Menu
Apollo Aspire XP View Gallery (1)
205-275/35-65 R16-19 98 sizes 2017

Apollo Aspire XP

The new Aspire XP summer tyre ensures an outstanding driving experience for cars and SUV's on both dry and wet roads. Safety and comfort were given an absolute priority during the research and development phase. An improved silica tread compound enhances handling on wet roads by 22% compared to the Aspire XP's predecessors, while braking distance in wet road conditions has been improved by 7%.

8.1
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
78%
Wet Grip
76%
Road Feedback
74%
Handling
75%
Wear
74%
Comfort
71%
Buy again
76%
8 Reviews
75% Average
34,300 miles driven
8 Tests (avg: 9th)
Apollo Aspire XP

Apollo Aspire XP

Summer Economy
BETA
8.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
85.9
0.32x / 6 tests
Value
76.9
0.42x / 13 tests
Wet
73
2x / 17 tests
Dry
63.7
1.8x / 12 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
70.2
14 tests
Handling
67.3
10 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 8
Publications: 4
Period: 2019 - 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 8
Avg Rating: 74.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.33
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 5/20 10 metrics
2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2020 225/50 R17 10/20 11 metrics
2020 ACE Mid Range Summer Tyre Test ACE 2020 215/55 R17 4/9 0 metrics
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 9/49 2 metrics
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 10/20 11 metrics
2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tyre Test Gute Fahrt 2019 225/40 R18 9/12 4 metrics
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 14/45 2 metrics
2019 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2019 235/45 R18 8/10 8 metrics
8
Tests
9th
Average
4th
Best
14th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
10th/20
Good dry traction, low noise.
Slow steering response in the dry, poor wet grip.
9th/49
5th/20
Good handling, short braking distances, low wear, good price / wear ratio.
None mentioned.
Exemplary.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
205/50 R 17 93 W XL D B 71
205/50 R 17 93 W XL D B 71
215/45 R 17 91 Y XL D B 71
215/45 R 17 91 Y XL D B 71
215/55 R 17 94 Y C B 71
215/55 R 17 94 Y C B 71
225/50 R 17 98 Y XL C B 71
225/50 R 17 98 Y XL C B 71
225/60 R 17 99 V C B 71
225/60 R 17 99 V C B 71
235/65 R 17 108 V XL B B 71
235/65 R 17 108 V XL B B 71
225/45 R 17 94 Y XL C B 71
225/45 R 17 94 Y XL C B 71
18 inch
225/40 R 18 92 Y XL C B 71
225/40 R 18 92 Y XL C B 71
235/60 R 18 107 W XL B B 71
235/60 R 18 107 W XL B B 71
245/40 R 18 97 Y XL C B 71
245/40 R 18 97 Y XL C B 71
245/45 R 18 100 Y XL C B 71
245/45 R 18 100 Y XL C B 71
255/35 R 18 94 Y XL D B 71
255/35 R 18 94 Y XL D B 71
19 inch
235/35 R 19 91 Y XL D B 71
235/35 R 19 91 Y XL D B 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Apollo Aspire XP >>

Questions and Answers for the Apollo Aspire XP

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Apollo Aspire XP. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Apollo Aspire XP Reviews

Given 76% while driving a Toyota Auris (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 25,000 average miles
Originally fitted in December 2020, made as DOT 2520, now covered a reasonable mileage on first the front and now on rear, 24,900 miles in GB on mixture of UK roads, which are now very rough with many defects and potholes since we ran out out of money, about the Apollo's, no complaints, wear rate is very good and still 5.8mm average left of original 7.5mm of new tread (hope to get 40k+ out of them?). Comfortable and not too noisy that I can tell. Sure footed in the wet but I never push it in those conditions. Good dry grip. Looked to buy two more in 2022 could not find anywhere. Maybe no longer available in UK or replaced by other models of tyre at this size. Copes well with this 'heavy' electric Hybrid chassis. Fitted Khumo Ecsta's to front and they are a much softer compound that wears twice as fast as these Apollo's.
December 19, 2024
Given 70% while driving a Toyota Auris (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 100 easy going miles
Additionally, these two Apollo Aspire 225/45 R17 91 Y XL’s came with 7.5 mm of brand new tread when fitted in December 2020. and with EU ratings of C, A and 70db I am hopeful that I will get good wear out of these according to the 2020 Auto Bild Tyre test summer tyres to which I mostly referred. They seem comfortable, quiet and hold road well but I don’t usually drive aggressively / spirited. Not tested in the very wet conditions yet but my regular round trip to the coast of 360 Uk miles is looming so I will get better insight then subject to Tier restrictions. Tread comprising 4 equal spaces and sized main grooves. Somewhat disappointed that these have no rim protection (RP) to save my alloys from minor scuffs but will just have to be extra careful. The Black Circles site had no info on RP or similar descriptive code but this info is available on tyre-shopper and etyres but Apollo is not one of their stocked brands. ( Other online tyre sales sites are available) . Had a good deal on BC including fitting at same price as delivery only on many lesser rated brands. Of course price is not main determinant, safety is and as long as I have good quality testing regime like Auto-Bild and tyrereviews to compare to, I have done my due diligence. Will report back after a year / 5000 miles. These replaced Old, hard and increasingly age degraded Michelin Primacy 4,s with 61k miles under them which were down to 3-4 mm remaining.
December 20, 2020
Given 70% while driving a Toyota (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 100 easy going miles
Bought these for front axle after studying the reviews and so far am not disappointed but frankly with COV19 not driven far so will reserve judgement until after a year of use. Original fitment was 215/45 R17 87W so upped the profile to this alternative for car model listed by Toyota for our 2010 Auris Hybrid as 215/45’s were noisy, harsh and felt every road defect. Old Michelin Primacy were reason for this. Were much cheaper than lesser rated tyres. Feel Grippy, Quiet and sure footed so far but I’m no expert. Wear will tell in a year. Made by Apollo Vredenstein at their Hungary factory, Treadwear 280,Traction AA, Temp A, XL version 670kg load max at 51psi max. No Rim Protection what so ever. At car standard inflation of 33psi seem to have a soft sidewall so will up pressures in time to see if ride is effected. Maybe due to a single polyester ply. Very pleased so far and rear tyres will follow suit with profile change soon.
December 19, 2020

