Following on from the 32 tyre braking shootout, Auto Bild have taken the fourteen best all season tyres to the full test, and included a summer and winter tyre as reference.
As with the Tyre Reviews all season test, Auto Bild have ranked the new Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 as the best all season tyre, not because it was outstanding in one single area, but because it had a rounded performance in nearly all tests.
Auto Bild also tested the new Vredestein Quatrac, which replaces the Quatrac 5. This new tyre performed excellently in the dry and wet tests, and had the best wear of the group, making the Vredestein Quatrac a very good tyre for climates like the UK.
Auto Bild also found the Continental AllSeasonContact to be a well rounded tyre, and the CrossClimate+ strong in the dry, but a little disappointing in the wet.
The updated Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO again struggled in the snow, which peanalised it more with the German score weighting than it did in the Tyre Reviews test.
Auto Bild performed drum wear testing and while their mileage predictions seem somewhat optimistic, it's worth scrolling down to the wear section to see the results as it wasn't something Tyre Reviews could test this year.
It's always nice when the data from two different tests, in difference sizes, performed in different conditions are similar, and this is what we have between the Auto Bild results, and our own.
Dry
As usual, the summer reference tyre had the advantage in dry braking, and the dry optimised Michelin CrossClimate+ was a close second.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
39 m | -0.70 m |
| 39.7 m | Best | |
| 39.8 m | +0.10 m | |
| 40.6 m | +0.90 m | |
| 40.9 m | +1.20 m | |
| 40.9 m | +1.20 m | |
| 41.1 m | +1.40 m | |
| 41.2 m | +1.50 m | |
| 41.6 m | +1.90 m | |
| 41.9 m | +2.20 m | |
| 42.7 m | +3.00 m | |
| 43 m | +3.30 m | |
| 43.1 m | +3.40 m | |
| 43.2 m | +3.50 m | |
RefReference Winter |
44.3 m | +4.60 m |
| 44.3 m | +4.60 m |
The difference between best and worst was 13.6% (5.3 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling retained the summer tyre's advantage, with the Bridgestone WeatherControl A005 EVO moving up to second place, ahead of the Vredestein and Michelin.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
90.9 km/h | +0.30 km/h |
| 90.6 km/h | Best | |
| 90.4 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
| 90.1 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 90.1 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 90 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 90 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 89.9 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 89.8 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 89.7 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 89.7 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 89 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 88.9 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 88.7 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 88.6 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
RefReference Winter |
88.5 km/h | -2.10 km/h |
All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
As in the Tyre Reviews test, a number of all season tyres beat the summer tyre in wet braking, with Bridgestone taking the lead.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 45 m | Best | |
| 46.3 m | +1.30 m | |
| 47 m | +2.00 m | |
RefReference Summer |
47.2 m | +2.20 m |
| 47.2 m | +2.20 m | |
| 48.6 m | +3.60 m | |
| 49.3 m | +4.30 m | |
| 49.3 m | +4.30 m | |
| 49.7 m | +4.70 m | |
| 50.3 m | +5.30 m | |
| 51 m | +6.00 m | |
| 51.1 m | +6.10 m | |
| 51.2 m | +6.20 m | |
| 51.3 m | +6.30 m | |
| 53.4 m | +8.40 m | |
RefReference Winter |
55.8 m | +10.80 m |
The difference between best and worst was 24% (10.8 m ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths).
Wet handling moved the new Quatrac to the top, ahead of the Hankook and Goodyear.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 79.5 km/h | Best | |
| 79.1 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 78.8 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
78.6 km/h | -0.90 km/h |
| 78.5 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 78.3 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 77.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 77.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 77.1 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 77 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 76.4 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 76.4 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 76.4 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 76.1 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
RefReference Winter |
75.7 km/h | -3.80 km/h |
| 75.5 km/h | -4.00 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5% (4 Km/H).
