Firestone Firehawk SZ90
WatchThe Firestone Firehawk SZ90 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.
Expected Mileage
32,938
miles
Low Confidence
26
Reviews
68%
Average
279,790
miles driven
6
Tests (avg: 12th)
All Tests
View Test Results6
Tests
12th
Average
8th
Best
20th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test
8th/9
235/35 R19 • 2017
Good resistance to aquaplaning, low rolling resistance, cheap
Low lateral stability, strong understeer and long braking distances on wet surfaces, slow response to steering and unbalanced behavior on dry surfaces
Not recommended
2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test
9th/9
245/40 R18 • 2017
Acceptable resistance to aquaplaning
Unbalanced handling and long braking distances on wet and dry roads. High noise levels
Not recommended
2016 ADAC Tyre Test - 225/45 R17
12th/16
225/45 R17 • 2016
Low wear
Weak in the wet
Alternative Tyres
8.1/10
7.4/10
7.3/10
6.6/10
6.3/10
86% 4 reviews
Questions and Answers for the Firestone Firehawk SZ90
Ask a question
October 11, 2018
Hi Are Firestone SZ90 directional tyres
No, the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 is an asymmetric tyre.
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
| Size | Price Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 225/40 R18 | £94.99 - £94.99 (1 Price) | Compare Prices >> |
| 225/45 R17 | £97.99 - £97.99 (1 Price) | Compare Prices >> |
| Available in 2 tyre sizes - View all. | ||
Top 3 Firestone Firehawk SZ90 Reviews
Given 54%
while driving a
Audi 2.0tdi 177 sline sportback
(245/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 15 miles
Bought the tyres just over a year ago. Noticed from the get go on wet roads the water displacement was very good. Quite noisy but you can get over that.
Around 25,000km later, the outside of the tyres are below the legal limit whilst the inside have 3mm left (must be a recurring thing as an alignment was done on them when they were put on and other drivers have experienced this). This can also be seen in the back two tyres but not as prominent. There’s probably another 15,000km-20,000km ish to get out of them.
Grand set of tyres. Probably wouldn’t buy again. The next set going on the front are a pair of Goodyear eagle f1 asymmetric 6’s.
Around 25,000km later, the outside of the tyres are below the legal limit whilst the inside have 3mm left (must be a recurring thing as an alignment was done on them when they were put on and other drivers have experienced this). This can also be seen in the back two tyres but not as prominent. There’s probably another 15,000km-20,000km ish to get out of them.
Grand set of tyres. Probably wouldn’t buy again. The next set going on the front are a pair of Goodyear eagle f1 asymmetric 6’s.
Given 46%
while driving a
Audi A4 2.0 TDI 140 SLine
(245/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 16,250 spirited miles
These tyres were solely on the rear of the car.
Wore out on the shoulder of the near side tyre after approx. 26,000 km. The rest of the tyre is about 2.5 mm, and about 3 mm left on the offside tyre shoulder.
As they were only on the rear I can’t comment on steering feel, however, the rear was liable to stepping out on very wet roads. Not something I’d expect from a front wheel drive daily. Above 90 km/h the risk of aqauplaning the rear was high.
Comfort wasn’t the worst, they handled bumps relatively well. Noise was above average but not unbearable for long motorway journeys.
Wore out on the shoulder of the near side tyre after approx. 26,000 km. The rest of the tyre is about 2.5 mm, and about 3 mm left on the offside tyre shoulder.
As they were only on the rear I can’t comment on steering feel, however, the rear was liable to stepping out on very wet roads. Not something I’d expect from a front wheel drive daily. Above 90 km/h the risk of aqauplaning the rear was high.
Comfort wasn’t the worst, they handled bumps relatively well. Noise was above average but not unbearable for long motorway journeys.
Given 53%
while driving a
Opel Corsa D 1.4
(195/50 R15)
on a combination of roads
for 15 average miles
I don't even care how this tyres are on dry or wet road because you can't hear anything inside car except noise of tyres, this noise make you mad, no chance to handle it, never again firestone
Have you driven on the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 tyre?
Have YOU got experience with the Firestone Firehawk SZ90? Help millions of other tyre buyers
Latest Firestone Firehawk SZ90 Reviews
Given 74%
while driving a
Volkswagen golf 2.0 gt tdi
(225/45 R17 W)
on mostly town
for 18,000 easy going miles
Decent tyres for the price. Wet grip good, dry grip good only negative is that they have started to crack at 3mm and 18000 miles.
Given 92%
while driving a
SEAT 1.4 TSI
(195/55 R15)
on mostly country roads
for 80,000 average miles
Really great Tires. I had them on my new Seat. Lasted 80.000 km. They were used in all seasons. Great handling in every conditions. Hever had a problem with them. Great eaven on snow.
Very recommandable tire. I would buy it again for sure.
Very recommandable tire. I would buy it again for sure.
Given 80%
while driving a
Mercedes Benz C180
(225/45 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 17,500 average miles
Bought the tyres in May 2013, have done 28000 km with them. Two tyres down to wear sign, two still have about 3 mm. So I will change them in the spring with a new set of something else. They had very good grip on dry and wet, on curves the car was very stable, feedback also good, you felt the car when it started to slide. Negative aspects: noise, low comfort and high fuel consumption.