How would you rate the Apollo Aspire XP?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Apollo Aspire XP Reviews

Given 70% while driving a Toyota Auris (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 100 easy going miles
Additionally, these two Apollo Aspire 225/45 R17 91 Y XL’s came with 7.5 mm of brand new tread when fitted in December 2020. and with EU ratings of C, A and 70db I am hopeful that I will get good wear out of these according to the 2020 Auto Bild Tyre test summer tyres to which I mostly referred. They seem comfortable, quiet and hold road well but I don’t usually drive aggressively / spirited. Not tested in the very wet conditions yet but my regular round trip to the coast of 360 Uk miles is looming so I will get better insight then subject to Tier restrictions. Tread comprising 4 equal spaces and sized main grooves. Somewhat disappointed that these have no rim protection (RP) to save my alloys from minor scuffs but will just have to be extra careful. The Black Circles site had no info on RP or similar descriptive code but this info is available on tyre-shopper and etyres but Apollo is not one of their stocked brands. ( Other online tyre sales sites are available) . Had a good deal on BC including fitting at same price as delivery only on many lesser rated brands. Of course price is not main determinant, safety is and as long as I have good quality testing regime like Auto-Bild and tyrereviews to compare to, I have done my due diligence. Will report back after a year / 5000 miles. These replaced Old, hard and increasingly age degraded Michelin Primacy 4,s with 61k miles under them which were down to 3-4 mm remaining.
December 20, 2020
Given 77% while driving a Ford Focus MK3 (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 6,000 average miles
After 8000 kms the situation is as follows: Comparing to previous OEM tyre: Conti PremiumContact 2, H rating Pros: - more comfortable, softer sidewall - more economical - noise went missing in action Cons: - much more weaker sidewall although it's an XL, tyre therefore spirited cornering is an issue. For normal driving, commuting, on not so good and bad roads is perfect. In the matter of dry/wet grip there is no difference between the last tyre.
April 17, 2020
Given 85% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (235/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
After running the premium tyres for the last two years eagle f1s and Michelen ps4s I thought I'd try something a little more cost effective as doing 410 miles a week and 22 roundabouts a day its hard not to push on a little bit where you can. So far I've been impressed with these tyres so far wet and dry traction have been good no issues with braking or even when there has been alot of standing water in the road If they get decent milage by the end of the life of the tyre I go for another set. they was £30-35 a corner cheaper at the time ordered through black circles than the normal tyre I would choice ps4 I'm sure I've read they are a sub brand of verdastein which are a decent German brand if tyres. If I could be nit picking at a negative not that I've really found any the response of the tyre if your chucking it left to right is slightly slower than the Eagle f1 but that's only if your absolutely on it and the other seems to be availability seems to be a little sparse when I was tyre shopping. These are decent value for money
March 9, 2020
Given 64% while driving a Vauxhall insignia elite ecoflex 160 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Running 245/45/18 at 40psi
I have tested these in the dry only,
They handle well in the dry did good in emergency stop on motorway.
Handled well on country roads hitting corners at 40mph no slip or sliding.
In my option these are good if you driving in the city good grip good mpg. But if your doing motorway miles a lot I would avoid they handle well up-to 74mph but soon as you go over 80mph you get a lot of feed back from the road including vibration and steering shaking and lot of noise .
August 24, 2019
Given 86% while driving a BMW 530D M sport (245/45 R18 W) on mostly motorways for 1,000 average miles
I bought these for my bmw 530d for the front.
i used to have Hankook ventus s12 evo2 and then goodyear f1 as 3 which lasted a good 43k miles and were very good tyres, low noise, comfortable so i was hesitant to try a make i have never heard of before.

These tyres feel fantastic. they are pretty much the same ratings as the goodyear, they handle very good, they are a soft tyre which suits my car but handles me throwing it around without any issue or squeal.

the tread is nice and deep which inspires confidence.

If you are not sure if you should try these tyres, i highly recommend them.

(all that being said, i do have a vibration on my car but it done it with previous tyres also even after a road force balance.)
July 26, 2019
Rate the Apollo Aspire XP