Straight aquaplaning had the summer leading by a small margin over the Vredestein and Hankook.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
81.9 km/h | +0.50 km/h |
| 81.4 km/h | Best | |
| 81.4 km/h | Best | |
| 80.7 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 80.2 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 78.4 km/h | -3.00 km/h | |
| 78.2 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 78 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 77.9 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
RefReference Winter |
76.7 km/h | -4.70 km/h |
| 76.2 km/h | -5.20 km/h | |
| 75.8 km/h | -5.60 km/h | |
| 75.3 km/h | -6.10 km/h | |
| 75.3 km/h | -6.10 km/h | |
| 75.1 km/h | -6.30 km/h | |
| 74.6 km/h | -6.80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (7.3 Km/H).
Snow
There was a 5.3 meter spread between the best and worst all season tyres, with the summer tyre stopping significantly behind the group.
Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 26.6 m | Best | |
RefReference Winter |
27 m | +0.40 m |
| 27.2 m | +0.60 m | |
| 27.6 m | +1.00 m | |
| 27.7 m | +1.10 m | |
| 27.9 m | +1.30 m | |
| 27.9 m | +1.30 m | |
| 28.5 m | +1.90 m | |
| 28.6 m | +2.00 m | |
| 28.9 m | +2.30 m | |
| 29.5 m | +2.90 m | |
| 29.9 m | +3.30 m | |
| 30.3 m | +3.70 m | |
| 30.9 m | +4.30 m | |
| 31.9 m | +5.30 m | |
RefReference Summer |
68.8 m | +42.20 m |
The difference between best and worst was 158.6% (42.2 m ≈ 9.4 Car Lengths).
Kleber and BFGoodrich performed well in snow braking and snow handling, with Bridgestone and Pirelli the worst of the all season tyres in both tests.
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 42.5 km/h | Best | |
| 42.3 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
RefReference Winter |
42.2 km/h | -0.30 km/h |
| 42 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 41.9 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 41.1 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 40.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 40.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 40.8 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 40.7 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 40.6 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 40.3 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 40.2 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 40.1 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 39.7 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
26.7 km/h | -15.80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 37.2% (15.8 Km/H).
Cost
The projected wear numbers seemed unusually high, with the new Vredestein reportedly being good for over 75,000kms!
While the numbers might be optimistic, we can focus on the overall order of the result to show us the new Vredestein and Goodyear beat the wear king Michelin, while the Bridgestone and Hankook struggle.
Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 75,090 KM | Best | |
| 72,680 KM | -2,410 KM | |
| 70,210 KM | -4,880 KM | |
| 67,820 KM | -7,270 KM | |
| 67,815 KM | -7,275 KM | |
| 64,890 KM | -10,200 KM | |
| 62,750 KM | -12,340 KM | |
| 60,175 KM | -14,915 KM | |
| 60,150 KM | -14,940 KM | |
| 57,235 KM | -17,855 KM | |
| 50,030 KM | -25,060 KM | |
| 48,575 KM | -26,515 KM | |
| 44,905 KM | -30,185 KM | |
| 43,000 KM | -32,090 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 42.7% (32,090 KM).
Calculating euros per 1000km gives us an overall cost for the tyres life, where the cheaper tyres can still be cost effective, even with lower projected wear.
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.99 Price/1000 | Best | €11.78 | |
| 4.05 Price/1000 | +0.06 Price/1000 | €9.29 | |
| 4.06 Price/1000 | +0.07 Price/1000 | €7.72 | |
| 4.27 Price/1000 | +0.28 Price/1000 | €5.91 | |
| 4.3 Price/1000 | +0.31 Price/1000 | €8.22 | |
| 4.73 Price/1000 | +0.74 Price/1000 | €9.59 | |
| 4.9 Price/1000 | +0.91 Price/1000 | €6.75 | |
| 5.1 Price/1000 | +1.11 Price/1000 | €10.70 | |
| 5.24 Price/1000 | +1.25 Price/1000 | €7.75 | |
| 5.34 Price/1000 | +1.35 Price/1000 | €7.29 | |
| 5.79 Price/1000 | +1.80 Price/1000 | €11.79 | |
| 5.85 Price/1000 | +1.86 Price/1000 | €9.88 | |
| 6.28 Price/1000 | +2.29 Price/1000 | €15.63 | |
| 6.59 Price/1000 | +2.60 Price/1000 | €8.03 |
The difference between best and worst was 65.2% (2.6 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3) works out €389 cheaper than the most expensive (Kumho Solus 4S HA32).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2020 test; financing costs are excluded.
