Test Charts / ADAC
2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 215/55 R17
- Tyres tested
- 16
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 42.9 m | +0.80 m | 18 km/h | |
| 42.9 m | +0.80 m | 18 km/h | |
| 43.6 m | +1.50 m | 24 km/h | |
| 43.7 m | +1.60 m | 25 km/h | |
| 43.8 m | +1.70 m | 26 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +1.80 m | 26 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +2.00 m | 28 km/h | |
| 44.3 m | +2.20 m | 29 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +2.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +2.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 44.7 m | +2.60 m | 31 km/h | |
| 45 m | +2.90 m | 33 km/h | |
| 45.5 m | +3.40 m | 36 km/h | |
| 45.6 m | +3.50 m | 36 km/h | |
| 45.7 m | +3.60 m | 36 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (3.6 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 would still be travelling at 36 km/h when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 )
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34.2 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 34.6 m | +0.40 m | 14 km/h | |
| 34.6 m | +0.40 m | 14 km/h | |
| 34.7 m | +0.50 m | 16 km/h | |
| 35.1 m | +0.90 m | 21 km/h | |
| 35.4 m | +1.20 m | 24 km/h | |
| 35.6 m | +1.40 m | 26 km/h | |
| 35.9 m | +1.70 m | 28 km/h | |
| 36.5 m | +2.30 m | 33 km/h | |
| 36.7 m | +2.50 m | 34 km/h | |
| 37.1 m | +2.90 m | 36 km/h | |
| 37.3 m | +3.10 m | 37 km/h | |
| 38.3 m | +4.10 m | 43 km/h | |
| 41.1 m | +6.90 m | 53 km/h | |
| 41.1 m | +6.90 m | 53 km/h | |
| 41.3 m | +7.10 m | 54 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 20.8% (7.1 m ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Davanti Wintoura+ would still be travelling at 54 km/h when the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Braking - Concrete
Wet braking on Concrete in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37.6 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 37.7 m | +0.10 m | 7 km/h | |
| 38.2 m | +0.60 m | 16 km/h | |
| 38.5 m | +0.90 m | 20 km/h | |
| 39.3 m | +1.70 m | 27 km/h | |
| 39.4 m | +1.80 m | 28 km/h | |
| 39.8 m | +2.20 m | 31 km/h | |
| 40.2 m | +2.60 m | 33 km/h | |
| 40.5 m | +2.90 m | 35 km/h | |
| 40.8 m | +3.20 m | 36 km/h | |
| 41.3 m | +3.70 m | 39 km/h | |
| 41.4 m | +3.80 m | 39 km/h | |
| 42.7 m | +5.10 m | 45 km/h | |
| 43.7 m | +6.10 m | 49 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +6.90 m | 51 km/h | |
| 46.8 m | +9.20 m | 58 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 24.5% (9.2 m ≈ 2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Davanti Wintoura+ would still be travelling at 58 km/h when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 80.5 km/h | Best | |
| 78.7 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 78.6 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 77.4 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 77.3 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 76.7 km/h | -3.80 km/h | |
| 76.4 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 75.8 km/h | -4.70 km/h | |
| 75.6 km/h | -4.90 km/h | |
| 75.3 km/h | -5.20 km/h | |
| 74.7 km/h | -5.80 km/h | |
| 73.6 km/h | -6.90 km/h | |
| 71.6 km/h | -8.90 km/h | |
| 69.6 km/h | -10.90 km/h | |
| 68.4 km/h | -12.10 km/h | |
| 68.3 km/h | -12.20 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (12.2 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.4 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 3 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 3 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 2.9 m/sec2 | -0.50 m/sec2 | |
| 2.7 m/sec2 | -0.70 m/sec2 | |
| 2.4 m/sec2 | -1.00 m/sec2 | |
