Menu
Rotalla RU01 S Pace View Gallery (1)
165-285/30-55 R15-20 127 sizes 2015
Tested by Tyre Reviews View Test »

Rotalla RU01 S Pace

Rotalla Tyres Ultra High Performance Summer

The Rotalla RU01 S Pace is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

4.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
81%
Wet Grip
70%
Road Feedback
68%
Handling
69%
Wear
69%
Comfort
76%
Buy again
60%
27 Reviews
71% Average
168,210 miles driven
7 Tests (avg: 26th)
Rotalla RU01 S Pace

Rotalla RU01 S Pace

Summer Budget
BETA
4.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Value
64.2
0.38x / 4 tests
Comfort
64
0.29x / 4 tests
Wet
54.8
2x / 13 tests
Dry
54
1.8x / 11 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
53.2
12 tests
Handling
52.7
10 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 7
Publications: 5
Period: 2017 - 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 27
Avg Rating: 70.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.14
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 45/48 2 metrics
2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2022 225/45 R17 9/9 10 metrics
2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 48/44 2 metrics
2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2020 225/50 R17 16/20 11 metrics
2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2020 225/40 R18 16/16 1 metrics
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 39/49 2 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2017 235/35 R19 9/9 4 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
7
Tests
26th
Average
9th
Best
48th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview
225/45 R18 • 2023
45th/48
2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test
225/45 R17 • 2022
9th/9
Good aquaplaning resistance, low noise, good levels of comfort.
Undynamic handling in the dry and wet, long dry braking, extremely long wet braking, high rolling resistance.
The Rotalla S Race SU02 might be a quiet comfortable tyre, but with long braking distances in the dry and wet, and soft imprecise handling, this is one we'd avoid.
2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview
215/55 R17 • 2022
48th/44

Questions and Answers for the Rotalla RU01 S Pace

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Rotalla RU01 S Pace. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

YouTube Review

Review Summary

Based on 25 user reviews

Most drivers found the Rotalla RU01 S Pace to be a strong budget choice, praising good dry grip, acceptable wet performance for normal driving, low noise, comfort, and value. Higher-scoring reviews frequently report stable highway manners and surprisingly good wet confidence, with some noting decent tread life. However, a notable minority cite serious quality and safety concerns: reports of out-of-round tyres, delamination/bubbles, and unpredictable wet grip at the limit, plus soft sidewalls causing instability. Overall sentiment is moderately positive, but potential QC issues and wet-limit performance are recurring cautions.

Strengths
  • Good value for money
  • Low noise
  • Comfortable ride
  • Good dry grip
  • Adequate wet grip for normal driving
  • Stable/highway manners for daily use
Areas for Improvement
  • Quality control issues (out-of-round
  • Bubbles/delamination)
  • Unpredictable wet grip at the limit
  • Soft sidewalls/instability at higher speeds

Top 3 Rotalla RU01 S Pace Reviews

Given 33% while driving a Skoda Fabia vRS (205/45 R16) on mostly town for 0 average miles
I bourght a car with these tyres on they look good but road noise uncomfortable do not buy pay the extra if you can I’m going change these even though plenty of meat on them hope this helps .
Ask a question | Helpful 682
April 3, 2025
Given 61% while driving a BMW 5 Series M Sport ( E60 ) (275/30 R19) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
I drove the tires for 3 summer seasons. The first two seasons the tires held up excellently, considering their price class. Good braking in the dry, ok braking in the wet, as I have always approached cautiously considering that in really heavy rain I felt the car a little unstable. The mileage was about 30,000 km and in the third year they still had grip, they were soft but they twisted. The whole car started to bounce. The tires were stored properly while they were on the rims. For their price class I think they are ok but because of the twisting especially of the large sizes it is a deal breaker for me.
Ask a question | Helpful 183
October 28, 2025
Given 81% while driving a Suzuki vitara s 1,4 boosterjet (225/45 R19) on mostly town for 8,000 average miles
Fitted these tyres as a +2 size upgrade on my Suzuki Vitara, from 215/55-R17 to 225/45-R19. I have driven them for about 8000km. I honestly am quite surprised with these tyres. Never expected much from a Chinese brand-made tyre, but it holds well. During the heavy downpours, the tyres are predictable, even when traveling north of 90kph. During that time, naturally I drove past puddles. These tyres cut any standing waters with no major drama. The aqua planning was also manageable, never had a skid, no issues at all. In the dry weather, the tyres are behaving like any normal touring tyres. The steering is quite precise, no jitters on high speed (about 110-120kph) and definitely it drives smoothly throughout. Like others mentioned, the tyres are relatively quiet. Despite the wider track and larger in size, -dare I say the noise is comparable with Yokohama RV02 (the tyres I replaced)? Though I have driven them for 8000km+, these tyres still look brand new. We’ll see how long these tyres will last. All in all, I am happily surprised with them. Makes you wonder why would you want to pay double of what I paid for on these tyres for major brands.
Ask a question | Helpful 857
June 27, 2022
Have you driven on the Rotalla RU01 S Pace tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Rotalla RU01 S Pace? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Rotalla RU01 S Pace >

