Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/40 R18
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
16
Test vehicle
BMW M135i

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
37.8 m -4.80 m 0 km/h
42.6 m Best 0 km/h
42.9 m +0.30 m 11 km/h
43.5 m +0.90 m 19 km/h
43.7 m +1.10 m 21 km/h
44.1 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
44.2 m +1.60 m 25 km/h
44.3 m +1.70 m 25 km/h
44.5 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
44.7 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
44.9 m +2.30 m 29 km/h
45.5 m +2.90 m 33 km/h
45.6 m +3.00 m 33 km/h
45.7 m +3.10 m 34 km/h
45.8 m +3.20 m 34 km/h
45.9 m +3.30 m 35 km/h
46 m +3.40 m 35 km/h
RefReference Budget
46.5 m +3.90 m 38 km/h
46.9 m +4.30 m 39 km/h
46.9 m +4.30 m 39 km/h
47.2 m +4.60 m 41 km/h
47.3 m +4.70 m 41 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 25.1% (9.5 m ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 41 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
118 km/h +1.10 km/h
116.9 km/h Best
116.7 km/h -0.20 km/h
116.5 km/h -0.40 km/h
116.4 km/h -0.50 km/h
115.8 km/h -1.10 km/h
115.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
115.2 km/h -1.70 km/h
115.1 km/h -1.80 km/h
114.9 km/h -2.00 km/h
114.8 km/h -2.10 km/h
114.7 km/h -2.20 km/h
114.7 km/h -2.20 km/h
114.5 km/h -2.40 km/h
114.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
114.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
114.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
114.3 km/h -2.60 km/h
114.1 km/h -2.80 km/h
113.4 km/h -3.50 km/h
112.8 km/h -4.10 km/h
RefReference Budget
111 km/h -5.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.9% (7 Km/H).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
47.8 m -3.10 m 0 km/h
50.9 m Best 0 km/h
51.9 m +1.00 m 18 km/h
52 m +1.10 m 19 km/h
52 m +1.10 m 19 km/h
52.3 m +1.40 m 21 km/h
53.3 m +2.40 m 28 km/h
53.9 m +3.00 m 31 km/h
54.4 m +3.50 m 33 km/h
54.5 m +3.60 m 33 km/h
54.7 m +3.80 m 34 km/h
54.8 m +3.90 m 35 km/h
55.6 m +4.70 m 38 km/h
55.6 m +4.70 m 38 km/h
55.8 m +4.90 m 39 km/h
55.9 m +5.00 m 39 km/h
56.3 m +5.40 m 40 km/h
56.3 m +5.40 m 40 km/h
56.6 m +5.70 m 41 km/h
57.7 m +6.80 m 45 km/h
57.7 m +6.80 m 45 km/h
RefReference Budget
70.5 m +19.60 m 69 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 47.5% (22.7 m ≈ 5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
84.4 km/h Best
83.9 km/h -0.50 km/h
RefReference Summer
83.8 km/h -0.60 km/h
83.4 km/h -1.00 km/h
82.6 km/h -1.80 km/h
82.3 km/h -2.10 km/h
82.2 km/h -2.20 km/h
82.1 km/h -2.30 km/h
81.6 km/h -2.80 km/h
81.6 km/h -2.80 km/h
81.5 km/h -2.90 km/h
81.1 km/h -3.30 km/h
81 km/h -3.40 km/h
80.9 km/h -3.50 km/h
80.8 km/h -3.60 km/h
80.8 km/h -3.60 km/h
80.4 km/h -4.00 km/h
80.3 km/h -4.10 km/h
80.2 km/h -4.20 km/h
80.1 km/h -4.30 km/h
79.8 km/h -4.60 km/h
RefReference Budget
72.1 km/h -12.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.6% (12.3 Km/H).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
12.04 s Best
RefReference Summer
12.07 s +0.03 s
12.11 s +0.07 s
12.12 s +0.08 s
12.17 s +0.13 s
12.3 s +0.26 s
12.33 s +0.29 s
12.38 s +0.34 s
12.43 s +0.39 s
12.45 s +0.41 s
12.46 s +0.42 s
12.52 s +0.48 s
12.52 s +0.48 s
12.55 s +0.51 s
12.56 s +0.52 s
12.62 s +0.58 s
12.63 s +0.59 s
12.66 s +0.62 s
12.67 s +0.63 s
12.69 s +0.65 s
12.93 s +0.89 s
RefReference Budget
13.77 s +1.73 s

