Menu
Nexen N Fera RU1 View Gallery (1)
205-285/35-65 R16-20 101 sizes 2013

Nexen N Fera RU1

The Nexen N Fera RU1 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

7.1
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
75%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
71%
Wear
78%
Comfort
76%
Buy again
72%
25 Reviews
75% Average
159,915 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 7th)
Nexen N Fera RU1

Nexen N Fera RU1

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Off road
65.8
0.53x / 4 tests
Comfort
64.4
0.29x / 1 test
Wet
54.6
2x / 6 tests
Dry
46.3
1.8x / 6 tests
Value
43.7
0.38x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
72.9
3 tests
Braking
51.7
6 tests
Handling
50.3
6 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 2
Period: 2017 - 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 25
Avg Rating: 75.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.42
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2019 225/55 R17 8/10 12 metrics
2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test 2017 235/35 R19 8/9 3 metrics
2017 Summer SUV Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2017 235/50 R18 5/5 4 metrics
3
Tests
7th
Average
5th
Best
8th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
8th/10
Acceptable handling on dry and wet roads, high grip on sand and gravel.
Long wet braking, highest rolling resistance.
Good.
2017 Summer SUV Tyre Test
235/50 R18 • 2017
5th/5
Low noise level, low fuel consumption
Long braking distance and poor handling on wet surfaces
2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test
235/35 R19 • 2017
8th/9

Alternative Tyres

7.6/10
85% 16 reviews
7.2/10
94% 5 reviews
6.7/10
81% 17 reviews
6.6/10
83% 8 reviews
6.6/10
82% 6 reviews
6.5/10
75% 11 reviews
6.5/10
74% 12 reviews
6.1/10
86% 22 reviews
66% 4 reviews
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
215/60R16 99 H C C 71
17 inch
235/65R17 108 V XL C A 72
235/65R17 104 H C B 69
225/60R17 99 H D B 68
205/50R17 93 V XL D A 69
225/50R17 94 W C B 70
225/60R17 99 H D B 68
235/65R17 108 V XL C A 72
235/65R17 104 H B C 71
18 inch
235/60R18 103 V C A 71
235/60R18 103 H C B 69
235/60R18 107 V XL C B 70
235/60R18 103 V C A 71
235/60R18 103 H C C 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Nexen N Fera RU1 >>

Questions and Answers for the Nexen N Fera RU1

Ask a question
September 21, 2016

My existing tyres are nexen blue eco 215 / 65 R16 98H Advisory note on yesterdays MOT states front offside tyre will need to be replaced shortly. I never replace just one tyre on the same axle. I now require two tyres for front axle. what would be your advice be regarding fitting two new nexen N Fera ru1 tyres on the front axle and leave the two exsting rear tyres on the back

It's always recommended to fit the tyres with the most grip at the back, so in this case we'd suggest swapping the front and rear wheels around, then fitting the new tyres to the rear.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 22 user reviews

Most drivers find the Nexen N Fera RU1 to be a strong value UHP/touring-leaning tyre with very good dry and wet grip for the price, comfortable ride, low noise, and notably good wear for many users. High-scoring reviews frequently praise braking confidence, stability, and long mileage, with several reporting 40,000-65,000+ km. A minority report issues: poor handling/grip on specific vehicles, vibration/sidewall flex in certain sizes, faster wear for some, and noise at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is positive, with negatives appearing concentrated in specific fitments and conditions.

Strengths
  • Value for money
  • Comfort/low noise
  • Good dry grip
  • Good wet performance
  • Strong braking
  • Good tread wear/longevity
Areas for Improvement
  • Handling/grip issues on certain vehicles
  • Vibration/sidewall flex reports
  • Higher-speed noise for some
  • Faster wear for some users

Top 3 Nexen N Fera RU1 Reviews

Given 86% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan Sport 2.0 TDI 140hp (235/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 40,000 spirited miles
I'm really surprised at the great value of these tyres. Super impressed that I got at least 65000kms (40000 miles) (On a VW Tiguan 2.0 TDI 4Motion). Unfortunately I was forced to change two tyres because of damage on a bad road. I would have easily got 75000+ out of it. And considering the way I drive, that's saying something!
Ask a question | Helpful 798
April 2, 2025
Given 81% while driving a Honda Vezel 1.5 Hybrid RU3 (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 700 average miles
Road trip for almost 700km .. now on the way back for another 400km .. handling is good in both wet and dry but a bit noisy. During emergency braking is marvelous. Highly recommended for Touring cars. I'm using these tyres on my Honda Vezel Hybrid.
December 4, 2023
Given 53% while driving a Kia Motors EV6 GT (255/55 R20) on mostly motorways for 15,000 average miles
Something wrong with handling. The road shoul be ideal for these tyres.
October 1, 2025
Have you driven on the Nexen N Fera RU1 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Nexen N Fera RU1? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Nexen N Fera RU1 >

