Test Publication:
225/50 R17
20 tyres
4 categories
Images courtesy of Auto Zeitung
Test Publication:
Images courtesy of Auto Zeitung
Test Size:
225/50 R17
Tyres Tested:
20 tyres
The 2020 Auto Zeitung summer tyre test has been published, and as usual they've tested a really interesting mix of twenty tyres in the popular 225/50 R17 size.
As 225/50 R17 tyres generally bias towards comfort rather than outright sporty performance, AZ tested with the new brand BMW 3 Series, and performed the usual array of thirteen dry, wet, comfort and economy tests.
Proving that you get what you pay for, the top three tyres in the test were also the most expensive! Continental took the top spot, with excellent wet handling, short braking distances and good levels of comfort, while Michelin and Bridgestone tied for second place, with the Michelin performing better in the wet, and the Bridgestone having a very good dry performance.
A number of tyres performed very poorly in the wet, with the testers actually voicing safety concerns about one of the patterns tested! Read on for the full details below.
Dry
While Hankook could only manage fifth place overall, the Ventus Prime 3 had an unusually large advantage in dry braking. The top three tyres overall placed second to fourth, with Falken, Maxxis and Linglong close behind.
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Linglong Green Max
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Goodride SA37
- Star Performer UHP 3
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
The Maxxis HP5 was narrowly fastest during the dry handling testing, and combined the fastest lap time with the best subjective handling score. The similarly priced Giti should be proud of their new tyres performance in the dry, also out performing the more expensive premium rivals.
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Star Performer UHP 3
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Goodride SA37
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Linglong Green Max
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Star Performer UHP 3
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Goodride SA37
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Linglong Green Max
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
Wet
Bridgestone and Michelin drew during wet braking, stopping the car a full meter shorter than the third placed Continental. This time Linglong was the stand out performer from the cheaper tyres on test.
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Linglong Green Max
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Goodride SA37
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
- Star Performer UHP 3
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
Continental improved on its braking result, finishing fastest by a good margin during wet handling testing. The top three tyres from the wet handling lap were also the highest rated subjectively.
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Linglong Green Max
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Goodride SA37
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Star Performer UHP 3
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Linglong Green Max
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
- Goodride SA37
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Star Performer UHP 3
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
Vredestein had a significant advantage during the aquaplaning testing.
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Star Performer UHP 3
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Goodride SA37
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Linglong Green Max
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
- Firestone RoadHawk
Environment
Pirelli won its first test by having the lowest rolling resistance on test.
All twenty tyres were split by 3dB in the external noise test.
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Linglong Green Max
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Goodride SA37
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
- Star Performer UHP 3
Pirelli, Vredestein and Dunlop proved to be the most comfortable tyres.
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Star Performer UHP 3
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Goodride SA37
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
- Linglong Green Max
While the Goodride, Achilles and Star Performer tyres were the cheapest on test, when you look at the overall results below you'll understand why choosing a tyre based on price might not be the safest idea.
- Goodride SA37
- Star Performer UHP 3
- Westlake Sport SA37
- Achilles ATR Sport 2
- Linglong Green Max
- Rotalla RU01 S Pace
- Nankang Noble Sport NS20
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Giti GitiPremium H1
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
- Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Yokohama BluEarth AE50
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Michelin Primacy 4
Results
Very short braking distance and balanced wet handling, good handling and high grip in the dry.
None mentioned.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
35.8 M |
35.1 M |
+0.7 M |
98.04% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
74.3 s |
73.8 s |
+0.5 s |
99.33% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
4th |
26 Points |
30 Points |
-4 Points |
86.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
58.3 M |
57.3 M |
+1 M |
98.28% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
88.8 s |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
1st |
45 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
90.7 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-11.7 Km/H |
88.57% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
19th |
470 |
230 |
+240 |
48.94% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
7.93 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+1.6 kg / t |
79.82% |
Good handling in the wet, short dry braking distances, good dry stability.
None mentioned.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
35.9 M |
35.1 M |
+0.8 M |
97.77% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
74.2 s |
73.8 s |
+0.4 s |
99.46% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
3rd |
27 Points |
30 Points |
-3 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
57.3 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
92.3 s |
88.8 s |
+3.5 s |
96.21% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
4th |
33 Points |
45 Points |
-12 Points |
73.33% |
| Straight Aqua |
13th |
88.8 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-13.6 Km/H |
86.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
18th |
450 |
230 |
+220 |
51.11% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.45 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+1.12 kg / t |
84.97% |
Excellent handling, traction and wet braking performance, short braking distance on dry surfaces, low rolling resistance.
