2022/23 Best 9 All Terrain Tyres

Below are all the data points for the 2022/23 Best 9 All Terrain Tyres, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Firestone Destination AT2
Continental TerrainContact AT
Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus
Yokohama Geolandar AT G015
Travelstar Ecopath AT All Terrain
Toyo Open Country AT III
BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA
Nitto Terra Grappler G2

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental TerrainContact AT with a result of 41.6 M. The difference between best and worst was 10.7%.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 10%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental TerrainContact AT with a result of 58 M. The difference between best and worst was 21.7%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental TerrainContact AT with a result of 81.33 s. The difference between best and worst was 8.3%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental TerrainContact AT with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 30%.

Wet Circle (s)

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Firestone Destination AT2 with a result of 13.3 s. The difference between best and worst was 7.8%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Travelstar Ecopath AT All Terrain with a result of 86.5 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 6.2%.

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Travelstar Ecopath AT All Terrain with a result of 3.73 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 25.7%.

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA with a result of 39.08 M. The difference between best and worst was 24.2%.

Snow Traction (s)

Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA with a result of 4.57 s. The difference between best and worst was 34.1%.

Snow Handling (s)

Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA with a result of 97.4 s. The difference between best and worst was 12.4%.

Off road Performance Overview

Gravel Handling (s)

Gravel Handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA with a result of 61.6 s. The difference between best and worst was 3.8%.

Subj. Gravel Handling ( Points)

Subjective Gravel Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 15%.

Dirt Handling (s)

Dirt handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dirt handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dirt Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dirt Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 10%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 20%.

Subj. Noise ( Points)

Subjective in car noise levels (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 15%.

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental TerrainContact AT with a result of 71.9 dB. The difference between best and worst was 7.9%.

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Firestone Destination AT2 with a result of 8.42 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 13.8%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
1 Firestone Destination AT2 96.9%
2 Continental TerrainContact AT 96.7%
3 Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure 95.8%
4 Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus 94.7%
5 Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 94.6%
6 Travelstar Ecopath AT All Terrain 93.8%
7 Toyo Open Country AT III 93.7%
8 BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA 92.1%
9 Nitto Terra Grappler G2 88.4%

Test Winner

Firestone Destination AT2
Firestone Destination AT2

96.9%

comments powered by Disqus