| 2.4 m/sec2 | -1.00 m/sec2 | |
| 2.2 m/sec2 | -1.20 m/sec2 | |
| 2.1 m/sec2 | -1.30 m/sec2 | |
| 1.9 m/sec2 | -1.50 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 44.1% (1.5 m/sec2).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 9.5 m | +0.20 m | 19 km/h | |
| 9.6 m | +0.30 m | 23 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.40 m | 26 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.40 m | 26 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.40 m | 26 km/h | |
| 9.8 m | +0.50 m | 29 km/h | |
| 9.9 m | +0.60 m | 32 km/h | |
| 9.9 m | +0.60 m | 32 km/h | |
| 10 m | +0.70 m | 34 km/h | |
| 10 m | +0.70 m | 34 km/h | |
| 10.1 m | +0.80 m | 37 km/h | |
| 10.1 m | +0.80 m | 37 km/h | |
| 10.1 m | +0.80 m | 37 km/h | |
| 10.3 m | +1.00 m | 41 km/h | |
| 11 m | +1.70 m | 51 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 18.3% (1.7 m ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Davanti Wintoura+ would still be travelling at 51 km/h when the Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 238 N | Best | |
| 234 N | -4.00 N | |
| 234 N | -4.00 N | |
| 234 N | -4.00 N | |
| 232 N | -6.00 N | |
| 231 N | -7.00 N | |
| 230 N | -8.00 N | |
| 230 N | -8.00 N | |
| 230 N | -8.00 N | |
| 226 N | -12.00 N | |
| 225 N | -13.00 N | |
| 222 N | -16.00 N | |
| 221 N | -17.00 N | |
| 218 N | -20.00 N | |
| 213 N | -25.00 N | |
| 202 N | -36.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (36 N).
Ice
1Ice Braking
Ice braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 16.1 m | Best | |
| 16.6 m | +0.50 m | |
| 16.8 m | +0.70 m | |
| 17 m | +0.90 m | |
| 17.1 m | +1.00 m | |
| 17.1 m | +1.00 m | |
| 17.2 m | +1.10 m | |
| 17.3 m | +1.20 m | |
| 17.6 m | +1.50 m | |
| 17.7 m | +1.60 m | |
| 17.8 m | +1.70 m | |
| 18 m | +1.90 m | |
| 18.5 m | +2.40 m | |
| 19.7 m | +3.60 m | |
| 20.2 m | +4.10 m | |
| 21.2 m | +5.10 m |
The difference between best and worst was 31.7% (5.1 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).
Value
2Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 65,100 KM | Best | |
| 57,500 KM | -7,600 KM | |
| 54,300 KM | -10,800 KM | |
| 54,000 KM | -11,100 KM | |
| 53,500 KM | -11,600 KM | |
| 49,300 KM | -15,800 KM | |
| 47,900 KM | -17,200 KM | |
| 47,300 KM | -17,800 KM | |
| 46,600 KM | -18,500 KM | |
| 46,100 KM | -19,000 KM | |
| 43,300 KM | -21,800 KM | |
| 41,500 KM | -23,600 KM | |
| 41,100 KM | -24,000 KM | |
| 38,100 KM | -27,000 KM | |
| 37,000 KM | -28,100 KM | |
| 35,700 KM | -29,400 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 45.2% (29,400 KM).
Abrasion
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 55 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 56 mg/km/t | +1.00 mg/km/t | |
| 57 mg/km/t | +2.00 mg/km/t | |
| 58 mg/km/t | +3.00 mg/km/t | |
| 59 mg/km/t | +4.00 mg/km/t | |
| 59 mg/km/t | +4.00 mg/km/t | |
| 64 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 64 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 69 mg/km/t | +14.00 mg/km/t | |
| 70 mg/km/t | +15.00 mg/km/t | |
| 71 mg/km/t | +16.00 mg/km/t | |
| 73 mg/km/t | +18.00 mg/km/t | |
| 79 mg/km/t | +24.00 mg/km/t | |
| 82 mg/km/t | +27.00 mg/km/t | |
| 83 mg/km/t | +28.00 mg/km/t | |
| 95 mg/km/t | +40.00 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 72.7% (40 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking - Concrete
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 30 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tyres tested
13 of these 16 tyres tested again
2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview
215/55 R1756 tyres tested
12 of these 16 tyres tested again
2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tyres tested
11 of these 16 tyres tested again