Latest Rotalla RU01 S Pace Reviews

Given 40% while driving a BMW 330CD (255/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Whoever loves themselves and their passengers will not fit this tyre. In the dry, OK, but as soon as the roads get wet, either drive really carefully or just stay home. I bought a set of wheels with these tyres preinstalled and figured they would be okay for a month until I have to fit the winter tyres. Boy was I wrong. Extremely unpredictable in the wet, every turn was a journey by itself. All in all, do not recommend, spend a bit more money on a better tyre.
Ask a question | Helpful 740
November 4, 2022
Given 60% while driving a BMW 530D (245/40 R19) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
These tyres would be good if correctly manufactured but what a NIGHTMARE. Out of 6 tyres, 2 of them were not perfectly round and the cars would wobble (especially in front). I had to throw them away and buy other tyres. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT BRAND NEW TYRES. NEVER AGAIN!
Ask a question | Helpful 816
July 20, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 83% while driving a Honda 1.8 VTi (215/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 10,000 average miles
I been using this tire here in UAE. Its cheap and it performed well.
Ask a question | Helpful 780
February 5, 2022
Given 69% while driving a BMW 325d M Sport (265/30 R19) on mostly motorways for 30,000 easy going miles
They perform great, the price is great. I have had 2 full sets of these tyres now, my biggest issue? I have had 2 of these tyres delaminate! Both on rear tyres and over a year apart, 1 formed a huge bubble in the side wall and the side wall would deform dangerously under cornering, and 1 delaminated on the inner shoulder of the tyre exposing cords and steel belt, the overall wear on that tyre would never have suggested there was an issue. I really liked these tyres, for years. But with these incidents I cannot justify buying them anymore
Ask a question | Helpful 826
January 12, 2022
Given 66% while driving a Alfa Romeo Brera TBi (245/35 R19) on mostly country roads for 20,000 spirited miles
These tires are good on dry ground no problem even if there is better but the real problem is on wet ground so there is no one left! Dangerous I often slipped under braking and lost control, it's a bit scary! And when accelerating, it's the same, the wheel slips on the first 3 gears. Unless you drive quietly they may not scare you, but in fast situations or emergency braking they are catastrophic. I will not repurchase this model.
Ask a question | Helpful 917
July 7, 2021
Given 70% while driving a SEAT Ibiza 1.0 TSI 115 (/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,300 spirited miles
Have done about 2000 KM on these tyres so far in warm weather on both dry and wet roads. Both dry and wet grip is good, but not fantastic. Definitely sufficient for a daily driver. When pushed hard, there is some understeer and the relatively soft sidewalls are apparent. This tyre claims to be UHP but in reality, feels more comfort biased than other UHP tyres like the Goodyear F1A5. Overall, I'm not disappointed with them, especially considering the low price. In fact, they have performed surprisingly close to the Michelin Primacy 4 that were fitted previously on my car. I probably would not buy them again as other UHP tyres do feel sportier but anyone looking for balanced, quiet tyres should defnitely give these a try.
Ask a question | Helpful 846
July 3, 2021
Given 85% while driving a Volvo C30 R Design Sport (205/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Very impressed, hold the road in both wet and dry conditions, noise levels very low and the ride has improved much more comfortable. The steering feels a touch lighter with these meaning the feedback is a touch less and its to early to say about wear. I have not tried a hard stop and hope I won't have to but overall I'm very happy with these tyres and would buy again.
Ask a question | Helpful 850
December 24, 2019
Given 85% while driving a Volvo C30 R Design Sport (205/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Very impressed, hold the road in both wet and dry conditions, noise levels very low and the ride has improved much more comfortable. The steering feels a touch lighter with these meaning the feedback is a touch less and its to early to say about wear. I have not tried a hard stop and hope I won't have to but overall I'm very happy with these tyres and would buy again.
Ask a question | Helpful 909
December 24, 2019
Given 83% while driving a Audi A3 (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I had these tires for 2 seasons and the tread is somewhat good. I will drive for a 3 season and replace them. I find that they are very good tires and I would buy again.
Ask a question | Helpful 775
October 6, 2019
Given 100% while driving a Honda Vezel 1.5 Hybrid RU3 (215/55 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Im lucky to have bought these tyres for my Honda Vezel RU3 2015;

Overall these tyre are competitively priced as compared to the Dunlops (factory fitted), these tyres are silent and much softer than the stock dunlops, very light on the vehicle, im enjoying the drive.

The grip factor is very nice, being a summer performance tyre, the UTQG rating is; Treadwear 320, Traction A, Temperature A with speed rating upto 270kmph, therefore driving on piping hot tarmac at 129kmph the car never felt sluggish around the curves.

I have so far driven these tyres inter city, locally and driven up the north hills aswell, so after after driving 15000kms+ the tyres are still as brand new as the day one. I keep them rotated every 10000kms with air pressure 33psi.

I'll admit these are much in my budget and user friendly tyres. Would definitely buy them again.
Ask a question | Helpful 875
August 27, 2019
Given 80% while driving a SEAT Leon Cupra R 225 (225/40 R18 V) on a combination of roads for 100 average miles
Ok firstly i only do around 3000 miles pa.
so i did not want to buy expensive tyres, if i was loaded then i would have got th Uniroyal rainsport 3.
I am very happy with these, I have a 225bhp car, so it can be very quick.
Very happy with the feel and control of these.
Chuffed as, plus I got 4 for £150 delivered. fantastic
Ask a question | Helpful 995
August 26, 2019
Given 81% while driving a Hyundai ix35 (245/45 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 10 average miles
For the money great value. I wouldn't buy them if you were a high mileage person. I can judge that my set will require replacing before 20k. Giving me 3 years.
Ask a question | Helpful 916
August 10, 2019