Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/60 R16
Tyres tested
16
Disciplines
12

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
41.4 m Best 0 km/h
42.9 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
42.9 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
43 m +1.60 m 25 km/h
43.2 m +1.80 m 27 km/h
43.7 m +2.30 m 30 km/h
44.2 m +2.80 m 33 km/h
44.3 m +2.90 m 33 km/h
44.4 m +3.00 m 34 km/h
44.5 m +3.10 m 34 km/h
44.6 m +3.20 m 35 km/h
44.8 m +3.40 m 36 km/h
44.9 m +3.50 m 36 km/h
44.9 m +3.50 m 36 km/h
45 m +3.60 m 37 km/h
45.6 m +4.20 m 39 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 10.1% (4.2 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Uniroyal WinterExpert would still be travelling at 39 km/h when the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
35.2 m Best 0 km/h
35.9 m +0.70 m 18 km/h
36.4 m +1.20 m 24 km/h
36.9 m +1.70 m 28 km/h
36.9 m +1.70 m 28 km/h
37.2 m +2.00 m 30 km/h
38.2 m +3.00 m 36 km/h
38.5 m +3.30 m 38 km/h
38.5 m +3.30 m 38 km/h
38.7 m +3.50 m 39 km/h
39.1 m +3.90 m 41 km/h
39.1 m +3.90 m 41 km/h
39.5 m +4.30 m 43 km/h
40 m +4.80 m 45 km/h
41.2 m +6.00 m 50 km/h
45.6 m +10.40 m 62 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 29.5% (10.4 m ≈ 2.3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Austone SP 901 would still be travelling at 62 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Braking - Concrete

Wet braking on Concrete in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking - Concrete
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
36.4 m Best 0 km/h
38.3 m +1.90 m 29 km/h
38.6 m +2.20 m 31 km/h
38.7 m +2.30 m 32 km/h
38.9 m +2.50 m 33 km/h
39.4 m +3.00 m 36 km/h
39.4 m +3.00 m 36 km/h
39.8 m +3.40 m 38 km/h
40.2 m +3.80 m 40 km/h
40.3 m +3.90 m 40 km/h
40.5 m +4.10 m 41 km/h
41 m +4.60 m 44 km/h
41.9 m +5.50 m 47 km/h
42.1 m +5.70 m 48 km/h
42.5 m +6.10 m 49 km/h
45.1 m +8.70 m 57 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 23.9% (8.7 m ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Austone SP 901 would still be travelling at 57 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
90.6 km/h Best
88.8 km/h -1.80 km/h
87.3 km/h -3.30 km/h
86.4 km/h -4.20 km/h
86.2 km/h -4.40 km/h
85.5 km/h -5.10 km/h
85.4 km/h -5.20 km/h
85 km/h -5.60 km/h
84.5 km/h -6.10 km/h
84.4 km/h -6.20 km/h
83.2 km/h -7.40 km/h
82.6 km/h -8.00 km/h
82.3 km/h -8.30 km/h
81.5 km/h -9.10 km/h
80.1 km/h -10.50 km/h
69.1 km/h -21.50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 23.7% (21.5 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.9 m/sec2 Best
3.8 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
3.8 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
3.8 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
3.8 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
3.6 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3.6 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3.5 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
3.5 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
3.4 m/sec2 -0.50 m/sec2
3.4 m/sec2 -0.50 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
3.2 m/sec2 -0.70 m/sec2
2.1 m/sec2 -1.80 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 46.2% (1.8 m/sec2).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
9.5 m Best 0 km/h
9.5 m Best 0 km/h
9.5 m Best 0 km/h
9.5 m Best 0 km/h
9.6 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.6 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.6 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.6 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.7 m +0.20 m 19 km/h
9.9 m +0.40 m 26 km/h
9.9 m +0.40 m 26 km/h
10 m +0.50 m 29 km/h
10.2 m +0.70 m 34 km/h
10.5 m +1.00 m 40 km/h
11.3 m +1.80 m 52 km/h
11.4 m +1.90 m 53 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 20% (1.9 m ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 would still be travelling at 53 km/h when the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
265.3 N Best
261.4 N -3.90 N
260.9 N -4.40 N
260.1 N -5.20 N
260.1 N -5.20 N
258.1 N -7.20 N
257.3 N -8.00 N
257 N -8.30 N
251.1 N -14.20 N
248.6 N -16.70 N
248.6 N -16.70 N
245.7 N -19.60 N
245.7 N -19.60 N
236.7 N -28.60 N
228 N -37.30 N
223.6 N -41.70 N

The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (41.7 N).

Ice

1

Ice Braking

Ice braking in meters (20 - 0 )

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
18.6 m Best 0 km/h
19.1 m +0.50 m 21 km/h
19.5 m +0.90 m 28 km/h
19.6 m +1.00 m 29 km/h
19.7 m +1.10 m 31 km/h
20 m +1.40 m 34 km/h
20.3 m +1.70 m 38 km/h
20.3 m +1.70 m 38 km/h
20.4 m +1.80 m 39 km/h
20.8 m +2.20 m 42 km/h
21 m +2.40 m 44 km/h
21 m +2.40 m 44 km/h
21 m +2.40 m 44 km/h
21.2 m +2.60 m 46 km/h
21.4 m +2.80 m 47 km/h
21.8 m +3.20 m 50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 17.2% (3.2 m ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 50 km/h when the Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.4 dB Best
70.6 dB +0.20 dB
70.8 dB +0.40 dB
70.9 dB +0.50 dB
71.1 dB +0.70 dB
71.1 dB +0.70 dB
71.2 dB +0.80 dB
71.3 dB +0.90 dB
71.3 dB +0.90 dB
71.4 dB +1.00 dB
71.8 dB +1.40 dB
71.8 dB +1.40 dB
72.1 dB +1.70 dB
72.4 dB +2.00 dB
72.8 dB +2.40 dB
74.1 dB +3.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (3.7 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
56,300 KM Best
53,300 KM -3,000 KM
47,700 KM -8,600 KM
46,900 KM -9,400 KM
44,700 KM -11,600 KM
43,900 KM -12,400 KM
42,100 KM -14,200 KM
42,100 KM -14,200 KM
41,700 KM -14,600 KM
41,700 KM -14,600 KM
41,700 KM -14,600 KM
40,000 KM -16,300 KM
38,700 KM -17,600 KM
37,000 KM -19,300 KM
35,700 KM -20,600 KM
34,800 KM -21,500 KM

The difference between best and worst was 38.2% (21,500 KM).

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.5 l/100km Best £0
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (0.3 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Austone SP 901 uses about 57 L (£83) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TyreResultGap to best
51 mg/km/t Best
56 mg/km/t +5.00 mg/km/t
56 mg/km/t +5.00 mg/km/t
62 mg/km/t +11.00 mg/km/t
65 mg/km/t +14.00 mg/km/t
67 mg/km/t +16.00 mg/km/t
69 mg/km/t +18.00 mg/km/t
70 mg/km/t +19.00 mg/km/t
71 mg/km/t +20.00 mg/km/t
71 mg/km/t +20.00 mg/km/t
74 mg/km/t +23.00 mg/km/t
76 mg/km/t +25.00 mg/km/t
78 mg/km/t +27.00 mg/km/t
83 mg/km/t +32.00 mg/km/t
89 mg/km/t +38.00 mg/km/t
90 mg/km/t +39.00 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 76.5% (39 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking - Concrete
80 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
30 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.