Given 86%
while driving a
Audi A3 2.0 TDI 140
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 10,000 average miles
I'm really impressed by these tyres. Had a quick look at the reviews here before buying and there were several negative ones, which almost turn my decision on buying them. But actually the tyres are great in dry, wet, wet & cold handling and braking... They grip in turns with high speed and road feedback is good.
I can say they are a bit noisy, but it's not something bothering. Wear is less than 1mm after 15000km. Will buy again and recommend for sure!
I can say they are a bit noisy, but it's not something bothering. Wear is less than 1mm after 15000km. Will buy again and recommend for sure!
Given 69%
while driving a
Rover 75
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 100 spirited miles
I have recently bought a set of these tyres for my car having been informed that they had a new tread pattern. I have found that they have good cornering and braking characteristics in wet or dry conditions on all road surfaces.
I recently took a friend who races street cars as a hobby for a drive on dual carriageways and motorway and he even remarked how quiet they were regarding road noise over other comparable makes.
I would definitely recommend these tyres to anyone.
I recently took a friend who races street cars as a hobby for a drive on dual carriageways and motorway and he even remarked how quiet they were regarding road noise over other comparable makes.
I would definitely recommend these tyres to anyone.
Given 20%
while driving a
Mitsubishi Lancer GLXi
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 27,000 spirited miles
These tyres are hard, noisy and slippery compared with Pirelli Cinturato P1 and Fulda carat Progresso. Car is unstable on korners, not good handling on dry & wet surfaces and not safe feeling when driving faster on corners at all.
I recommend from my experience Fulda and Pirelli summer and winter tyres.
These tyres are not sport tyres at all, I wouldn't buy again and don't recommend them to anyone.
I recommend from my experience Fulda and Pirelli summer and winter tyres.
These tyres are not sport tyres at all, I wouldn't buy again and don't recommend them to anyone.
Given 43%
while driving a
Audi A3 2.0T Sporkback
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 4,000 spirited miles
Very noisy after 90mph and feeling insecure eve tho I have sport suspension. Wouldnt buy again.
Given 61%
while driving a
SEAT Exeo
(225/40 R18 W)
on mostly town
for 13,000 spirited miles
I replaced my Goodyear Eagle F1s, which I'd had on since the car was new, with the Firestone Firehawk SZ90u to try and save a few quid. But as soon as I drove away from the garage I could tell the difference. The car seemed more bouncier as I steered (not in a good way) and felt unstable. It felt like the car was swaying. I beared with it to see if it was just psychological but when I took some corners at what I deemed to be my usual way, the traction control would come on and the car didn't handle anything like it did with the Goodyears. I had never really noticed much difference in handling over the years when I've changed my tyres but maybe as I'm driving a faster, sportier car that I enjoy driving well maybe this is the difference. I was that concerned I took my car back to the garage to ask them if they could check that nothing had been disturbed or fiddled with when changing the tyres! A technician came out with me and drove the car but he couldn't notice anything wrong with the way it handled. I can only put it down to the difference in tyres and when they showed me the difference in the side wall firmness between the Goodyear and the Firestone, the Goodyear are reinforced and solid, preventing rolling and improving stability. The Firestones have now worn on the outside circumference (fronts only) after approx. 13,000 miles, requiring replacement. The rest of the tyre and the rears have plenty of tread left on them but I am putting Goodyear Eagle F1s back on the fronts for now and the rears when they're also worn. Hopefully I will get the trusty road holding and handling I was accustomed to again..
Opel Corsa 1.2 80Hp
(195/50 R15)
on a combination of roads
for 13,000 easy going miles
My worse tyres, very noisy- this noise make you crazy, after 15000 km I've decided bined them as couldn't use them any more, wear quite quick so in this tyres is huge advantage, positive is good grip on wet and dry, fuel consumption was increased too. After this tyres I won't buy any Firestone again
Given 73%
while driving a
BMW 316d
(225/50 R17)
on mostly motorways
for 5,000 average miles
Run flat version. Very harsh. Good wear rate and dry grip but found slippery in the wet and despite many attempts at balancing struggled to get them them to settle, they just seemed skittish and unpredictable Replaced early.
Given 86%
while driving a
Mercedes Benz C180
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 12,000 average miles
I gave grades to these tyres after first impressions and now, after 20000 km, I'm back with new verdicts. Grip on dry and wet almost perfect, braking the same. Lateral side very strong, car doesn't bend on corners. Wear is somewhere at half. Negative aspects: noise, consumption and comfort.
Given 90%
while driving a
Ford Mustang GT
(245/45 R17 W)
on mostly country roads
for 500 spirited miles
My second set of these tyres as I was so impressed with them on my daily car, and they're just as capable on a much more powerful car.
Highly recommended, much better grip, comfort, stability and quieter than the tyres they replaced.
Highly recommended, much better grip, comfort, stability and quieter than the tyres they replaced.
