P6 of 16
Beat 67% of the field
Sava intensa uhp Test Results
Tested 2010 to 2016
5 publications
Tested 7 times by independent publications, the Sava intensa uhp averages a finish of 10th.
- 7Independent tests
- 0Test wins
- 0Podium finishes
- 10thAverage finish
- 45%Field beaten on average
- 5Publications
7 tests, 2010 to 2016
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 45%
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Sava intensa uhp. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Fulda SportControl
5 shared: 1 ahead, 4 behind
|
5 | 1 | 4 | - | 20% |
 Vredestein Ultrac Cento
4 shared: 3 ahead, 1 behind
|
4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% |
 Toyo Proxes T1 Sport
4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind
|
4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% |
 Pirelli P Zero
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
|
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Continental Sport Contact 5
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
|
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Firestone Firehawk SZ90
3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Kumho Ecsta KU39
3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind
|
3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% |
 Dunlop SportMaxx RT
3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind
|
3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% |
 Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3
3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind
|
3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% |
 Uniroyal RainSport 2
3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind
|
3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% |
 Bridgestone Potenza S001
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Michelin Primacy 3
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Nokian Z G2
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tyre it replaced and the tyre that replaced it.
| Tyre | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sava intensa uhp This tyre | 7 | 0 | 10th | 45% |
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Successor | 16 | 0 | 13th | 52% |
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Sava intensa uhp (2 tests) and 15 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Wet grip weakness in 1 of 2 tests 2 praise, 5 criticise of 15 reviews · Read those reviews
- Tread life strength in 1 of 2 tests 5 praise, 1 criticise of 15 reviews · Read those reviews
Raised by owners, not by any test of this tyre
- Dry grip no test mentions it 8 praise, 2 criticise of 15 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ride comfort no test mentions it 6 praise, 1 criticise of 15 reviews · Read those reviews
- Value for money no test mentions it 7 praise, 0 criticise of 15 reviews · Read those reviews
Every test, newest first 7
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2016 1 test
2014 2 tests
P6 of 15
Beat 64% of the field
P10 of 50
Beat 82% of the field
2012 1 test
P19 of 50
Beat 59% of the field
2011 2 tests
P7 of 7
Beat 0% of the field
P10 of 14
Beat 31% of the field
2011 Auto Zeitung Max Performance Tyre Test
The new Sava is an alternative for bargain hunters
2010 1 test
P10 of 11
Beat 10% of the field
Back to the Sava intensa uhp overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Sava tyres