip | 8.4 | ||
| 8.6 | Wet Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 8 | Road Feedback | 8 | ||
| 8.4 | Handling | 7.5 | ||
| 9.1 | Wear | 8.4 | ||
| 8.5 | Comfort | 8.3 | ||
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the Proxes Comfort 81% from 19. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
- 85%from 129 reviews
- 81%would buy again
- 1,831,837 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners largely describe the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 as a quiet, very comfortable touring tyre with standout longevity, reflected in the strong average score (81.1%) and the high share of positive reviews (90 of 113). Around four in ten owners specifically praise its tread life, and many also report confident dry and wet grip for everyday road use. The main reservation is that a noticeable minority (around one in five) find the steering feel a bit vague, and a smaller group mention a soft sidewall or occasional stability/feedback issues at speed.
- Low road noise for a touring tyre
- Comfortable, supple ride over bumps and poor surfaces
- Excellent tread life and slow wear rate
- Strong dry grip with a safe, dependable feel
- Vague or less direct steering feel
- Soft sidewalls can feel imprecise or allow more movement in corners
- Wet braking can be underwhelming for some drivers
Summarised by AI from 113 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 129 EfficientGrip Performance 2 reviewsThe Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2’s were excellent. I like them so much that I’m onto my third pair across two cars. They improved my fuel efficiency significantly, were stubborn to wear away, all whilst providing reassuring grip whatever the weather. I’d driven over 40k miles on this set and have only just replaced them due to shoulder wear from needing an alignment. No doubt they’d have lasted over 50k miles otherwise! They’re not a budget tyre but you soon recoup the added purchase cost through not having to replace as frequently and saving on fuel.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
- 81%from 19 reviews
- 79%would buy again
- 229,500 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Toyo Proxes Comfort delivers strong wet and dry grip with stable, predictable handling, often comparing it favorably to premium brands for the money. Many also highlight a quiet, comfortable ride and good wear rates/tread life for its price class. A smaller minority note it's more suited to calm daily driving, with reduced feedback and earlier understeer when pushed hard.
- Strong wet grip and confidence in rain
- Good dry grip and stable handling
- Quiet ride and good comfort (especially on motorways)
- Excellent value for money versus premium alternatives
- Limited feedback/less suitable for sporty driving (can understeer or feel less confident when pushed)
Summarised by AI from 17 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 19 Proxes Comfort reviewsThis is my first set of Toyo Proxes, they have really impressed me so far i'm around 5000+ miles with them on the rear of my BMW 3 series. I have cheap Chinese Mazzini tyres on the front that came with then car (Don't buy them!) they are awful, but highlight the difference between cheap budget tyres and good mid range. The front end feels honestly bad while the Toyos on the rear feel super planted, it's a genuine noticeable difference. The Toyos are so good in wet and dry they always feel stable and have loads of grip. I ran them trough winter with no issues never lost traction. I drive lots of twisty B roads they are actually pretty fun to drive on given the comfort bias which is also really good. They soak up bumps and potholes really well and are very quiet. Im really blown away by how good they are i've always fitted premium brands (Michelin, Bridgestone, Goodyear) but the Toyos are actually my favourite so far. I Guess tread life might be the only differentiator but so far after 5000 miles they look as good as the day they were put on.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 37 sizes of the EfficientGrip Performance 2 and 63 of the Proxes Comfort, 26 of them made in both.
| Category | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Proxes Comfort |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 37 sizes, 15 to 21 inch | 63 sizes, 14 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 26 sizes 185/65 R15195/65 R15195/50 R16195/55 R16195/60 R16205/45 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16215/45 R16215/55 R16215/60 R16215/65 R16and 14 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A88%B12% | A100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | A53%B34%C13% | C74%D26% |
| EU label noise | 67-71 dB B52%A48% | 70-71 dB B100% |
| Replaced | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance (2021) | Toyo Proxes CF2 |
| Awards | Highly Recommended: Best Tyres for Large Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Commended: Best Tyres for Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2024/25) Winner: Summer Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2022) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 was the dearer tyre in 6 of the 7 tests that listed prices, by 19.1% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Goodyear's EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Toyo's Proxes Comfort both target the premium-touring summer segment for everyday passenger cars, but they take different routes to deliver comfort and safety. Across 11 shared professional tests, the Goodyear consistently blends strong wet-road security with standout efficiency and class-leading longevity, while Toyo leans into accessible pricing, easygoing manners and often sharp dry stopping.
This head-to-head reveals a clear pattern: Toyo frequently nicks short-distance wins in dry braking and occasionally in dry handling, but Goodyear repeatedly pulls ahead in wet braking/handling consistency, rolling resistance, wear, and overall value once mileage is factored in. If you prioritize long-term running costs and wet-road confidence, the data points one way; if you want lower upfront cost and crisp dry stops, it points another.
Conclusion
Synthesizing the results, Goodyear delivers the more rounded touring proposition: safer and more stable in the wet on average, markedly lower rolling resistance, and exceptional tread life that repeatedly turns a higher purchase price into the best long-term value. It also maintains low noise and good comfort, reinforcing its road-trip-friendly brief.
Toyo can appeal if your priorities are short dry braking, agreeable everyday comfort and a lower initial price. However, its wet braking is more variable across tests and its wear rates are consistently lower, which can erode the apparent price advantage over time. In practical terms: Goodyear is the safer bet for mixed-weather driving and cost-per-mile; Toyo suits drivers in predominantly dry climates who value upfront savings and taut dry responses.
EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Proxes Comfort: your questions
Is the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 or the Toyo Proxes Comfort the better tyre?
In the 11 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead 8 times and the Proxes Comfort 3 times. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 9 and the Proxes Comfort 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 or the Proxes Comfort?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 led 19 of the 38 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.6% shorter in the wet across 11 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Proxes Comfort led 13 of the 19 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.2% shorter in the dry across 11 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 lasted 63.3% longer in the wear tests (4 tests), had 10.6% lower rolling resistance (7 tests) and used 3.4% less fuel (2 tests). Owners rate wear 9.1/10 for the EfficientGrip Performance 2 and 8.4/10 for the Proxes Comfort.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the EfficientGrip Performance 2 and 8.3/10 for the Proxes Comfort.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the Proxes Comfort 81% from 19. 81% of EfficientGrip Performance 2 owners would buy it again, against 79% for the Proxes Comfort.
Which is more expensive?
In the 7 tests that listed prices, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 was the dearer tyre in 6 of them, by 19.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 is made in 37 sizes (15 to 21 inch) and the Proxes Comfort in 63 (14 to 20 inch). 26 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the EfficientGrip Performance 2 is graded A for wet grip and A for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Proxes Comfort A and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4+
2-5 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
5-8 in 14 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
10-6 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy
3-1 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the EfficientGrip Performance 2 Review the Proxes Comfort
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion