Sadly Tyre Reviews isn't performing an SUV summer tyre test this year, but luckily the German publication AutoBild once again have us covered if you want to know what the best tyre is for your SUV!
This year AutoBild tested twelve SUV tyres for the crossover SUV segment in the 225/65 R17 tyre size.
As usual, all the tyres were tested in the dry and wet, and had their rolling resistance and noise / comfort levels graded, but as this category of tyre is also intended for some "light off-roading" they tested the twelve SUV tyres in mud, sand, dirt and even on wet grass! This means this really is the best test this year you show you what the best tyre is for your SUV!
There's a LOT of data from this test, so we won't preface anymore - This is how the best twelve SUV tyres fared in the dry, wet, gravel, mud, dirt and sand!
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
Wet
Wet braking was led by the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The Michelin looks a little out of place in this test, the Pilot Sport 4 SUV is an ultra high performance summer tyre, and all the other tyres in the test are more touring / comfort bias tyres. Perhaps the Michelin Primacy 4 would have been a better match for the test, but this does give us an excellent insight into the differences between the two categories of tyres.
It should come as no surprise that the Aplus A919 in last place was the cheapest tyre on test, but it might be a surprise that the Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport also struggled to stop the car.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49.9 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 52.1 m | +2.20 m | 27 km/h | |
| 52.2 m | +2.30 m | 27 km/h | |
| 52.6 m | +2.70 m | 29 km/h | |
| 52.9 m | +3.00 m | 31 km/h | |
| 53 m | +3.10 m | 31 km/h | |
| 53.6 m | +3.70 m | 34 km/h | |
| 53.8 m | +3.90 m | 35 km/h | |
| 54.7 m | +4.80 m | 39 km/h | |
| 55 m | +5.10 m | 40 km/h | |
| 61.1 m | +11.20 m | 56 km/h | |
| 63.6 m | +13.70 m | 60 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 27.5% (13.7 m ≈ 3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Aplus A919 would still be travelling at 60 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The Michelin was also the fastest around the wet handling lap, beating the new Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 86.8 km/h | Best | |
| 86.4 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 85.7 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 85.5 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 85.4 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 85.2 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 85 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 84.8 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 84.4 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 84.3 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 84 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 82.5 km/h | -4.30 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5% (4.3 Km/H).
The Michelin also had the best straight aquaplaning resistance, significantly ahead of all the tyres bar the Uniroyal RainSport 5, which usually wins the deep water tests!
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 95.9 km/h | Best | |
| 94.5 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 91 km/h | -4.90 km/h | |
| 90.9 km/h | -5.00 km/h | |
| 90.2 km/h | -5.70 km/h | |
| 89 km/h | -6.90 km/h | |
| 87.8 km/h | -8.10 km/h | |
| 87.8 km/h | -8.10 km/h | |
| 87.1 km/h | -8.80 km/h | |
| 86.2 km/h | -9.70 km/h | |
| 83.9 km/h | -12.00 km/h | |
| 83.8 km/h | -12.10 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (12.1 Km/H).
Dry
The Pirelli Cinturato P7 managed to beat the Michelin to be best in dry braking, with the Aplus once again trailing the field buy a significant margin.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34.6 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 35.2 m | +0.60 m | 17 km/h | |
| 35.3 m | +0.70 m | 18 km/h | |
| 35.5 m | +0.90 m | 21 km/h | |
| 35.7 m | +1.10 m | 23 km/h | |
| 36.2 m | +1.60 m | 27 km/h | |
| 36.5 m | +1.90 m | 30 km/h | |
| 36.6 m | +2.00 m | 30 km/h | |
| 37.1 m | +2.50 m | 34 km/h | |
| 37.2 m | +2.60 m | 34 km/h | |
| 37.9 m | +3.30 m | 38 km/h | |
| 40.3 m | +5.70 m | 49 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 16.5% (5.7 m ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Aplus A919 would still be travelling at 49 km/h when the Pirelli CINTURATO P7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The more comfort bias Pirelli couldn't hold off the more sporty Michelin during the dry handling test.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 103.3 km/h | Best | |
| 102.7 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 102.4 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 102 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 101.7 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 100.5 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 100.5 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 100.4 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 99.9 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 98.4 km/h | -4.90 km/h | |
| 97.9 km/h | -5.40 km/h | |
| 97.4 km/h | -5.90 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (5.9 Km/H).
