Sava intensa uhp
Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Sava intensa uhp
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Sava intensa uhp. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Top 3 Sava intensa uhp Reviews
Given
91%
while driving a
Dacia Logan
(215/45 R17) on
for 1,000
miles
Excellent GY kitchen summer tyre for a bargain. A bit higher fuel consumption, though.
Good on dry, not bad grip on wet, but nothing special.
Given
17%
while driving a
Skoda Octavia
(205/55 R16 W) on
a combination of roads
for 1,000
spirited miles
I can't believe what I've read above! These are easily the worst, most dangerous tyres I've ever had. They were mounted on the front (drive) wheels of my 140 bhp Octavia when I bought it second-hand, and I couldn't get rid of them fast enough. In the dry, they lost all traction when starting off, leaving the nose waving all over the place before they finally bit. Understeering was frightening in the dry, and I'll leave the wet to your imagination. It was horrifyingly unpleasant. Utter rubbish, not to be fitted to a wheelchair even.
Have you driven on the Sava intensa uhp tyre?
Have YOU got experience with the Sava intensa uhp? Help millions of other tyre buyers
Review your Sava intensa uhp >
Latest Sava intensa uhp Reviews
Given
57%
while driving a
Skoda Octavia
(225/40 R18 V) on
mostly country roads
for 50,000
spirited miles
Car slips when accelerating easily. Better situation on wet surface. They last long. Low comfort.
Given
93%
while driving a
Skoda Octavia estate
(225/45 R17) on
a combination of roads
for 25,000
easy going miles
I've just finished my third season (April - November) with these tyres. The tyres perform very well in the dry and I've had no issues with braking. In the wet they instill confidence, but when conditions are atrocious on the motorway, then I feel less comfortable with their grip. Having said that, I've never had a moment with them with the 25,000+ miles (40,000+ km) that I've driven with them and the braking distances are consistent with the wet driving conditions experienced. They are a little noisy (and this was expected) but it's not too bad, even with the music switched off. For me the biggest surprise is the wear. They are still showing 6mm after three season's driving. I'm astounded by that and know I'll probably get a few more seasons out of them before having to change them. When I do change them, I'm going for the Sava UHP 2 tyres, just because they seem to have slightly better reviews. For the money and the excellent wear ratio, I can highly recommend these tyres. Sava may be in the economy category of tyres, but I think they are far better than they are categorised. So much so, that I went for Sava Eskimo HP 2 winter tyres this year. Buy (and drive) with confidence.
Want the best tyre for real world driving? Watch this!
Good on dry, not bad grip on wet, but nothing special.
Given
91%
while driving a
Dacia Logan
(215/45 R17) on
for 1,000
miles
Excellent GY kitchen summer tyre for a bargain. A bit higher fuel consumption, though.
Given
89%
while driving a
Vauxhall
(225/45 R17) on
a combination of roads
for 9,000
average miles
These tyres for the price are the best available. Excellent in dry road ...and really good in wet. For my car with this power they are super... no problems at all.
They are made for high speed and i tested that.
Absolutely buy these tyres , i' ll definitely buy again.
Best Wishes.
My feelings are mixed about this tyre if comparing it with the top end (e.g. CSS5 and goodyear f1 as2) and my biggest disappointment from them is that half-way through their life they have started becoming noisy and perhaps started loosing grip a bit. In one year I have covered about 12k miles, they still have 5.5/6mm thread so plenty of life left in them so they are wearing well especially bearing in mind that they are on FWD car with 250bhp and 350nm. On the other hand I doubt there's better tyre for this money so all in all it is well balanced tyre with some compromises to be had. Dry grip I cannot complain at all, wet could of been better but no dangerous aquaplaning so it is perfectly capable. I will drive them down to around 3mm so I'm expecting about 10k miles more from them.
Bought these to replace continental sport contact - I was looking for a quiet tyre and the official tyre labelling implied these should meet the requirement. Initial impressions were very good, comfort and noise at motorway speeds was excellent. However they have now become almost unbearably noisy. Close inspection of the tread reveals some of the tread pattern only extends to half the depth of the main elements - this has now worn out and the nature of the tyre has changed completely even though the tyre is only half worn. Total mileage on this rubber has been 12000 miles compared to 20000 on the previous continentals. Other aspects of the tyres were all acceptable.
Given
93%
while driving a
Opel Astra G
(205/55 R16 V) on
a combination of roads
for 4,000
average miles
Good tyres. Very quiet and comfortable with slight weakness on wet roads...but for the price it's a bargain.
Given
93%
while driving a
Ford Focus
(205/55 R16 V) on
a combination of roads
for 3,200
spirited miles
I'll never again take a look on a Continental and Bridgestone after these tires. Better price, better comfort,better wear...dry grip at Bridgestone level. The only negative point is a little sluggish wet behaviour.