Latest Nexen N Fera RU1 Reviews

Given 47% while driving a Kia Motors EV6 GT (255/55 R20) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
Nightmare for Kia ev6 R20. Handling is awful.
November 11, 2025
Given 86% while driving a Hyundai elantra (195/65 R15) on mostly town for 50 easy going miles
Used it more than 50,000km. Trustworthy pair of tyres with good wear.
September 3, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 44% while driving a Volkswagen Tiuan R Line (235/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
Initially I received good road feedback and the tyre/road noise was bearable. The compound seems good, not too hard or soft, and much stronger than I expected since I have driven off road quite a few times with no issues. The problem I have with it now is the humming noise while driven +80km/h. Also, the steering feels much lighter and its like the tyre is disintegrating very rapidly after a year or so of use. Advantage was the price and i would definitely recommend if your car is not in use often but basically it costs half the price because it lasts half as long. The reviews online were mostly of initial use and is quite misleading.
November 12, 2021
Given 60% while driving a Kia Motors sorento (235/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
Didn't have much problems with the grip. TC would sometimes kick in when starting harder but they felt safe overall. Wear was disappointing, with one rotation they barely managed to do 20.000km. They still had some depth, but front end tires started to chip away at the end of the second season. They aren't bad tires in terms of grip, but they are still a bit to expensive for their wear. You can get premium tires for not much more and they can last for at least 30-35.000km.
March 10, 2020
Given 81% while driving a Kia Motors Sportage (235/55 R18 V) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
First impressions were markedly reduced low-frequency noise on the rough road. Very quiet at all-speed on the smooth road surfaces. Excellent braking performance, fantastic feel through the steering wheel and very comfortable ride at 37PSI VS UC6 I had before. Good enough in dry conditions and looking good in wet too. I can feel driving mileage improved slightly from 11.3L to 9.9L/ 100KM. Great value for money product.
November 7, 2019
Given 86% while driving a Volvo XC90 D5 185 HP (235/65 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 9,000 average miles
Put these on my Volvo xc90. Very affordable tyre, half the price of a premium tyre. Good dry grip and handling, good in the wet too. I don't corner like a maniac so on the limit traction is unknown. Noise is much the same as any other tyre in my opinion and wear rate is good for normal driving habits. All in all a robust good value acceptable performer and would easily recommend.
April 19, 2019
Given 93% while driving a Vauxhall Astra GTC (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
put four of these tyres on my Astra GTC that was running factory Bridgestones, which i hate. Bridgestones are like driving on solid stone, they are spine shattering. my local fitting centre was doing a deal on the Nexen tyre so i opted to try them and they are a revelation. they offer utter comfort, very low road noise and they have proved to have bags of grip in the wet and dry, even with spirited driving. they may well wear out quicker than other brands but for what i paid for them its manageable. overall i am very impressed with this tyre, it punches well above its weight
October 10, 2018
Given 84% while driving a Vauxhall Astra GTC (235/45 R19 W) on mostly motorways for 14,000 average miles
I bought these tyres due to the value for money they offered. I paid £75 a corner which was excellent value for such a large tyre. I find the Roadstone tyres a lot more comfortable than the Contisport 5”s that we're fitted by the manufacturer. I find the tyres excellent in the wet and dry and I have never driven beyond the limits of the tyre. The tyres have been on my car for 14,000 miles and the wear is excellent. I still have over 5mm on the front and 6mm on the rear. I would highly recommend these tyres to anyone wanting an affordable reliable tyre. I had Roadstone tyres on my previous vehicle and was that impressed I bought them for my current vehicle.
September 21, 2018
Given 70% while driving a Subaru Forester 2.0 XT (225/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Switched from factory fitted original Bridgestone Dueller 400H/L. Dry grip improved apparently. Wet grip improvement comes close but less predictable. Rubber compound on the softer side. Never aquaplan in rain season since new. Could be simply tread depth dependent though. I do a lot of hill drive winding down town to stay away from traffic during peak hours. These tyres are impressive in terms of road holding limit. Feedback is however, mediocre, your on road experience still desire if you want to floor the gas hard. Unlike some comments, the sidewall is stiff. Much stiffer than the original BS tyres. Quite not my cup of tea. Same factory recommended tyre pressure front and rear. Tread pattern is highway trend for mileage, instead of the stock BS that both mud/dirt terrain has been accounted for. Of course this Nexen goes quieter, on the contrary. But given that its cheap price tag, you really can't ask for more. A bargain find.
April 2, 2018
Given 73% while driving a Subaru XV Crosstrek (225/55 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Tyres are quiet, soft and comfort and i would like to think it is more towards Touring SUV type tyres compare to what it is marketed as performance type. Anyway value for money for it's price range.
August 24, 2017
Given 33% while driving a Volvo XC90 D5 (163bhp) (235/60 R18 V) on a combination of roads for 5,000 easy going miles
Wet or dry, the grip from these is terrible. I kept them on from November to May before I decided to swap them for the usual Pirelli tyre on my XC90 even though there was still 5-6 mm on them. I feel these were not suitable for those who want to survive an emergency stop.
They're quiet and the sidewalls are soft so the ride was great, they soaked up bumps very well. But they had to go.
May 25, 2017
Given 82% while driving a Subaru forester 2.5xt (225/50 R18 V) on a combination of roads for 100 average miles
Coming from Fallen Azenis Fk453CC 235/50R18, the Nexen N'Fera RU1 225/50R18 were lighter in weight and on the steering column. The ride is comfortable and quieter while fuel consumption seems to be better as expected switching from 235 to 225 width!

For the price, Nexen RU1s are definitely highly recommended tires!
April 12, 2017