Menu

2017 Summer SUV Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
4 min read Updated
Contents
  1. The Results
  2. Continental Premium Contact 6
  3. Nokian Hakka Black
  4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
  5. Dunlop SP QuattroMaxx
  6. Nexen N Fera RU1

Test Summary
Wet Braking Continental Premium Contact 6
Dry Braking Nokian Hakka Black
Rolling Resistance Continental Premium Contact 6
Noise Nokian Hakka Black
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Dunlop SP QuattroMaxx
Nexen N Fera RU1
Snow Handling Continental Premium Contact 6
Nokian Hakka Black
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Dunlop SP QuattroMaxx
Nexen N Fera RU1
With the SUV sector booming, tyre manufacturers are starting to merge their car and SUV lines into one product. The latest, and according to this test by the Swedish magazine Vi Bilägare, greatest example of this, is the new Continental Premium Contact 6.

While only five patterns of tyres were tested, it was a good mix of 235/40 R18 tyres which are usually fitted to vehicles like the VW Tiguan and Volvo XC70.

The premium manufacturers were represented by Continental and Dunlop, the mid range by Hankook and Nokian, and the quickly improving Nexen represented the cheapest end of the market.

The results were surprisingly close overall. Nokian took the overall wet victory, and while the Continental was close in the wet handling test, the Nokian was in a league of its own during the wet braking tests. Hankook dominated the aquaplaning tests, with Nokian, Dunlop and Nexen close, and Continental performing the worse in the deep water testing.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian Hakka Black
    70.47 s
  2. Continental Premium Contact 6
    71.50 s
  3. Dunlop SP QuattroMaxx
    72.45 s
  4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
    72.52 s
  5. Nexen N Fera RU1
    73.62 s

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian Hakka Black
    43.10 M
  2. Continental Premium Contact 6
    46.50 M
  3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
    46.60 M
  4. Dunlop SP QuattroMaxx
    47.40 M
  5. Nexen N Fera RU1
    49.60 M

During the dry tests, the new Continental showed how sacrificing a little aquaplaning performance can drastically change the dry results, where it dominated in both the dry braking and dry handling tests.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    93.65 s
  2. Dunlop SP QuattroMaxx
    94.39 s
  3. Nokian Hakka Black
    94.39 s
  4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
    95.04 s
  5. Nexen N Fera RU1
    95.25 s

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    35.80 M
  2. Nokian Hakka Black
    36.90 M
  3. Dunlop SP QuattroMaxx
    37.30 M
  4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
    37.50 M
  5. Nexen N Fera RU1
    38.30 M

The difference in fuel consumption between the tyres was only 0.15 litres per 100/km. While Nexen won this category, it wasn't enough of a difference to have the magazine recommend the Nexen above any other tyre on test.

Lastly, all five tyres had similar results in the noise tests, but the Continental struggled a little in the subjective comfort testing.

The Results

Continental Premium Contact 6
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 83
Dry 20
Wet 43
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 10
Noise 4
2nd

Nokian Hakka Black

235/50 R18
Nokian Hakka Black
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 82
Dry 16
Wet 46
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 4
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 78
Dry 16
Wet 42
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 4
4th

Dunlop SP QuattroMaxx

235/50 R18
Dunlop SP QuattroMaxx
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 64
Dry 16
Wet 32
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 4
Noise 4
5th

Nexen N Fera RU1

235/50 R18
Nexen N Fera RU1
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 56
Dry 12
Wet 26
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 4

comments powered by Disqus