Average steering feel in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
36.1 M |
35.1 M |
+1 M |
97.23% |
| Dry Handling |
12th |
75 s |
73.8 s |
+1.2 s |
98.4% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
12th |
19 Points |
30 Points |
-11 Points |
63.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
57.3 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
90.8 s |
88.8 s |
+2 s |
97.8% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
2nd |
42 Points |
45 Points |
-3 Points |
93.33% |
| Straight Aqua |
17th |
88.2 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-14.2 Km/H |
86.13% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
13th |
6 Points |
8 Points |
-2 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
20th |
540 |
230 |
+310 |
42.59% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.29 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+0.96 kg / t |
86.83% |
Predictable handling on dry surfaces, including during sharp maneuvers, good wet handling, well priced.
Long wet braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
36.4 M |
35.1 M |
+1.3 M |
96.43% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
73.8 s |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
1st |
30 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
63 M |
57.3 M |
+5.7 M |
90.95% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
91.1 s |
88.8 s |
+2.3 s |
97.48% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
3rd |
40 Points |
45 Points |
-5 Points |
88.89% |
| Straight Aqua |
13th |
88.8 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-13.6 Km/H |
86.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
8th |
340 |
230 |
+110 |
67.65% |
| Rolling Resistance |
16th |
8.57 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+2.24 kg / t |
73.86% |
Good wet traction, short dry braking, good dry handling.
Understeer in the wet.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
35.1 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
74.3 s |
73.8 s |
+0.5 s |
99.33% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
4th |
26 Points |
30 Points |
-4 Points |
86.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
60.3 M |
57.3 M |
+3 M |
95.02% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
92.7 s |
88.8 s |
+3.9 s |
95.79% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
5th |
30 Points |
45 Points |
-15 Points |
66.67% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
91.1 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-11.3 Km/H |
88.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
12th |
390 |
230 |
+160 |
58.97% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
7.82 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+1.49 kg / t |
80.95% |
Very high aquaplaning resistance, good comfort, low noise.
Long wet braking, poor dry stability and long dry braking distances.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
20th |
38.3 M |
35.1 M |
+3.2 M |
91.64% |
| Dry Handling |
14th |
75.2 s |
73.8 s |
+1.4 s |
98.14% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
14th |
17 Points |
30 Points |
-13 Points |
56.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
61.4 M |
57.3 M |
+4.1 M |
93.32% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
93.5 s |
88.8 s |
+4.7 s |
94.97% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
7th |
26 Points |
45 Points |
-19 Points |
57.78% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
102.4 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
8 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Noise |
1st |
70 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
11th |
370 |
230 |
+140 |
62.16% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+1.67 kg / t |
79.13% |
Low fuel use, short dry braking.
Poor wet grip.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
36.7 M |
35.1 M |
+1.6 M |
95.64% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
74.3 s |
73.8 s |
+0.5 s |
99.33% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
9th |
23 Points |
30 Points |
-7 Points |
76.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
17th |
66.3 M |
57.3 M |
+9 M |
86.43% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
94.2 s |
88.8 s |
+5.4 s |
94.27% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
8th |
22 Points |
45 Points |
-23 Points |
48.89% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
90.3 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-12.1 Km/H |
88.18% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
8 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
15th |
410 |
230 |
+180 |
56.1% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
6.89 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+0.56 kg / t |
91.87% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, good wet handling, short dry braking.
Weak lateral stability and understeer in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
36.3 M |
35.1 M |
+1.2 M |
96.69% |
| Dry Handling |
18th |
75.8 s |
73.8 s |
+2 s |
97.36% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
18th |
14 Points |
30 Points |
-16 Points |
46.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
59.5 M |
57.3 M |
+2.2 M |
96.3% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
93 s |
88.8 s |
+4.2 s |
95.48% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
6th |
28 Points |
45 Points |
-17 Points |
62.22% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
94.2 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-8.2 Km/H |
91.99% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
13th |
400 |
230 |
+170 |
57.5% |
| Rolling Resistance |
15th |
8.52 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+2.19 kg / t |
74.3% |
Good dry grip.
Long wet braking distances and average wet handling.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
37.1 M |
35.1 M |
+2 M |
94.61% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
74 s |
73.8 s |
+0.2 s |
99.73% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
2nd |
28 Points |
30 Points |
-2 Points |
93.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
11th |
64.4 M |
57.3 M |
+7.1 M |
88.98% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
95.4 s |
88.8 s |
+6.6 s |
93.08% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
10th |
19 Points |
45 Points |
-26 Points |
42.22% |
| Straight Aqua |
12th |
89 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-13.4 Km/H |
86.91% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
10th |
360 |
230 |
+130 |
63.89% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
8.09 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+1.76 kg / t |
78.24% |
Good dry traction, low noise.
