Menu

Yokohama BluEarth AE50 Test Results

Tested 2015 to 2020 3 publications

Tested 6 times by independent publications, the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 averages a finish of 13th.

  • 6Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 13thAverage finish
  • 41%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

Record by discipline

Where the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 2 P12.5 of 15 22% -
Dry Handling 2 P5.5 of 15 62% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P8 of 20 63% -
Wet
Wet Braking 2 P8 of 15 54% -
Wet Handling 2 P9 of 15 49% -
Subj. Wet Handling 1 P13 of 20 37% -
Straight Aqua 2 P12 of 15 22% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 1 P4 of 20 84% -
Noise 2 P3 of 15 84% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 2 P3 of 15 84% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Yokohama BluEarth AE50. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Dunlop Sport BluResponse 5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind 5 0 5 - 0%
Nokian Line 4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind 4 2 2 - 50%
Nexen N Blue HD+ 4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind 4 2 2 - 50%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue 4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind 4 1 3 - 25%
Fulda EcoControl HP 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Continental Premium Contact 5 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Maxxis Premitra HP5 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Vredestein Sportrac 5 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Bridgestone Turanza T005 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 6 tests. Updated November 16, 2025.

Across six summer tests, the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 delivers mixed performance: competitive subjective comfort, low noise, and strong rolling resistance efficiency, but inconsistent safety-critical grip, particularly in wet and some dry braking scenarios. It posts mid-pack to lower-mid overall rankings (avg. 12.7), with one solid 2019 showing but otherwise trailing leaders. Notable highlight is excellent projected wear in 2016 AutoBild, indicating strong longevity/value potential, yet wet aquaplaning and wet handling gaps limit its overall competitiveness.

Performance Strengths

  • Rolling Resistance and Efficiency Strong
    Details
    • 3rd/20 rolling resistance (+14.8% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • 3rd/10 rolling resistance (+6.7% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Noise/Comfort Refinement Strong
    Details
    • Noise 71 dB, 3rd/20 (+1.4% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • Noise 70 dB, 3rd/10 (+2.9% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
    • Subjective comfort 7 pts, 4th/20 (+12.5% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
  • Tread Wear/Longevity Strong
    Details
    • Projected wear winner at 42,660 km in 2016 AutoBild full test (article mention)
    • Article: "Unsurprisingly Yokohama win" on wear in 2016 AutoBild
  • Dry Handling Stability Moderate
    Details
    • Dry handling 5th/20 (+0.7% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • Dry handling 6th/10 (+1.9% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Overall Competitiveness in Mid-Size Segment Moderate
    Details
    • 6th/10 overall in 2019 Auto Zeitung; editorial note: "Maxxis, Yokohama and Bridgestone all having excellent results"
    • 13/50 in 2016 AutoBild braking shootout (advanced to full test)
  • Dry handling Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Value for money Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details

Performance Weaknesses

  • Dry Braking Performance Strong
    Details
    • 18th/20 in dry braking (+8.5% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • 7th/10 in dry braking (+5% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Wet Handling and Control Moderate
    Details
    • 14th/20 wet handling (+9.3% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung; subjective wet 13th/20 (+71.1% from best)
    • 4th/10 wet handling (+3.8% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung (variable)
  • Aquaplaning Resistance Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Straight aquaplaning 16th/20 (+13.8% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • Straight aquaplaning 8th/10 (+5.7% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Value/Price Competitiveness Moderate
    Details
    • Price 16th/20 (+82.6% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • Price 6th/10 (+77.4% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Overall Consistency Across Tests Strong
    Details
    • Average overall position 12.7 over 6 tests
    • 22nd/47 in 2018 AutoBild braking prelim; 12th/15 in 2016 AutoBild full test; 12th/12 in 2015 ACE
  • Wet braking Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Wet grip Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 (3 tests) and 31 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Ride comfort strength in 1 of 3 tests 8 praise, 3 criticise of 31 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry handling strength in 2 of 3 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 31 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Rolling resistance strength in 1 of 3 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 31 reviews · Read those reviews

Where they disagree

  • Wet grip weakness in 1 of 3 tests 13 praise, 2 criticise of 31 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Tread life strength in 1 of 3 tests 3 praise, 8 criticise of 31 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tyre

Every test, newest first 6

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2020 1 test
2019 1 test
2018 1 test
2016 2 tests
2015 1 test

Back to the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Yokohama tyres

Overview

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.