Off Road
The dirt handling course was led by Pirelli, with the new Hankook Ventus Prime 4 a close second!
Dirt Handling
Dirt handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 66.6 km/h | Best | |
| 66.5 km/h | -0.10 km/h | |
| 66.4 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
| 66.2 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 66.2 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 66.1 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 66 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 65.9 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 65.7 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 65.6 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 65.3 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 65.1 km/h | -1.50 km/h |
All the tyres in the Dirt Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
The next three data points are gravel, sand and mud traction tests, measured as a pulling force. It's important to note that offroad testing is some of the hardest testing in the world, none more so than mud, so worry less about the precise order and more about general trends.
These general trends are that the budget Aplus might not be able to grip on wet roads, but is great on wet grass and in mud but not sand. The General Grabber GT Plus was best in sand but poor on grass... it seems even general trends are difficult with offroad testing!
Grass Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2924 N | Best | |
| 2669 N | -255.00 N | |
| 2589 N | -335.00 N | |
| 2505 N | -419.00 N | |
| 2474 N | -450.00 N | |
| 2454 N | -470.00 N | |
| 2444 N | -480.00 N | |
| 2435 N | -489.00 N | |
| 2415 N | -509.00 N | |
| 2397 N | -527.00 N | |
| 2332 N | -592.00 N | |
| 2289 N | -635.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 21.7% (635 N).
Sand Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8886 N | Best | |
| 8422 N | -464.00 N | |
| 8398 N | -488.00 N | |
| 8346 N | -540.00 N | |
| 8304 N | -582.00 N | |
| 8102 N | -784.00 N | |
| 8102 N | -784.00 N | |
| 8012 N | -874.00 N | |
| 7998 N | -888.00 N | |
| 7744 N | -1,142.00 N | |
| 7407 N | -1,479.00 N | |
| 7230 N | -1,656.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 18.6% (1,656 N).
Mud Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3261 N | Best | |
| 3204 N | -57.00 N | |
| 3022 N | -239.00 N | |
| 2930 N | -331.00 N | |
| 2930 N | -331.00 N | |
| 2930 N | -331.00 N | |
| 2870 N | -391.00 N | |
| 2803 N | -458.00 N | |
| 2747 N | -514.00 N | |
| 2573 N | -688.00 N | |
| 2522 N | -739.00 N | |
| 2337 N | -924.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 28.3% (924 N).
Environment
External noise is a much easier test, and the Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV proved to be the quietest tyre of the group by a huge margin!
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 67.3 dB | Best | |
| 68.3 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 68.9 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 69.1 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 69.3 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 69.3 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 69.4 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 69.6 dB | +2.30 dB | |
| 70.1 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 70.1 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 70.2 dB | +2.90 dB | |
| 70.4 dB | +3.10 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (3.1 dB).
The new Bridgestone Turanza 6 continued Bridgestones excellent performance in the rolling resistance tests, leading the Hankook and Uniroyal.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.42 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.63 kg/t | +0.21 kg/t | £12 | |
| 7.67 kg/t | +0.25 kg/t | £15 | |
| 7.78 kg/t | +0.36 kg/t | £21 | |
| 8.16 kg/t | +0.74 kg/t | £44 | |
| 8.34 kg/t | +0.92 kg/t | £55 | |
| 8.35 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t | £55 | |
| 8.44 kg/t | +1.02 kg/t | £61 | |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.07 kg/t | £64 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +1.17 kg/t | £70 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +1.17 kg/t | £70 | |
| 9.56 kg/t | +2.14 kg/t | £127 |
The difference between best and worst was 28.8% (2.14 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Aplus A919 uses about 88 L (£127) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
The Aplus was the cheapest tyre on test, but this time the Michelin wasn't the most expensive tyre of the group, it was the joint most expensive with Goodyear!
