Nissan Versa Tyres

On this page you will find the best real world tyre reviews from owners of the Nissan Versa.

Do you Drive a Nissan Versa? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre! After all, who knows what the best tyre for a Versa better than the owners?

Tyre Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver Plus (61) 84% 72% 78% 77% 91% 83%
Yokohama S Drive (65) 83% 69% 75% 77% 71% 68%
Continental ProContact (11) 73% 69% 65% 67% 62% 60%
Bridgestone B250 (48) 66% 55% 61% 62% 70% 64%

Nissan Versa Tyre Review Highlights

Writing about the Continental ProContact given 21% (185-65-15-T)
Driving on a combination of roads for 500 easy going miles
ProContactE are noisy tyre from Continental that constantly rumble into the ears of every occupant of the small Versa saloon car. It's not useful feedback, just annoying noise that's always present to interfere with conversation, or spoil the music you want to hear from the stereo. Tyre noise always present while the car is moving, louder on some road surfaces than others.

Through the steering wheel, these tyres feel sort of soggy as well, even on dry tarmac or concrete, whether cruising in a straight lane or sweeping around curves; in fairness they never actually slid off the road, they just felt soft and not precise at all. Yes, they were at the correct pressures recommended by Nissan. On soaking wet roads they seemed more inclined to wander or aquaplane/hydroplane than other tyres on other cars in similar conditions unless speed was reduced. This particular rental car had about 15k miles, with the front Continentals about half worn in comparison to the rear pair, suggesting only 30k miles of useful life if rotated. In the 21st century, there are much better, quieter, grippier tyres to choose than these.
tyre reviewed on 2015-04-27 16:26:53
Writing about the Michelin Energy Saver Plus given 74% (195-60-15-H)
Driving on a combination of roads for 35000 average miles
I have Energy saver+ replaced my OEM BS B250 tire since 2013 Mar. It runs 50000 KM since then. Overall it's a better than average tire. After 40,000 km (25 K miles), it becomes more noisy and unpredictable in wet. Until 50,000 km the drain depth is about 3.5 mm, but overall grip lost 30% up. This is very natural in all tyres. It's up to driver to stay with this or replace it to your driving habit. I would say the first 40,000 km, this tyre worth every pence you spent. After 40,000 km, overall performance drops daily and better replace them.
tyre reviewed on 2014-10-03 05:12:02
Writing about the Yokohama S Drive given 76% (205-40-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 55000 spirited miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2013-10-05 10:50:30
Writing about the Bridgestone B250 given 34% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 25000 average miles
Cheap tyres without performance
tyre reviewed on 2011-10-24 20:48:24
Writing about the Bridgestone B250 given 33% (185-65-15-S)
Driving on mostly town for 3000 average miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2011-03-11 19:00:47
Writing about the Bridgestone B250 given 51% (185-65-15-S)
Driving on mostly town for 10000 average miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2010-07-15 21:54:12
Drive this car? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre