Test Charts / Auto Bild
2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/40 R18
- Tyres tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 16
- Test vehicle
- BMW M135i
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
37.8 m | -4.80 m | 0 km/h |
| 42.6 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 42.9 m | +0.30 m | 11 km/h | |
| 43.5 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 43.7 m | +1.10 m | 21 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +1.50 m | 24 km/h | |
| 44.2 m | +1.60 m | 25 km/h | |
| 44.3 m | +1.70 m | 25 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 44.7 m | +2.10 m | 28 km/h | |
| 44.9 m | +2.30 m | 29 km/h | |
| 45.5 m | +2.90 m | 33 km/h | |
| 45.6 m | +3.00 m | 33 km/h | |
| 45.7 m | +3.10 m | 34 km/h | |
| 45.8 m | +3.20 m | 34 km/h | |
| 45.9 m | +3.30 m | 35 km/h | |
| 46 m | +3.40 m | 35 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
46.5 m | +3.90 m | 38 km/h |
| 46.9 m | +4.30 m | 39 km/h | |
| 46.9 m | +4.30 m | 39 km/h | |
| 47.2 m | +4.60 m | 41 km/h | |
| 47.3 m | +4.70 m | 41 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 25.1% (9.5 m ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 41 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
118 km/h | +1.10 km/h |
| 116.9 km/h | Best | |
| 116.7 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
| 116.5 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 116.4 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 115.8 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 115.6 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 115.2 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 115.1 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 114.9 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 114.8 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 114.7 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 114.7 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 114.5 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 114.4 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 114.4 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 114.4 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 114.3 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 114.1 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 113.4 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 112.8 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
111 km/h | -5.90 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5.9% (7 Km/H).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
47.8 m | -3.10 m | 0 km/h |
| 50.9 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 51.9 m | +1.00 m | 18 km/h | |
| 52 m | +1.10 m | 19 km/h | |
| 52 m | +1.10 m | 19 km/h | |
| 52.3 m | +1.40 m | 21 km/h | |
| 53.3 m | +2.40 m | 28 km/h | |
| 53.9 m | +3.00 m | 31 km/h | |
| 54.4 m | +3.50 m | 33 km/h | |
| 54.5 m | +3.60 m | 33 km/h | |
| 54.7 m | +3.80 m | 34 km/h | |
| 54.8 m | +3.90 m | 35 km/h | |
| 55.6 m | +4.70 m | 38 km/h | |
| 55.6 m | +4.70 m | 38 km/h | |
| 55.8 m | +4.90 m | 39 km/h | |
| 55.9 m | +5.00 m | 39 km/h | |
| 56.3 m | +5.40 m | 40 km/h | |
| 56.3 m | +5.40 m | 40 km/h | |
| 56.6 m | +5.70 m | 41 km/h | |
| 57.7 m | +6.80 m | 45 km/h | |
| 57.7 m | +6.80 m | 45 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
70.5 m | +19.60 m | 69 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 47.5% (22.7 m ≈ 5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 84.4 km/h | Best | |
| 83.9 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
83.8 km/h | -0.60 km/h |
| 83.4 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 82.6 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 82.3 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 82.2 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 82.1 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 81.6 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 81.6 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 81.5 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 81.1 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 81 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 80.9 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 80.8 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 80.8 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 80.4 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 80.3 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 80.2 km/h | -4.20 km/h | |
| 80.1 km/h | -4.30 km/h | |
| 79.8 km/h | -4.60 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
72.1 km/h | -12.30 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 14.6% (12.3 Km/H).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 12.04 s | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
12.07 s | +0.03 s |
| 12.11 s | +0.07 s | |
| 12.12 s | +0.08 s | |
| 12.17 s | +0.13 s | |
| 12.3 s | +0.26 s | |
| 12.33 s | +0.29 s | |
| 12.38 s | +0.34 s | |
| 12.43 s | +0.39 s | |
| 12.45 s | +0.41 s | |
| 12.46 s | +0.42 s | |
| 12.52 s | +0.48 s | |
| 12.52 s | +0.48 s | |
| 12.55 s | +0.51 s | |
| 12.56 s | +0.52 s | |
| 12.62 s | +0.58 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.59 s | |
| 12.66 s | +0.62 s | |
| 12.67 s | +0.63 s | |
| 12.69 s | +0.65 s | |
| 12.93 s | +0.89 s | |
RefReference Budget |
13.77 s | +1.73 s |
The difference between best and worst was 14.4% (1.73 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 77.3 km/h | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
77 km/h | -0.30 km/h |
| 76.9 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 76.5 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 76.4 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 76.4 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 76.3 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 76.3 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 76 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 76 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 75.9 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 75.4 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 75.2 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 75 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 75 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 74.1 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 71.9 km/h | -5.40 km/h | |
| 71.7 km/h | -5.60 km/h | |
| 71.6 km/h | -5.70 km/h | |
| 71.4 km/h | -5.90 km/h | |
| 71.1 km/h | -6.20 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
64.5 km/h | -12.80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 16.6% (12.8 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
2.93 m/sec2 | +0.21 m/sec2 |
| 2.72 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 2.65 m/sec2 | -0.07 m/sec2 | |
| 2.61 m/sec2 | -0.11 m/sec2 | |
| 2.55 m/sec2 | -0.17 m/sec2 | |
| 2.53 m/sec2 | -0.19 m/sec2 | |
| 2.52 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 2.5 m/sec2 | -0.22 m/sec2 | |
| 2.48 m/sec2 | -0.24 m/sec2 | |
| 2.45 m/sec2 | -0.27 m/sec2 | |
| 2.34 m/sec2 | -0.38 m/sec2 | |
| 2.32 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 2.32 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 2.23 m/sec2 | -0.49 m/sec2 | |
| 2.18 m/sec2 | -0.54 m/sec2 | |
| 2.13 m/sec2 | -0.59 m/sec2 | |
| 2.11 m/sec2 | -0.61 m/sec2 | |
| 2.09 m/sec2 | -0.63 m/sec2 | |
| 2.06 m/sec2 | -0.66 m/sec2 | |
| 2.04 m/sec2 | -0.68 m/sec2 | |
| 2 m/sec2 | -0.72 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Budget |
1.38 m/sec2 | -1.34 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 52.9% (1.55 m/sec2).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 27.3 m | +0.20 m | 11 km/h | |
| 27.5 m | +0.40 m | 16 km/h | |
| 27.8 m | +0.70 m | 21 km/h | |
| 28 m | +0.90 m | 23 km/h | |
| 28 m | +0.90 m | 23 km/h | |
| 28 m | +0.90 m | 23 km/h | |
| 28.1 m | +1.00 m | 25 km/h | |
| 28.2 m | +1.10 m | 26 km/h | |
| 28.2 m | +1.10 m | 26 km/h | |
| 28.2 m | +1.10 m | 26 km/h | |
| 28.3 m | +1.20 m | 27 km/h | |
| 28.5 m | +1.40 m | 29 km/h | |
| 28.6 m | +1.50 m | 30 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
28.6 m | +1.50 m | 30 km/h |
| 28.7 m | +1.60 m | 31 km/h | |
| 28.7 m | +1.60 m | 31 km/h | |
| 28.7 m | +1.60 m | 31 km/h | |
| 29 m | +1.90 m | 33 km/h | |
| 29.5 m | +2.40 m | 37 km/h | |
| 29.7 m | +2.60 m | 38 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
51.1 m | +24.00 m | 89 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 88.6% (24 m ≈ 5.3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Toyo Observe EWS1 would still be travelling at 38 km/h when the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2619 N | Best | |
| 2608 N | -11.00 N | |
| 2577 N | -42.00 N | |
| 2576 N | -43.00 N | |
| 2560 N | -59.00 N | |
| 2547 N | -72.00 N | |
| 2537 N | -82.00 N | |
| 2524 N | -95.00 N | |
| 2501 N | -118.00 N | |
RefReference Budget |
2501 N | -118.00 N |
| 2492 N | -127.00 N | |
| 2487 N | -132.00 N | |
| 2483 N | -136.00 N | |
| 2471 N | -148.00 N | |
| 2436 N | -183.00 N | |
| 2417 N | -202.00 N | |
| 2413 N | -206.00 N | |
| 2368 N | -251.00 N | |
| 2354 N | -265.00 N | |
| 2341 N | -278.00 N | |
| 2314 N | -305.00 N | |
RefReference Summer |
248 N | -2,371.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 90.5% (2,371 N).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 59.3 km/h | Best | |
| 59.3 km/h | Best | |
| 59.2 km/h | -0.10 km/h | |
| 59.1 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
| 59 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 58.7 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 58.6 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 58.6 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 58.5 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 58.4 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 58.1 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 58 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 58 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 57.9 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 57.8 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 57.6 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 57.6 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 57.2 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
56.1 km/h | -3.20 km/h |
| 55.7 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 55.3 km/h | -4.00 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (4 Km/H).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.03 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.03 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 2.99 m/sec2 | -0.04 m/sec2 | |
| 2.98 m/sec2 | -0.05 m/sec2 | |
| 2.95 m/sec2 | -0.08 m/sec2 | |
| 2.92 m/sec2 | -0.11 m/sec2 | |
| 2.89 m/sec2 | -0.14 m/sec2 | |
| 2.89 m/sec2 | -0.14 m/sec2 | |
| 2.88 m/sec2 | -0.15 m/sec2 | |
| 2.85 m/sec2 | -0.18 m/sec2 | |
| 2.84 m/sec2 | -0.19 m/sec2 | |
| 2.84 m/sec2 | -0.19 m/sec2 | |
| 2.81 m/sec2 | -0.22 m/sec2 | |
| 2.8 m/sec2 | -0.23 m/sec2 | |
| 2.8 m/sec2 | -0.23 m/sec2 | |
| 2.77 m/sec2 | -0.26 m/sec2 | |
| 2.76 m/sec2 | -0.27 m/sec2 | |
| 2.76 m/sec2 | -0.27 m/sec2 | |
| 2.74 m/sec2 | -0.29 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Budget |
2.69 m/sec2 | -0.34 m/sec2 |
| 2.61 m/sec2 | -0.42 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Summer |
1.81 m/sec2 | -1.22 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 40.3% (1.22 m/sec2).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 7.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 6.7 Points | -1.30 Points | |
| 6.7 Points | -1.30 Points | |
| 6.7 Points | -1.30 Points | |
| 6.7 Points | -1.30 Points | |
| 6.7 Points | -1.30 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (1.3 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
64.9 dB | -0.10 dB |
| 65 dB | Best | |
| 65 dB | Best | |
| 65.2 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 65.2 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 65.5 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 65.6 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 65.6 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 65.7 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 65.9 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 65.9 dB | +0.90 dB | |
RefReference Budget |
66.1 dB | +1.10 dB |
| 66.3 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 66.3 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 66.3 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 66.5 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 66.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 66.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 66.8 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 66.9 dB | +1.90 dB | |
| 67 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 67.6 dB | +2.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (2.7 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53,000 KM | Best | |
| 53,000 KM | Best | |
| 51,940 KM | -1,060 KM | |
| 51,940 KM | -1,060 KM | |
| 50,880 KM | -2,120 KM | |
| 49,820 KM | -3,180 KM | |
| 48,230 KM | -4,770 KM | |
| 47,700 KM | -5,300 KM | |
| 47,170 KM | -5,830 KM | |
| 46,640 KM | -6,360 KM | |
| 46,110 KM | -6,890 KM | |
| 45,580 KM | -7,420 KM | |
| 45,050 KM | -7,950 KM | |
| 45,050 KM | -7,950 KM | |
| 45,050 KM | -7,950 KM | |
| 44,520 KM | -8,480 KM | |
| 43,990 KM | -9,010 KM | |
| 43,990 KM | -9,010 KM | |
| 37,630 KM | -15,370 KM | |
| 33,920 KM | -19,080 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 36% (19,080 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.32 Price/1000 | Best | €13.08 | |
| 7.81 Price/1000 | +0.49 Price/1000 | €18.16 | |
| 8.44 Price/1000 | +1.12 Price/1000 | €9.99 | |
| 9.24 Price/1000 | +1.92 Price/1000 | €14.43 | |
| 9.63 Price/1000 | +2.31 Price/1000 | €14.03 | |
| 9.64 Price/1000 | +2.32 Price/1000 | €12.20 | |
| 9.66 Price/1000 | +2.34 Price/1000 | €14.39 | |
| 9.99 Price/1000 | +2.67 Price/1000 | €13.96 | |
| 10 Price/1000 | +2.68 Price/1000 | €15.43 | |
| 10.02 Price/1000 | +2.70 Price/1000 | €14.15 | |
| 10.94 Price/1000 | +3.62 Price/1000 | €16.99 | |
| 11.1 Price/1000 | +3.78 Price/1000 | €15.88 | |
| 11.14 Price/1000 | +3.82 Price/1000 | €14.02 | |
| 11.19 Price/1000 | +3.87 Price/1000 | €15.95 | |
| 11.32 Price/1000 | +4.00 Price/1000 | €15.26 | |
| 12.86 Price/1000 | +5.54 Price/1000 | €18.66 | |
| 13.08 Price/1000 | +5.76 Price/1000 | €15.43 | |
| 13.29 Price/1000 | +5.97 Price/1000 | €20.38 | |
| 13.36 Price/1000 | +6.04 Price/1000 | €18.00 | |
| 15.04 Price/1000 | +7.72 Price/1000 | €21.38 |
The difference between best and worst was 105.5% (7.72 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Barum Polaris 6) works out €456 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.77 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 8.02 kg/t | +0.25 kg/t | £14 | |
| 8.09 kg/t | +0.32 kg/t | £18 | |
| 8.15 kg/t | +0.38 kg/t | £22 | |
| 8.48 kg/t | +0.71 kg/t | £40 | |
RefReference Summer |
8.54 kg/t | +0.77 kg/t | £44 |
| 8.54 kg/t | +0.77 kg/t | £44 | |
| 8.58 kg/t | +0.81 kg/t | £46 | |
| 8.65 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | £50 | |
| 8.7 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t | £53 | |
| 8.7 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t | £53 | |
| 8.72 kg/t | +0.95 kg/t | £54 | |
| 8.72 kg/t | +0.95 kg/t | £54 | |
| 8.9 kg/t | +1.13 kg/t | £64 | |
| 8.9 kg/t | +1.13 kg/t | £64 | |
| 9.03 kg/t | +1.26 kg/t | £71 | |
| 9.05 kg/t | +1.28 kg/t | £73 | |
| 9.07 kg/t | +1.30 kg/t | £74 | |
| 9.16 kg/t | +1.39 kg/t | £79 | |
| 9.31 kg/t | +1.54 kg/t | £87 | |
RefReference Budget |
9.9 kg/t | +2.13 kg/t | £121 |
| 10.37 kg/t | +2.60 kg/t | £148 |
The difference between best and worst was 33.5% (2.6 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 102 L (£148) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tyres tested
18 of these 20 tyres tested again
2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets
245/45 R1950 tyres tested
14 of these 20 tyres tested again
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tyres tested
12 of these 20 tyres tested again