Slow steering response in the dry, poor wet grip.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
37.3 M |
35.1 M |
+2.2 M |
94.1% |
| Dry Handling |
14th |
75.2 s |
73.8 s |
+1.4 s |
98.14% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
14th |
17 Points |
30 Points |
-13 Points |
56.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
60.5 M |
57.3 M |
+3.2 M |
94.71% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
94.3 s |
88.8 s |
+5.5 s |
94.17% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
8th |
22 Points |
45 Points |
-23 Points |
48.89% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
90.9 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-11.5 Km/H |
88.77% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
1st |
70 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
9th |
350 |
230 |
+120 |
65.71% |
| Rolling Resistance |
12th |
8.1 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+1.77 kg / t |
78.15% |
Precise steering in the wet, good slalom performance and good dry handling.
Long wet braking distances.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
18th |
38.1 M |
35.1 M |
+3 M |
92.13% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
74.3 s |
73.8 s |
+0.5 s |
99.33% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
8th |
24 Points |
30 Points |
-6 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
12th |
64.9 M |
57.3 M |
+7.6 M |
88.29% |
| Wet Handling |
14th |
97.1 s |
88.8 s |
+8.3 s |
91.45% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
13th |
13 Points |
45 Points |
-32 Points |
28.89% |
| Straight Aqua |
16th |
88.3 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-14.1 Km/H |
86.23% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
16th |
420 |
230 |
+190 |
54.76% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
7.27 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+0.94 kg / t |
87.07% |
Good dry handling.
Understeer in the wet, average aquaplaning resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
36.5 M |
35.1 M |
+1.4 M |
96.16% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
74.3 s |
73.8 s |
+0.5 s |
99.33% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
6th |
25 Points |
30 Points |
-5 Points |
83.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
64 M |
57.3 M |
+6.7 M |
89.53% |
| Wet Handling |
16th |
97.7 s |
88.8 s |
+8.9 s |
90.89% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
15th |
12 Points |
45 Points |
-33 Points |
26.67% |
| Straight Aqua |
20th |
87.2 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-15.2 Km/H |
85.16% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
13th |
400 |
230 |
+170 |
57.5% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
8.08 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+1.75 kg / t |
78.34% |
Very low rolling resistance, good ride comfort.
Long wet braking distances, poor lateral stability in the wet, low aquaplaning resistance, slow steering.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
15th |
37.8 M |
35.1 M |
+2.7 M |
92.86% |
| Dry Handling |
14th |
75.2 s |
73.8 s |
+1.4 s |
98.14% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
14th |
17 Points |
30 Points |
-13 Points |
56.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
16th |
65.5 M |
57.3 M |
+8.2 M |
87.48% |
| Wet Handling |
13th |
96.9 s |
88.8 s |
+8.1 s |
91.64% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
13th |
13 Points |
45 Points |
-32 Points |
28.89% |
| Straight Aqua |
17th |
88.2 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-14.2 Km/H |
86.13% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
8 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
17th |
440 |
230 |
+210 |
52.27% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
6.33 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Short wet braking.
Weak traction and lateral stability in the wet, poor balance in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
36.4 M |
35.1 M |
+1.3 M |
96.43% |
| Dry Handling |
19th |
75.9 s |
73.8 s |
+2.1 s |
97.23% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
19th |
9 Points |
30 Points |
-21 Points |
30% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
58.9 M |
57.3 M |
+1.6 M |
97.28% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
95.9 s |
88.8 s |
+7.1 s |
92.6% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
11th |
17 Points |
45 Points |
-28 Points |
37.78% |
| Straight Aqua |
15th |
88.7 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-13.7 Km/H |
86.62% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
13th |
6 Points |
8 Points |
-2 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
250 |
230 |
+20 |
92% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
7.84 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+1.51 kg / t |
80.74% |
Acceptable dry handling.
Nervous handling in the wet, high noise level.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
15th |
37.8 M |
35.1 M |
+2.7 M |
92.86% |
| Dry Handling |
11th |
74.8 s |
73.8 s |
+1 s |
98.66% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
11th |
21 Points |
30 Points |
-9 Points |
70% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
15th |
65.4 M |
57.3 M |
+8.1 M |
87.61% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
95.9 s |
88.8 s |
+7.1 s |
92.6% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
12th |
16 Points |
45 Points |
-29 Points |
35.56% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
89.1 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-13.3 Km/H |
87.01% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
13th |
6 Points |
8 Points |
-2 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
240 |
230 |
+10 |
95.83% |
| Rolling Resistance |
17th |
8.61 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+2.28 kg / t |
73.52% |
Acceptable dry handling.
