Menu

Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs One

Jonathan Benson
Tested and written by Jonathan Benson
4 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Snow Data
  3. Results
  4. Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
  5. Nokian WR G4 SUV
  6. Nokian Outpost nAT
  7. Nokian One

The new Nokian Outpost nAT claims to be an all terrain tyre you can use in snow, but how good is it? Nokian invented winter tyres, so they're pretty confident, so confident in fact they suggested we test it against the king of winter tyres, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5, along with their much loved all weather tyre, the Nokian WRG4 SUV, and their high mileage all season tyre, the Nokian One SUV.

Before we start, it's worth noting that three of the tyres are 3PMSF marked, which is the 3 peak mountain snowflake symbol, sometimes called "severe snow rating". The Winter, All Weather and All Terrain tyres carry the 3PMSF marking, but the all season does not. The test size was 265/65 R17, and we used a Toyota Hilux for the test in RWD only mode.

Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs One

Test Publication:
265/65 R17 4 tyres 1 categories
Test Size: 265/65 R17
Tyres Tested: 4 tyres
Test Categories:
1 categories (3 tests)
Similar Tests

Snow Data

Snow traction is a difficult test for a tyre, especially on an unloaded pickup, so it gave us the largest differences between the tyres. The Winter was naturally the best, with the all weather around 18% slower in the acceleration test, the all terrain was 12% behind the all weather, and the all season another 11% behind the all terrain.

Snow Traction

Spread: 3.52 s (71.5%)|Avg: 6.53 s
Snow acceleration time (5 - 35 km/h) [Average Temperature -8c] (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
    4.92 s
  2. Nokian WR G4 SUV
    5.80 s
  3. Nokian Outpost nAT
    6.96 s
  4. Nokian One
    8.44 s

Interestingly while the order remained the same for snow braking, the extra weight over the primary axle helped the all terrain finish closer to the all weather, and significantly ahead of the all season.

Snow Braking

Spread: 8.58 M (56.1%)|Avg: 20.01 M
Snow braking in meters (40 - 5 km/h) [Average Temperature -8c] (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
    15.30 M
  2. Nokian WR G4 SUV
    20.14 M
  3. Nokian Outpost nAT
    20.72 M
  4. Nokian One
    23.88 M

While the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was unsurprisingly the fastest around the lap, the real brilliance of a full winter tyre came in the subjective handling - the confidence you felt on the Hakka R5 was unrivaled. The all terrain was close to the all weather in time, but the all weather tyre felt more balanced around the lap.

Snow Handling

Spread: 15.40 s (17.2%)|Avg: 97.89 s
Snow handling time in seconds [Average Temperature -8c] (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
    89.60 s
  2. Nokian WR G4 SUV
    98.30 s
  3. Nokian Outpost nAT
    98.65 s
  4. Nokian One
    105.00 s

Results

1st

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

265/65 R17
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 1st 15.3 M 100%
Snow Traction 1st 4.92 s 100%
Snow Handling 1st 89.6 s 100%
2nd

Nokian WR G4 SUV

265/65 R17
Nokian WR G4 SUV
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 2nd 20.14 M 15.3 M +4.84 M 75.97%
Snow Traction 2nd 5.8 s 4.92 s +0.88 s 84.83%
Snow Handling 2nd 98.3 s 89.6 s +8.7 s 91.15%
3rd

Nokian Outpost nAT

265/65 R17
Nokian Outpost nAT
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 3rd 20.72 M 15.3 M +5.42 M 73.84%
Snow Traction 3rd 6.96 s 4.92 s +2.04 s 70.69%
Snow Handling 3rd 98.65 s 89.6 s +9.05 s 90.83%
4th

Nokian One

265/65 R17
Nokian One
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 4th 23.88 M 15.3 M +8.58 M 64.07%
Snow Traction 4th 8.44 s 4.92 s +3.52 s 58.29%
Snow Handling 4th 105 s 89.6 s +15.4 s 85.33%

comments powered by Disqus