Fuel use is another important factor for a tyre you will use year round, and in this test Bridgestone, Goodyear and Pirelli lead the way.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.73 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.93 kg/t | +0.20 kg/t | £11 | |
| 7.93 kg/t | +0.20 kg/t | £11 | |
| 8.01 kg/t | +0.28 kg/t | £16 | |
| 8.15 kg/t | +0.42 kg/t | £24 | |
| 8.5 kg/t | +0.77 kg/t | £44 | |
| 8.55 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t | £47 | |
| 8.55 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t | £47 | |
RefReference Summer |
8.59 kg/t | +0.86 kg/t | £49 |
RefReference Winter |
8.6 kg/t | +0.87 kg/t | £50 |
| 8.88 kg/t | +1.15 kg/t | £66 | |
| 8.96 kg/t | +1.23 kg/t | £70 | |
| 8.96 kg/t | +1.23 kg/t | £70 | |
| 9.03 kg/t | +1.30 kg/t | £74 | |
| 9.67 kg/t | +1.94 kg/t | £111 | |
| 9.99 kg/t | +2.26 kg/t | £129 |
The difference between best and worst was 29.2% (2.26 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 uses about 89 L (£129) more fuel than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
Noise
Unlike the Tyre Reviews test, Auto Bild tested external pass by noise, not internal noise.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.3 dB | Best | |
| 70.4 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 70.4 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 70.6 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 70.6 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 70.6 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 70.7 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 70.7 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 70.8 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.90 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
71.3 dB | +1.00 dB |
| 71.3 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +1.90 dB | |
RefReference Winter |
72.4 dB | +2.10 dB |
All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Results
Be sure to check out the Auto Bild website for the full data.
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 14 | 41.6 m | +1.90 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 14 | 90 km/h | -0.60 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 14 | 47 m | +2.00 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 14 | 78.8 km/h | -0.70 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 14 | 78.2 km/h | -3.20 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 7th / 14 | 28.5 m | +1.90 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 14 | 42 km/h | -0.50 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 14 | 70.7 dB | +0.40 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 2nd / 14 | 72680 KM | -2,410.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 4th / 14 | 4.27 Price/1000 | +0.28 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 14 | 7.93 kg/t | +0.20 kg/t |
- Price
- 310.00
Vredestein Quatrac
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 14 | 40.6 m | +0.90 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 14 | 90.4 km/h | -0.20 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 14 | 46.3 m | +1.30 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 14 | 79.5 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 14 | 81.4 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 8th / 14 | 28.6 m | +2.00 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 14 | 40.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 10th / 14 | 71.2 dB | +0.90 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 1st / 14 | 75090 KM | Best in this discipline |
| ValueLower is better | 6th / 14 | 4.73 Price/1000 | +0.74 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 9th / 14 | 8.88 kg/t | +1.15 kg/t |
- Price
- 355.00
Continental AllSeasonContact
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 11th / 14 | 43 m | +3.30 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 14 | 90 km/h | -0.60 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 14 | 48.6 m | +3.60 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 14 | 77.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 14 | 80.2 km/h | -1.20 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 14 | 27.9 m | +1.30 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 14 | 41.9 km/h | -0.60 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 12th / 14 | 71.4 dB | +1.10 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 6th / 14 | 64890 KM | -10,200.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 9th / 14 | 5.24 Price/1000 | +1.25 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 14 | 8.15 kg/t | +0.42 kg/t |
- Price
- 340.00
Michelin CrossClimate+
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 14 | 39.7 m | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 14 | 90.1 km/h | -0.50 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 14 | 49.7 m | +4.70 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 14 | 78.5 km/h | -1.00 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 11th / 14 | 75.3 km/h | -6.10 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 9th / 14 | 28.9 m | +2.30 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 14 | 40.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 14 | 70.6 dB | +0.30 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 3rd / 14 | 70210 KM | -4,880.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 10th / 14 | 5.34 Price/1000 | +1.35 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 14 | 8.01 kg/t | +0.28 kg/t |
- Price
- 375.00
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 10th / 14 | 42.7 m | +3.00 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 14 | 89.7 km/h | -0.90 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 13th / 14 | 51.3 m | +6.30 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 14 | 77 km/h | -2.50 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 14 | 78 km/h | -3.40 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 12th / 14 | 30.3 m | +3.70 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 14 | 40.8 km/h | -1.70 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 14th / 14 | 72.2 dB | +1.90 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 4th / 14 | 67820 KM | -7,270.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 2nd / 14 | 4.05 Price/1000 | +0.06 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 10th / 14 | 8.96 kg/t | +1.23 kg/t |
- Price
- 275.00
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 14 | 41.2 m | +1.50 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 14 | 89.9 km/h | -0.70 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 14 | 49.3 m | +4.30 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 14 | 77.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 14th / 14 | 74.6 km/h | -6.80 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 14 | 27.6 m | +1.00 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 14 | 40.7 km/h | -1.80 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 11th / 14 | 71.3 dB | +1.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 5th / 14 | 67815 KM | -7,275.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 3rd / 14 | 4.06 Price/1000 | +0.07 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 14 | 8.5 kg/t | +0.77 kg/t |
- Price
- 275.00
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 14 | 41.1 m | +1.40 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 14 | 90.1 km/h | -0.50 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 14 | 47.2 m | +2.20 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 14 | 79.1 km/h | -0.40 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 14 | 81.4 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 14 | 27.9 m | +1.30 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 14 | 41.1 km/h | -1.40 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 13th / 14 | 71.6 dB | +1.30 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 13th / 14 | 44905 KM | -30,185.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 11th / 14 | 5.79 Price/1000 | +1.80 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 12th / 14 | 9.03 kg/t | +1.30 kg/t |
- Price
- 260.00
Kleber Quadraxer 2
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 13th / 14 | 43.2 m | +3.50 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 14 | 88.9 km/h | -1.70 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 12th / 14 | 51.2 m | +6.20 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 14 | 76.4 km/h | -3.10 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 13th / 14 | 75.1 km/h | -6.30 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 14 | 27.2 m | +0.60 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 14 | 42.5 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 14 | 70.6 dB | +0.30 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 7th / 14 | 62750 KM | -12,340.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 5th / 14 | 4.3 Price/1000 | +0.31 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 14 | 8.55 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t |
- Price
- 270.00
BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 12th / 14 | 43.1 m | +3.40 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 14th / 14 | 88.6 km/h | -2.00 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 10th / 14 | 51 m | +6.00 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 14 | 76.1 km/h | -3.40 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 11th / 14 | 75.3 km/h | -6.10 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 1st / 14 | 26.6 m | Best in this discipline |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 14 | 42.3 km/h | -0.20 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 14 | 70.4 dB | +0.10 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 10th / 14 | 57235 KM | -17,855.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 12th / 14 | 5.85 Price/1000 | +1.86 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 14 | 8.55 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t |
- Price
- 335.00
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 14 | 40.9 m | +1.20 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 14 | 90.6 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 14 | 45 m | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 14 | 78.3 km/h | -1.20 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 10th / 14 | 75.8 km/h | -5.60 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 13th / 14 | 30.9 m | +4.30 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 14 | 40.1 km/h | -2.40 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 14 | 70.7 dB | +0.40 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 12th / 14 | 48575 KM | -26,515.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 14th / 14 | 6.59 Price/1000 | +2.60 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 14 | 7.73 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