Long wet braking and generally poor wet grip.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
37.6 M |
35.1 M |
+2.5 M |
93.35% |
| Dry Handling |
10th |
74.6 s |
73.8 s |
+0.8 s |
98.93% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
10th |
22 Points |
30 Points |
-8 Points |
73.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
13th |
65 M |
57.3 M |
+7.7 M |
88.15% |
| Wet Handling |
18th |
97.9 s |
88.8 s |
+9.1 s |
90.7% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
17th |
11 Points |
45 Points |
-34 Points |
24.44% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
93.1 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-9.3 Km/H |
90.92% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
13th |
6 Points |
8 Points |
-2 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
6th |
280 |
230 |
+50 |
82.14% |
| Rolling Resistance |
18th |
8.65 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+2.32 kg / t |
73.18% |
Good dry handling.
Long wet braking and generally poor wet grip.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
15th |
37.8 M |
35.1 M |
+2.7 M |
92.86% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
74.2 s |
73.8 s |
+0.4 s |
99.46% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
6th |
25 Points |
30 Points |
-5 Points |
83.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
19th |
68.8 M |
57.3 M |
+11.5 M |
83.28% |
| Wet Handling |
19th |
98.4 s |
88.8 s |
+9.6 s |
90.24% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
19th |
9 Points |
45 Points |
-36 Points |
20% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
93.8 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-8.6 Km/H |
91.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
13th |
6 Points |
8 Points |
-2 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
240 |
230 |
+10 |
95.83% |
| Rolling Resistance |
13th |
8.34 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+2.01 kg / t |
75.9% |
None mentioned.
Long wet braking, slow steering, low wet safety. Understeer in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
14th |
37.7 M |
35.1 M |
+2.6 M |
93.1% |
| Dry Handling |
13th |
75.1 s |
73.8 s |
+1.3 s |
98.27% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
13th |
18 Points |
30 Points |
-12 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
13th |
65 M |
57.3 M |
+7.7 M |
88.15% |
| Wet Handling |
17th |
97.8 s |
88.8 s |
+9 s |
90.8% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
17th |
11 Points |
45 Points |
-34 Points |
24.44% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
89.7 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-12.7 Km/H |
87.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
13th |
6 Points |
8 Points |
-2 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
1st |
230 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
19th |
8.97 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+2.64 kg / t |
70.57% |
None mentioned.
Very long braking, poor traction, and slow steering in the wet. Very high rolling resistance. Oversteer in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
12th |
37.4 M |
35.1 M |
+2.3 M |
93.85% |
| Dry Handling |
20th |
76.1 s |
73.8 s |
+2.3 s |
96.98% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
20th |
8 Points |
30 Points |
-22 Points |
26.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
20th |
69.4 M |
57.3 M |
+12.1 M |
82.56% |
| Wet Handling |
15th |
97.6 s |
88.8 s |
+8.8 s |
90.98% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
15th |
12 Points |
45 Points |
-33 Points |
26.67% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
91.5 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-10.9 Km/H |
89.36% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
13th |
6 Points |
8 Points |
-2 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
11th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
6th |
280 |
230 |
+50 |
82.14% |
| Rolling Resistance |
20th |
9.08 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+2.75 kg / t |
69.71% |
None mentioned.
Long braking distances and poor lateral stability in the wet (safety issue), long dry braking, unstable rear during dry handling.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
18th |
38.1 M |
35.1 M |
+3 M |
92.13% |
| Dry Handling |
17th |
75.5 s |
73.8 s |
+1.7 s |
97.75% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
17th |
15 Points |
30 Points |
-15 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
18th |
68.1 M |
57.3 M |
+10.8 M |
84.14% |
| Wet Handling |
20th |
102.3 s |
88.8 s |
+13.5 s |
86.8% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
20th |
4 Points |
45 Points |
-41 Points |
8.89% |
| Straight Aqua |
19th |
88 Km/H |
102.4 Km/H |
-14.4 Km/H |
85.94% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
13th |
6 Points |
8 Points |
-2 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
240 |
230 |
+10 |
95.83% |
| Rolling Resistance |
14th |
8.37 kg / t |
6.33 kg / t |
+2.04 kg / t |
75.63% |
I read that from 8th week of 2020 there is a new version of CPC6 with better wet handling, dry braking and lower rolling resistance. Any official news about that?
Nothing official, but tyre companies rarely announce mid-life updates sadly!
Please insert your source, ideally with link, thnks.
It's the same test published in russian media colesa.ru
I am not sure if they took the info from the original publication I Auto Zeitung because I don't have full access to the test itself. Maybe someone could have a look. The info was published in the result section just bellow the description of CPC6 test results and verdict.
Another test by German magazine Auto Motor und Sport and yet again info that the CPC6 was recently updated.
https://www.auto-motor-und-...
just to add to the conversation, the pirelli p7 blue new batch was expected to be distributed in March, unsure about any update there.
I have heard of this P7 Blue 2 (to be called P7 Blue again, classic Pirelli) but I've had nothing official.