Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/50 R17
Tyres tested
16
Disciplines
8
Test vehicle
Audi A4

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
33.9 m Best 0 km/h
34.2 m +0.30 m 12 km/h
34.4 m +0.50 m 16 km/h
34.5 m +0.60 m 17 km/h
34.9 m +1.00 m 22 km/h
35 m +1.10 m 23 km/h
35.2 m +1.30 m 25 km/h
35.3 m +1.40 m 26 km/h
35.7 m +1.80 m 29 km/h
35.8 m +1.90 m 30 km/h
36.2 m +2.30 m 33 km/h
36.3 m +2.40 m 33 km/h
36.3 m +2.40 m 33 km/h
36.4 m +2.50 m 34 km/h
36.5 m +2.60 m 35 km/h
36.7 m +2.80 m 36 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.3% (2.8 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 would still be travelling at 36 km/h when the Falken ZIEX ZE320 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
30.1 m Best 0 km/h
30.1 m Best 0 km/h
31.1 m +1.00 m 23 km/h
31.3 m +1.20 m 25 km/h
31.8 m +1.70 m 30 km/h
32.7 m +2.60 m 37 km/h
32.9 m +2.80 m 38 km/h
33 m +2.90 m 39 km/h
33.4 m +3.30 m 41 km/h
33.8 m +3.70 m 43 km/h
33.9 m +3.80 m 44 km/h
34.3 m +4.20 m 45 km/h
34.5 m +4.40 m 46 km/h
34.5 m +4.40 m 46 km/h
34.9 m +4.80 m 48 km/h
37.9 m +7.80 m 59 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 25.9% (7.8 m ≈ 1.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Greentrac Quest X would still be travelling at 59 km/h when the Linglong Sport Master had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Braking - Concrete

Wet braking on Concrete in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking - Concrete
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
32.3 m Best 0 km/h
34.9 m +2.60 m 35 km/h
35.9 m +3.60 m 41 km/h
37.3 m +5.00 m 48 km/h
37.7 m +5.40 m 49 km/h
38.1 m +5.80 m 51 km/h
38.1 m +5.80 m 51 km/h
38.8 m +6.50 m 53 km/h
39.2 m +6.90 m 55 km/h
39.5 m +7.20 m 56 km/h
40.1 m +7.80 m 57 km/h
40.2 m +7.90 m 58 km/h
40.8 m +8.50 m 59 km/h
41.5 m +9.20 m 61 km/h
42.1 m +9.80 m 63 km/h
44.5 m +12.20 m 68 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 37.8% (12.2 m ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Greentrac Quest X would still be travelling at 68 km/h when the Linglong Sport Master had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
79.7 km/h Best
79.7 km/h Best
79.3 km/h -0.40 km/h
78.6 km/h -1.10 km/h
77.3 km/h -2.40 km/h
77.2 km/h -2.50 km/h
77.2 km/h -2.50 km/h
76.6 km/h -3.10 km/h
76.5 km/h -3.20 km/h
76.2 km/h -3.50 km/h
75.7 km/h -4.00 km/h
75.7 km/h -4.00 km/h
75.2 km/h -4.50 km/h
75 km/h -4.70 km/h
73.7 km/h -6.00 km/h
72.9 km/h -6.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.5% (6.8 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.7 m/sec2 Best
3.7 m/sec2 Best
3.6 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
3.6 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
3.5 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.5 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.4 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3.4 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3.4 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3.4 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
3.2 m/sec2 -0.50 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
3 m/sec2 -0.70 m/sec2
2.9 m/sec2 -0.80 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 21.6% (0.8 m/sec2).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
57,800 KM Best
56,000 KM -1,800 KM
55,600 KM -2,200 KM
48,600 KM -9,200 KM
46,700 KM -11,100 KM
44,700 KM -13,100 KM
44,700 KM -13,100 KM
43,200 KM -14,600 KM
38,200 KM -19,600 KM
37,500 KM -20,300 KM
37,200 KM -20,600 KM
36,700 KM -21,100 KM
36,100 KM -21,700 KM
30,600 KM -27,200 KM
27,700 KM -30,100 KM
26,100 KM -31,700 KM

The difference between best and worst was 54.8% (31,700 KM).

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.4 l/100km Best £0
5.4 l/100km Best £0
5.4 l/100km Best £0
5.5 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.5 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.5 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.6 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.6 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.6 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.6 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.6 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.7 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.7 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.8 l/100km +0.40 l/100km £110
6 l/100km +0.60 l/100km £165

The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (0.6 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master uses about 114 L (£165) more fuel than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TyreResultGap to best
54 mg/km/t Best
62 mg/km/t +8.00 mg/km/t
66 mg/km/t +12.00 mg/km/t
69 mg/km/t +15.00 mg/km/t
71 mg/km/t +17.00 mg/km/t
75 mg/km/t +21.00 mg/km/t
76 mg/km/t +22.00 mg/km/t
79 mg/km/t +25.00 mg/km/t
83 mg/km/t +29.00 mg/km/t
83 mg/km/t +29.00 mg/km/t
89 mg/km/t +35.00 mg/km/t
91 mg/km/t +37.00 mg/km/t
95 mg/km/t +41.00 mg/km/t
97 mg/km/t +43.00 mg/km/t
100 mg/km/t +46.00 mg/km/t
131 mg/km/t +77.00 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 142.6% (77 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking - Concrete
80 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.