The difference between best and worst was 14.4% (1.73 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
77.3 km/h Best
RefReference Summer
77 km/h -0.30 km/h
76.9 km/h -0.40 km/h
76.5 km/h -0.80 km/h
76.4 km/h -0.90 km/h
76.4 km/h -0.90 km/h
76.3 km/h -1.00 km/h
76.3 km/h -1.00 km/h
76 km/h -1.30 km/h
76 km/h -1.30 km/h
75.9 km/h -1.40 km/h
75.4 km/h -1.90 km/h
75.2 km/h -2.10 km/h
75 km/h -2.30 km/h
75 km/h -2.30 km/h
74.1 km/h -3.20 km/h
71.9 km/h -5.40 km/h
71.7 km/h -5.60 km/h
71.6 km/h -5.70 km/h
71.4 km/h -5.90 km/h
71.1 km/h -6.20 km/h
RefReference Budget
64.5 km/h -12.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 16.6% (12.8 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
2.93 m/sec2 +0.21 m/sec2
2.72 m/sec2 Best
2.65 m/sec2 -0.07 m/sec2
2.61 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
2.55 m/sec2 -0.17 m/sec2
2.53 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
2.52 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
2.5 m/sec2 -0.22 m/sec2
2.48 m/sec2 -0.24 m/sec2
2.45 m/sec2 -0.27 m/sec2
2.34 m/sec2 -0.38 m/sec2
2.32 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
2.32 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
2.23 m/sec2 -0.49 m/sec2
2.18 m/sec2 -0.54 m/sec2
2.13 m/sec2 -0.59 m/sec2
2.11 m/sec2 -0.61 m/sec2
2.09 m/sec2 -0.63 m/sec2
2.06 m/sec2 -0.66 m/sec2
2.04 m/sec2 -0.68 m/sec2
2 m/sec2 -0.72 m/sec2
RefReference Budget
1.38 m/sec2 -1.34 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 52.9% (1.55 m/sec2).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
27.1 m Best 0 km/h
27.3 m +0.20 m 11 km/h
27.5 m +0.40 m 16 km/h
27.8 m +0.70 m 21 km/h
28 m +0.90 m 23 km/h
28 m +0.90 m 23 km/h
28 m +0.90 m 23 km/h
28.1 m +1.00 m 25 km/h
28.2 m +1.10 m 26 km/h
28.2 m +1.10 m 26 km/h
28.2 m +1.10 m 26 km/h
28.3 m +1.20 m 27 km/h
28.5 m +1.40 m 29 km/h
28.6 m +1.50 m 30 km/h
RefReference Budget
28.6 m +1.50 m 30 km/h
28.7 m +1.60 m 31 km/h
28.7 m +1.60 m 31 km/h
28.7 m +1.60 m 31 km/h
29 m +1.90 m 33 km/h
29.5 m +2.40 m 37 km/h
29.7 m +2.60 m 38 km/h
RefReference Summer
51.1 m +24.00 m 89 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 88.6% (24 m ≈ 5.3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Toyo Observe EWS1 would still be travelling at 38 km/h when the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2619 N Best
2608 N -11.00 N
2577 N -42.00 N
2576 N -43.00 N
2560 N -59.00 N
2547 N -72.00 N
2537 N -82.00 N
2524 N -95.00 N
2501 N -118.00 N
RefReference Budget
2501 N -118.00 N
2492 N -127.00 N
2487 N -132.00 N
2483 N -136.00 N
2471 N -148.00 N
2436 N -183.00 N
2417 N -202.00 N
2413 N -206.00 N
2368 N -251.00 N
2354 N -265.00 N
2341 N -278.00 N
2314 N -305.00 N
RefReference Summer
248 N -2,371.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 90.5% (2,371 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
59.3 km/h Best
59.3 km/h Best
59.2 km/h -0.10 km/h
59.1 km/h -0.20 km/h
59 km/h -0.30 km/h
58.7 km/h -0.60 km/h
58.6 km/h -0.70 km/h
58.6 km/h -0.70 km/h
58.5 km/h -0.80 km/h
58.4 km/h -0.90 km/h
58.1 km/h -1.20 km/h
58 km/h -1.30 km/h
58 km/h -1.30 km/h
57.9 km/h -1.40 km/h
57.8 km/h -1.50 km/h
57.6 km/h -1.70 km/h
57.6 km/h -1.70 km/h
57.2 km/h -2.10 km/h
RefReference Budget
56.1 km/h -3.20 km/h
55.7 km/h -3.60 km/h
55.3 km/h -4.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (4 Km/H).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.03 m/sec2 Best
3.03 m/sec2 Best
2.99 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
2.98 m/sec2 -0.05 m/sec2
2.95 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
2.92 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
2.89 m/sec2 -0.14 m/sec2
2.89 m/sec2 -0.14 m/sec2
2.88 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
2.85 m/sec2 -0.18 m/sec2
2.84 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
2.84 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
2.81 m/sec2 -0.22 m/sec2
2.8 m/sec2 -0.23 m/sec2
2.8 m/sec2 -0.23 m/sec2
2.77 m/sec2 -0.26 m/sec2
2.76 m/sec2 -0.27 m/sec2
2.76 m/sec2 -0.27 m/sec2
2.74 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
RefReference Budget
2.69 m/sec2 -0.34 m/sec2
2.61 m/sec2 -0.42 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
1.81 m/sec2 -1.22 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 40.3% (1.22 m/sec2).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TyreResultGap to best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (1.3 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
64.9 dB -0.10 dB
65 dB Best
65 dB Best
65.2 dB +0.20 dB
65.2 dB +0.20 dB
65.5 dB +0.50 dB
65.6 dB +0.60 dB
65.6 dB +0.60 dB
65.7 dB +0.70 dB
65.9 dB +0.90 dB
65.9 dB +0.90 dB
RefReference Budget
66.1 dB +1.10 dB
66.3 dB +1.30 dB
66.3 dB +1.30 dB
66.3 dB +1.30 dB
66.5 dB +1.50 dB
66.7 dB +1.70 dB
66.7 dB +1.70 dB
66.8 dB +1.80 dB
66.9 dB +1.90 dB
67 dB +2.00 dB
67.6 dB +2.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (2.7 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
53,000 KM Best
53,000 KM Best
51,940 KM -1,060 KM
51,940 KM -1,060 KM
50,880 KM -2,120 KM
49,820 KM -3,180 KM
48,230 KM -4,770 KM
47,700 KM -5,300 KM
47,170 KM -5,830 KM
46,640 KM -6,360 KM
46,110 KM -6,890 KM
45,580 KM -7,420 KM
45,050 KM -7,950 KM
45,050 KM -7,950 KM
45,050 KM -7,950 KM
44,520 KM -8,480 KM
43,990 KM -9,010 KM
43,990 KM -9,010 KM
37,630 KM -15,370 KM
33,920 KM -19,080 KM