- Price
- 320.00
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 9th / 14 | 41.9 m | +2.20 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 14 | 89 km/h | -1.60 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 9th / 14 | 50.3 m | +5.30 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 14 | 76.4 km/h | -3.10 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 5th / 14 | 78.4 km/h | -3.00 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 11th / 14 | 29.9 m | +3.30 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 14 | 40.2 km/h | -2.30 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 14 | 70.6 dB | +0.30 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 8th / 14 | 60175 KM | -14,915.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 1st / 14 | 3.99 Price/1000 | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 13th / 14 | 9.67 kg/t | +1.94 kg/t |
- Price
- 240.00
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 14 | 39.8 m | +0.10 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 14 | 88.7 km/h | -1.90 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 11th / 14 | 51.1 m | +6.10 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 14 | 76.4 km/h | -3.10 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 8th / 14 | 77.9 km/h | -3.50 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 14th / 14 | 31.9 m | +5.30 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 14th / 14 | 39.7 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 9th / 14 | 70.8 dB | +0.50 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 9th / 14 | 60150 KM | -14,940.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 7th / 14 | 4.9 Price/1000 | +0.91 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 14 | 7.93 kg/t | +0.20 kg/t |
- Price
- 295.00
Kumho Solus 4S HA32
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 14th / 14 | 44.3 m | +4.60 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 14 | 89.8 km/h | -0.80 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 14 | 49.3 m | +4.30 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 14 | 77.1 km/h | -2.40 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 9th / 14 | 76.2 km/h | -5.20 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 4th / 14 | 27.7 m | +1.10 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 14 | 40.6 km/h | -1.90 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 14 | 70.3 dB | Best in this discipline |
| WearHigher is better | 14th / 14 | 43000 KM | -32,090.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 13th / 14 | 6.28 Price/1000 | +2.29 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 14th / 14 | 9.99 kg/t | +2.26 kg/t |
- Price
- 270.00
Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (11)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 14 | 40.9 m | +1.20 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 14 | 89.7 km/h | -0.90 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 14th / 14 | 53.4 m | +8.40 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 14th / 14 | 75.5 km/h | -4.00 km/h |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 14 | 80.7 km/h | -0.70 km/h |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 10th / 14 | 29.5 m | +2.90 m |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 14 | 40.3 km/h | -2.20 km/h |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 14 | 70.4 dB | +0.10 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 11th / 14 | 50030 KM | -25,060.00 KM |
| ValueLower is better | 8th / 14 | 5.1 Price/1000 | +1.11 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 10th / 14 | 8.96 kg/t | +1.23 kg/t |
- Price
- 255.00

Hi. There is much of unlogic stuff. Kimbo Solus H32. 2020. Worst on test in wear, 2021.first on test in wear. Same tyre...
Tyre companies love putting out big updates into existing tyres and not changing the name. I'm not sure of the logic, but it could be that
Hi TyreReviews
Thanks for great and detailed review, however I am uncertain as to which exact tyres were tested. Example - following your review I would like to buy Goodyear Vector, but in the tested size (205/55/16) they come in a few different versions. Even if I stick to my load/fuel index (which is 91 V) Goodyear still has 3 versions of that tyre - one regular and two XLs. And the difference between them can be seen in noise levels, fuel consumption etc.
Two of them have C for fuel consumption (EU label) and one of them has A respectively.
So which variation of this tyre exactly is meant in the test?
There is quite a difference between A and C fuel indexes so which tyre was better in this respect than Continental AllSeason which is widely considered to have low rolling resistance. But here again, Continental comes in regular and XL variants with C and B fuel indexes - so which Continental do you mean?
