Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Sportscars

2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
255/35 R19
Tyres tested
11
Disciplines
9

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
36.8 m -3.40 m
40.2 m Best
40.7 m +0.50 m
41.2 m +1.00 m
41.2 m +1.00 m
41.8 m +1.60 m
41.9 m +1.70 m
42.1 m +1.90 m
42.3 m +2.10 m
43 m +2.80 m
43.7 m +3.50 m
44 m +3.80 m

The difference between best and worst was 19.6% (7.2 m ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
124.5 km/h +2.60 km/h
121.9 km/h Best
120.7 km/h -1.20 km/h
120.5 km/h -1.40 km/h
120.2 km/h -1.70 km/h
119.7 km/h -2.20 km/h
119.6 km/h -2.30 km/h
119.5 km/h -2.40 km/h
119.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
119.3 km/h -2.60 km/h
118.8 km/h -3.10 km/h
118.5 km/h -3.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.8% (6 Km/H).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
45.7 m Best
RefReference Summer
46.9 m +1.20 m
47.1 m +1.40 m
47.6 m +1.90 m
48.1 m +2.40 m
49.6 m +3.90 m
50 m +4.30 m
50.4 m +4.70 m
51.8 m +6.10 m
53.4 m +7.70 m
53.8 m +8.10 m
54.8 m +9.10 m

The difference between best and worst was 19.9% (9.1 m ≈ 2 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
95.3 km/h Best
RefReference Summer
94.9 km/h -0.40 km/h
94.9 km/h -0.40 km/h
93.2 km/h -2.10 km/h
92.8 km/h -2.50 km/h
92.8 km/h -2.50 km/h
92 km/h -3.30 km/h
91.6 km/h -3.70 km/h
91.6 km/h -3.70 km/h
90.6 km/h -4.70 km/h
90.2 km/h -5.10 km/h
89.9 km/h -5.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (5.4 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
73.7 km/h Best
RefReference Summer
73.4 km/h -0.30 km/h
73.2 km/h -0.50 km/h
72.6 km/h -1.10 km/h
72.2 km/h -1.50 km/h
71.8 km/h -1.90 km/h
71.3 km/h -2.40 km/h
69.1 km/h -4.60 km/h
68.5 km/h -5.20 km/h
68.5 km/h -5.20 km/h
66.1 km/h -7.60 km/h
59.9 km/h -13.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 18.7% (13.8 Km/H).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
27.6 m Best
28 m +0.40 m
28 m +0.40 m
28.5 m +0.90 m
28.6 m +1.00 m
28.8 m +1.20 m
28.9 m +1.30 m
29.1 m +1.50 m
29.4 m +1.80 m
30.5 m +2.90 m
30.8 m +3.20 m
RefReference Summer
77.9 m +50.30 m

The difference between best and worst was 182.2% (50.3 m ≈ 11.2 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
49.4 km/h Best
49.1 km/h -0.30 km/h
49 km/h -0.40 km/h
48.9 km/h -0.50 km/h
48.7 km/h -0.70 km/h
48.7 km/h -0.70 km/h
48.4 km/h -1.00 km/h
47.6 km/h -1.80 km/h
47.4 km/h -2.00 km/h
46.5 km/h -2.90 km/h
45 km/h -4.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (4.4 Km/H).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.7 dB Best
71.1 dB +0.40 dB
72 dB +1.30 dB
72.2 dB +1.50 dB
72.5 dB +1.80 dB
RefReference Summer
72.6 dB +1.90 dB
73.5 dB +2.80 dB
73.7 dB +3.00 dB
74.1 dB +3.40 dB
74.9 dB +4.20 dB
75 dB +4.30 dB
75.7 dB +5.00 dB

The difference between best and worst was 7.1% (5 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
8.06 kg/t Best £0
8.5 kg/t +0.44 kg/t £24
8.5 kg/t +0.44 kg/t £24
8.66 kg/t +0.60 kg/t £33
RefReference Summer
8.8 kg/t +0.74 kg/t £40
9.02 kg/t +0.96 kg/t £53
9.25 kg/t +1.19 kg/t £65
9.35 kg/t +1.29 kg/t £71
9.39 kg/t +1.33 kg/t £73
9.99 kg/t +1.93 kg/t £106
10.32 kg/t +2.26 kg/t £124
10.35 kg/t +2.29 kg/t £125

The difference between best and worst was 28.4% (2.29 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Hankook Winter i cept evo2 uses about 86 L (£125) more fuel than the Continental WinterContact TS 860 S.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.