Results
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
225/65 R17 106V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 35.2 m | +0.60 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 103.3 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 12 | 49.9 m | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 86.8 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 1st / 12 | 14.41 s | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 95.9 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 2.95 m/sec2 | Best in this discipline |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 8265 N | Best in this discipline |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 66 km/h | -0.60 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 7744 N | -1,142.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 2474 N | -450.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 3022 N | -239.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 68.9 dB | +1.60 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 8th / 12 | 8.44 kg/t | +1.02 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Price
- 610.00
Bridgestone Turanza 6
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 12 | 36.6 m | +2.00 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 102.4 km/h | -0.90 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 12 | 53 m | +3.10 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 86.4 km/h | -0.40 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 14.58 s | +0.17 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 89 km/h | -6.90 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 2.76 m/sec2 | -0.19 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 8254 N | -11.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 65.7 km/h | -0.90 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 8346 N | -540.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 2289 N | -635.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 2930 N | -331.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 12 | 69.4 dB | +2.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 12 | 7.42 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
- EU Label
- B/A/69
- Price
- 570.00
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
225/65 R17 106H XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 12 | 36.2 m | +1.60 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 100.4 km/h | -2.90 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 12 | 52.9 m | +3.00 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 84.8 km/h | -2.00 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 11th / 12 | 15.01 s | +0.60 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 91 km/h | -4.90 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 2.88 m/sec2 | -0.07 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 8140 N | -125.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 66.4 km/h | -0.20 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 8422 N | -464.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 2444 N | -480.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 2870 N | -391.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 8th / 12 | 69.6 dB | +2.30 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 10th / 12 | 8.59 kg/t | +1.17 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/69
- Price
- 465.00
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
225/65 R17 106V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 12 | 36.5 m | +1.90 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 100.5 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 52.1 m | +2.20 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 85.2 km/h | -1.60 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 6th / 12 | 14.74 s | +0.33 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 90.2 km/h | -5.70 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 2.83 m/sec2 | -0.12 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 7871 N | -394.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 66.1 km/h | -0.50 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 8102 N | -784.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 2505 N | -419.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 2930 N | -331.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 12 | 67.3 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 9th / 12 | 8.49 kg/t | +1.07 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/71
- Price
- 610.00
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 12 | 35.5 m | +0.90 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 100.5 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 12 | 52.6 m | +2.70 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 85.4 km/h | -1.40 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 5th / 12 | 14.72 s | +0.31 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 86.2 km/h | -9.70 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 2.57 m/sec2 | -0.38 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 7796 N | -469.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 66.5 km/h | -0.10 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 8304 N | -582.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 2435 N | -489.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 2803 N | -458.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 11th / 12 | 70.2 dB | +2.90 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 7.63 kg/t | +0.21 kg/t |
- EU Label
- B/A/69
- Price
- 485.00
Pirelli CINTURATO P7
225/65 R17 106V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 12 | 34.6 m | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 102.7 km/h | -0.60 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 52.2 m | +2.30 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 85.7 km/h | -1.10 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 14.46 s | +0.05 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 90.9 km/h | -5.00 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 2.91 m/sec2 | -0.04 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 7140 N | -1,125.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 66.6 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 7998 N | -888.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 2397 N | -527.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 2337 N | -924.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 9th / 12 | 70.1 dB | +2.80 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 12 | 8.35 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/70
- Price
- 590.00
Uniroyal RainExpert 5