I would gladly follow your advice and choose Goodyear but should I go for XL Goodyear tyres? My car allegedly does not need them (Toyota Corolla Verso 1.6 110HP R1 - 2004) but maybe I would benefit from using them? Only XL version has A class fuel consumption.
Could you please clarify this topic a bit and specify which tyre versions were used in these tests?
Thank you a lot.
Hi Alexandra, this wasn't my test, it was conducted by Auto Bild, they should have the full details on their German website. You can read the tyre reviews all season test here which has the load / speed / DOT noted in the results:
https://www.tyrereviews.com...
OK - but Auto Bild says that they had tested Goodyear V4season with 91V index and C petrol class, and that petrolwise it was almost the best (2nd place). They claim it was even better than Continental - the only tyre with B petrol class in the test. So how can Goodyear be better in this respect?? Are EU labels unreliable or was Auto Bild test faulty? I would really appreciate your opinion on that.
Different test conditions can change the order, it's not unusual to see magazines having different RR results from the official label scores, in fact it's quite common!
I am planning to purchase Nokian Seasonproof tyres for my Skoda Fabia estate for use in the UK. Any recent user comments, please?
Traditionally the Nokian all season tyres are the most winter bias, so unless you're in the very North of the UK I would suggest something a bit more suited to our climate
Thanks; I am in the Midlands of England with little snow most winters.
Hey, is this the Vredestein Quatrac 5 or the Pro version?
Neither, it's the new Quatrac
Can you please post a link of it? I cannot find it and here the thread is not shown as well.
It's literally linked in the article https://www.tyrereviews.com...
Is it possible that premium class Bridgestone is worst then middle class Firestone? It's not make any sense cos firestone belongs to bridgestone.
I would be surprised if that was the case with same generation tyres
Thanks for quick reply :-). Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO should be better because is premium grade. Firestone is middle class. Why Bridgestone make better tire from Firestone Company?
It doesn't make sense to have two brands at the same level, so they split tier them
It is obvious, I don't understand why cheaper lower class tires (Firestone Multiseason 2) are better than premium tires (Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Evo)?
The score weighting in this test favours snow grip, which the firestone did well in and the Bridgestone did not. The Bridgestone was way better in the dry and wet.
In your opinion as an expert which tire is better? I have a toyota avensis T27 1.8 valvematic. Mainly city driving. Which one would you choose?
This test highlights the differences. One is better in dry and wet and the other in snow, so it depends what you want
Should I be influenced by the fact that one is premium class and the other is middle class, is it a negligible argument
Negligible, not technical argument.
https://www.tirerack.com/ti...
I just found CC² on U.S. web. Looks they improve behavior on snow, but I expected more different pattern. Michelin wants sell out stores in Europe with old specs. probably, or myabe delay duo to EU ecoterorism.
The US version of the CC2 is a slightly different spec to the European version, I'll have more details in Feb :)
And, do you have more info now, about the European Michelin CrossClimate 2 version?
Sadly the planned test has been delayed, but I do know the main improvements of the CC2 are wet and snow performance. It was always dominating in the dry so it should be a really impressive tyre
Any further info on the CC2 / it's launch in Europe?
Sept 2nd :)
Mr Benson, you’ve outdone yourself yet again. Thank you.
One big suprise in this test, Vredestein made directional pattern....finally :-D
Here is another winter+AS tire test in 205/55/16. Even it's in Slovak language, graph and table are easily understandable. My front Hankooks quit burn out in Slovakian test.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
The Quatrac 5 was direction, which this replaces :)
I've seen the video, interesting test, though I feel it's a shame there isn't two seperate videos forAS and winter.
It's probably due to, they had GY Utra Grip 9+ as a referential tire, and all winter and AS tires were compered to GY UG 9+.
This new Vredestein look like my next AS tires, because Bridgestone, even on EVO version, did'n improve snow performance and aquaplaning to my acceptable values.