The difference between best and worst was 36% (19,080 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
7.32 Price/1000 Best €13.08
7.81 Price/1000 +0.49 Price/1000 €18.16
8.44 Price/1000 +1.12 Price/1000 €9.99
9.24 Price/1000 +1.92 Price/1000 €14.43
9.63 Price/1000 +2.31 Price/1000 €14.03
9.64 Price/1000 +2.32 Price/1000 €12.20
9.66 Price/1000 +2.34 Price/1000 €14.39
9.99 Price/1000 +2.67 Price/1000 €13.96
10 Price/1000 +2.68 Price/1000 €15.43
10.02 Price/1000 +2.70 Price/1000 €14.15
10.94 Price/1000 +3.62 Price/1000 €16.99
11.1 Price/1000 +3.78 Price/1000 €15.88
11.14 Price/1000 +3.82 Price/1000 €14.02
11.19 Price/1000 +3.87 Price/1000 €15.95
11.32 Price/1000 +4.00 Price/1000 €15.26
12.86 Price/1000 +5.54 Price/1000 €18.66
13.08 Price/1000 +5.76 Price/1000 €15.43
13.29 Price/1000 +5.97 Price/1000 €20.38
13.36 Price/1000 +6.04 Price/1000 €18.00
15.04 Price/1000 +7.72 Price/1000 €21.38

The difference between best and worst was 105.5% (7.72 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Barum Polaris 6) works out €456 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.77 kg/t Best £0
8.02 kg/t +0.25 kg/t £14
8.09 kg/t +0.32 kg/t £18
8.15 kg/t +0.38 kg/t £22
8.48 kg/t +0.71 kg/t £40
RefReference Summer
8.54 kg/t +0.77 kg/t £44
8.54 kg/t +0.77 kg/t £44
8.58 kg/t +0.81 kg/t £46
8.65 kg/t +0.88 kg/t £50
8.7 kg/t +0.93 kg/t £53
8.7 kg/t +0.93 kg/t £53
8.72 kg/t +0.95 kg/t £54
8.72 kg/t +0.95 kg/t £54
8.9 kg/t +1.13 kg/t £64
8.9 kg/t +1.13 kg/t £64
9.03 kg/t +1.26 kg/t £71
9.05 kg/t +1.28 kg/t £73
9.07 kg/t +1.30 kg/t £74
9.16 kg/t +1.39 kg/t £79
9.31 kg/t +1.54 kg/t £87
RefReference Budget
9.9 kg/t +2.13 kg/t £121
10.37 kg/t +2.60 kg/t £148

The difference between best and worst was 33.5% (2.6 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 102 L (£148) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.