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 11th / 12 | 37.9 m | +3.30 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 97.9 km/h | -5.40 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 12 | 53.8 m | +3.90 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 85 km/h | -1.80 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 9th / 12 | 14.83 s | +0.42 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 94.5 km/h | -1.40 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 2.93 m/sec2 | -0.02 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 8104 N | -161.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 66.2 km/h | -0.40 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 8398 N | -488.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 2669 N | -255.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 3204 N | -57.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 12 | 69.3 dB | +2.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 7.67 kg/t | +0.25 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/71
- Price
- 475.00
Toyo Proxes Comfort
225/65 R17 106V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 12 | 35.7 m | +1.10 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 101.7 km/h | -1.60 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 9th / 12 | 54.7 m | +4.80 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 85.5 km/h | -1.30 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 4th / 12 | 14.64 s | +0.23 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 87.1 km/h | -8.80 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 2.56 m/sec2 | -0.39 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 7523 N | -742.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 65.1 km/h | -1.50 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 7407 N | -1,479.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 2589 N | -335.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 2522 N | -739.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 12 | 69.3 dB | +2.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 12 | 8.16 kg/t | +0.74 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/70
- Price
- 430.00
General Grabber GT+
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 10th / 12 | 37.2 m | +2.60 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 98.4 km/h | -4.90 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 10th / 12 | 55 m | +5.10 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 84.3 km/h | -2.50 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 10th / 12 | 14.9 s | +0.49 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 87.8 km/h | -8.10 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 2.48 m/sec2 | -0.47 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 7752 N | -513.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 65.9 km/h | -0.70 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 8886 N | Best in this discipline |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 2415 N | -509.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 2930 N | -331.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 12 | 69.1 dB | +1.80 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 12 | 7.78 kg/t | +0.36 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/71
- Price
- 510.00
Nexen N Fera Sport SUV
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 35.3 m | +0.70 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 99.9 km/h | -3.40 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 7th / 12 | 53.6 m | +3.70 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 84.4 km/h | -2.40 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 8th / 12 | 14.79 s | +0.38 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 87.8 km/h | -8.10 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 2.64 m/sec2 | -0.31 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 7499 N | -766.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 65.3 km/h | -1.30 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 8102 N | -784.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 2454 N | -470.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 2747 N | -514.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 68.3 dB | +1.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 10th / 12 | 8.59 kg/t | +1.17 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/A/71
- Price
- 350.00
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 9th / 12 | 37.1 m | +2.50 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 102 km/h | -1.30 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 11th / 12 | 61.1 m | +11.20 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 84 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 7th / 12 | 14.77 s | +0.36 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 83.8 km/h | -12.10 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 2.41 m/sec2 | -0.54 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 8239 N | -26.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 65.6 km/h | -1.00 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 7230 N | -1,656.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 2332 N | -592.00 N |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 2573 N | -688.00 N |
| NoiseLower is better | 12th / 12 | 70.4 dB | +3.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 12 | 8.34 kg/t | +0.92 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/70
- Price
- 420.00
Aplus A919
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 12th / 12 | 40.3 m | +5.70 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 97.4 km/h | -5.90 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 12th / 12 | 63.6 m | +13.70 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 82.5 km/h | -4.30 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 12th / 12 | 15.23 s | +0.82 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 83.9 km/h | -12.00 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 2.35 m/sec2 | -0.60 m/sec2 |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 8068 N | -197.00 N |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 66.2 km/h | -0.40 km/h |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 8012 N | -874.00 N |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 2924 N | Best in this discipline |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 3261 N | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 9th / 12 | 70.1 dB | +2.80 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 12th / 12 | 9.56 kg/t | +2.14 kg/t |
- EU Label
- E/C/71
- Price
- 300.00


These are cool tests, but I don't see why sand, dirt, mud, grass tractions are relevant to SUVs on summer tyres. People who buys jeep and stick to road tyres have little to no intention to venture offroad. Or if they do, they are deluding themselves. Just my (unpopular) opinion.
I don't disagree, but also people who are doing research into an suv kind of expect it. Grass and gravel do have real world applications. Mud is the craziest one really, a summer tyre has zero mud ability and mud testing is REALLY difficult to get trends even with MT tyres.
A rare A.B. test with no Conti contender.
I hadn't even noticed that! I assume they were testing in the difficult period between PC6 rundown and PC7 ram up!