2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test

In their latest tyre test, Motor magazine has taken a unique approach to evaluating summer tyres, focusing on models that combine energy efficiency with high performance. The test specifically targeted tyres with the lowest rolling resistance ratings, examining whether fuel-saving characteristics would compromise grip and safety features.

The testing team selected seven tyres in the popular 205/55 R16 size, a dimension commonly found on vehicles ranging from the Audi A3 to the Volvo V70. Six of the tested models carried the EU label's top "A" rating for both rolling resistance and wet grip, while the seventh tyre (Prinx XLAB Comfort EV) featured an "A" rating for rolling resistance but a "B" for wet grip.

Unfortunately the magazine didn't share that only the Continental and Prinx tyres are aftermarket tyres, the rest in AA EU label scores are OE tuned.  Falken and Bridgestone are Audi, Michelin is a Peugeot tyre, Nexen is Renault, and the Goodyear was unmarked, but most likely VW as usually in replacement it is unmarked. We do not know exactly how tuned these tyres are, but we can expect they have traded some wet grip for rolling resistance in the process.

The results revealed a tight competition among most contenders, with the Continental UltraContact NXT emerging as the overall winner, demonstrating the best balance of wet and dry performance. The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Michelin e.Primacy secured second and third places respectively, with Michelin particularly impressing with its outstanding rolling resistance results.

Perhaps most surprising was how mid-range tyres like the Falken Ziex ZE310 Ecorun matched premium models in many performance aspects, finishing tied for fourth place with the Bridgestone Turanza T005. Only the Chinese-made Prinx XLAB Comfort EV significantly underperformed, showing particularly concerning results in wet conditions despite its premium-level pricing.

Dry

The Michelin e.Primacy leads the dry braking test with a stopping distance of just 36.1 meters from 100 km/h, closely followed by the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun at 36.3 meters. Continental's UltraContact NXT places third, showing good all-round capabilities. The Chinese Prinx XLAB Comfort EV struggles significantly, requiring 39.5 meters - over 3 meters more than the best performers.

Continental takes the top spot in the dry handling test with a lap time of 52.5 seconds, demonstrating its balanced performance characteristics. Goodyear's EfficientGrip Performance 2 follows closely at 52.8 seconds, with Falken maintaining its strong dry performance in third. Despite its excellent dry braking, the Michelin e.Primacy falls to sixth place here, suggesting a less sporty handling character.

Test drivers rated the Continental UltraContact NXT highest for subjective handling feel, scoring 7.1 points. Bridgestone's Turanza T005 impresses with second place (6.9 points) despite middling results in objective tests. The Nexen N Blue S rates lowest at 5.7 points, indicating less precise steering response and driver confidence compared to its competitors.

Wet

Continental dominates wet braking with a stopping distance of 50.2 meters, followed by Goodyear (51.1m) and Michelin (51.7m). This continues Continental's strong showing across both dry and wet disciplines. The Prinx tyre presents a serious safety concern with a dramatically longer stopping distance of 68.7 meters - nearly 18.5 meters (37%) more than the Continental.

Continental maintains its wet performance lead with the quickest lap time of 84.6 seconds, with Goodyear and Michelin following in the same order as the wet braking test. This consistent performance across wet tests demonstrates these premium brands' well-rounded wet-weather engineering. Again, the Prinx tyre lags significantly behind with a time of 94 seconds.

Nexen N Blue S surprisingly excels in straight-line aquaplaning resistance with a float speed of 76.7 km/h, significantly outperforming tyres that lead in other wet categories. Bridgestone places second (74.5 km/h), showing good water evacuation capabilities. Despite their strong performance in other wet tests, both Michelin and Prinx struggle with the lowest float speeds of 71.5 and 71.1 km/h respectively.

Bridgestone Turanza T005 dominates curved aquaplaning resistance with 2.98 m/sec² of remaining lateral acceleration, followed closely by Nexen at 2.89 m/sec². These results align with their strong straight aquaplaning performance. Michelin shows its weakest result here at 2.28 m/sec² - significantly behind the competition and reinforcing its weakness in water evacuation tests.

Comfort

Continental, Goodyear, and Michelin tie for first place with 7.0 points each, showing that low rolling resistance doesn't necessarily compromise ride comfort. The remaining tyres score reasonably well, with only the Prinx noticeably behind at 6.0 points.

Goodyear produces the lowest external noise at 63.4 dB, with Continental and Michelin following closely. Bridgestone measures noticeably louder at 66.8 dB, a full 3.4 dB above the quietest tyre. Interestingly, the budget Prinx tyre performs relatively well in this test, placing fourth with 64.1 dB, one of its few stronger showings.

Value

Michelin e.Primacy demonstrates its efficiency focus with the lowest rolling resistance coefficient of 5.48 kg/t, followed closely by Goodyear at 5.61 kg/t. Despite winning multiple performance categories, Continental places sixth at 6.58 kg/t, suggesting its optimisation focused more on grip than efficiency. The Prinx tyre shows the worst efficiency at 6.81 kg/t, contradicting its "Comfort EV" naming which implies energy efficiency.

Results

1^st

Continental UltraContact NXT

205/55 R16

• EU Label: A/A/
• Origin: Portugal
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 479.00

The Continental UltraContact NXT emerges as the overall winner, demonstrating exceptional balance across nearly all testing criteria. It dominates wet performance categories with best-in-class wet braking, handling, and circle grip while maintaining strong dry performance credentials. The Continental excels in subjective handling assessments, earning top marks from test drivers for both precision and comfort. Its only notable weakness appears in rolling resistance, where it ranks sixth, suggesting Continental prioritized grip and handling characteristics over maximum efficiency. Despite this trade-off and its premium price point (€479), the UltraContact NXT justifies its position as the test winner through consistently high performance across safety-critical categories.

Dry

99.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	3rd	36.6 M	36.1 M	+0.5 M	98.63%
Dry Handling	1st	52.5 s			100%
Subj. Dry Handling	1st	7.1 Points			100%

Wet

97.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	1st	50.2 M			100%
Wet Handling	1st	84.6 s			100%
Wet Circle	1st	0.841 m/s			100%
Straight Aqua	4th	74.1 Km/H	76.7 Km/H	-2.6 Km/H	96.61%
Curved Aquaplaning	4th	2.75 m/sec2	2.98 m/sec2	-0.23 m/sec2	92.28%

Comfort

99.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	7 Points			100%
Noise	2nd	63.8 dB	63.4 dB	+0.4 dB	99.37%

Value

83.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	6th	6.58 kg / t	5.48 kg / t	+1.1 kg / t	83.28%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

2^nd

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

205/55 R16

• EU Label: A/A/
• Origin: Poland
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 436.00

The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 secures a strong second-place finish with well-balanced performance across all test categories. It follows closely behind Continental in wet performance while delivering excellent efficiency with the second-lowest rolling resistance rating. The Goodyear shines particularly in comfort metrics, achieving the lowest external noise levels (63.4 dB) and tied for top comfort scores. It demonstrates solid dry handling capabilities with a second-place finish in the dry handling test (52.8 seconds). While not leading in any individual performance category except noise, the Goodyear impresses with its consistent high-level performance and well-rounded character, offering an excellent balance between safety, comfort, and efficiency at a slightly lower price point (€436) than the Continental.

Dry

96.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	4th	37.1 M	36.1 M	+1 M	97.3%
Dry Handling	2nd	52.8 s	52.5 s	+0.3 s	99.43%
Subj. Dry Handling	4th	6.5 Points	7.1 Points	-0.6 Points	91.55%

Wet

97.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	2nd	51.1 M	50.2 M	+0.9 M	98.24%
Wet Handling	2nd	85 s	84.6 s	+0.4 s	99.53%
Wet Circle	2nd	0.84 m/s	0.841 m/s	-0 m/s	99.88%
Straight Aqua	5th	73.7 Km/H	76.7 Km/H	-3 Km/H	96.09%
Curved Aquaplaning	3rd	2.77 m/sec2	2.98 m/sec2	-0.21 m/sec2	92.95%

Comfort

100%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	7 Points			100%
Noise	1st	63.4 dB			100%

Value

97.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	2nd	5.61 kg / t	5.48 kg / t	+0.13 kg / t	97.68%

Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £94.99 Results Table Test Charts

3^rd

Michelin e.Primacy

205/55 R16

• EU Label: A/A/
• Origin: Germany
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 415.00

The Michelin e.Primacy showcases its efficiency-focused design by delivering the best rolling resistance coefficient (5.48 kg/t) while still maintaining strong overall performance. It excels in dry braking with a class-leading 36.1 meters stopping distance and delivers good wet braking performance. The e.Primacy's comfort credentials are equally impressive, tying for first in subjective comfort assessment. However, Michelin shows some weakness in water evacuation tests, placing last in curved aquaplaning and near-last in straight aquaplaning resistance. This suggests a trade-off where rolling resistance improvements may have compromised water dispersion capabilities. Despite these limitations, the Michelin's balance of efficiency, comfort, and core safety performance at a competitive price point (€415) earns it third place overall.

Dry

95.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	1st	36.1 M			100%
Dry Handling	6th	53.4 s	52.5 s	+0.9 s	98.31%
Subj. Dry Handling	5th	6.3 Points	7.1 Points	-0.8 Points	88.73%

Wet

92.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	3rd	51.7 M	50.2 M	+1.5 M	97.1%
Wet Handling	3rd	85.5 s	84.6 s	+0.9 s	98.95%
Wet Circle	5th	0.802 m/s	0.841 m/s	-0.04 m/s	95.36%
Straight Aqua	6th	71.5 Km/H	76.7 Km/H	-5.2 Km/H	93.22%
Curved Aquaplaning	7th	2.28 m/sec2	2.98 m/sec2	-0.7 m/sec2	76.51%

Comfort

99.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	7 Points			100%
Noise	3rd	63.9 dB	63.4 dB	+0.5 dB	99.22%

Value

100%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	1st	5.48 kg / t			100%

Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £107.99 Results Table Test Charts

4^th

Bridgestone Turanza T005

205/55 R16

• EU Label: A/A/
• Origin: Hungary
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 437.00

The Bridgestone Turanza T005, despite being a model being phased out of the market, delivers solid performance across most test categories. It particularly excels in aquaplaning resistance, winning the curved aquaplaning test with 2.98 m/sec² and placing second in straight aquaplaning. The Bridgestone also scores well in subjective dry handling assessment (second place with 6.9 points), showing good driver feedback and precision. Its main weaknesses appear in wet braking (sixth place at 54.2 meters) and external noise (last place at 66.8 dB). With respectable rolling resistance and good dry handling characteristics, the Turanza T005 demonstrates why it was a successful premium tyre, though its balanced but not class-leading performance in most categories explains its tied fourth-place finish despite its premium pricing (€437).

Dry

97.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	6th	37.9 M	36.1 M	+1.8 M	95.25%
Dry Handling	4th	53 s	52.5 s	+0.5 s	99.06%
Subj. Dry Handling	2nd	6.9 Points	7.1 Points	-0.2 Points	97.18%

Wet

96.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	6th	54.2 M	50.2 M	+4 M	92.62%
Wet Handling	6th	86.9 s	84.6 s	+2.3 s	97.35%
Wet Circle	3rd	0.817 m/s	0.841 m/s	-0.02 m/s	97.15%
Straight Aqua	2nd	74.5 Km/H	76.7 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	97.13%
Curved Aquaplaning	1st	2.98 m/sec2			100%

Comfort

93.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	6.5 Points	7 Points	-0.5 Points	92.86%
Noise	7th	66.8 dB	63.4 dB	+3.4 dB	94.91%

Value

90.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	4th	6.08 kg / t	5.48 kg / t	+0.6 kg / t	90.13%

Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £101.99 Results Table Test Charts

5^th

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

205/55 R16

• EU Label: A/A/
• Origin: Turkey
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 336.00

The Falken Ziex ZE310 Ecorun demonstrates the narrowing gap between mid-range and premium tyres, matching Bridgestone's overall score to tie for fourth place. The Falken particularly impresses in dry conditions, achieving second-best dry braking performance (36.3 meters) and third-place dry handling times. It delivers solid subjective handling feedback (third place) and maintains reasonable wet performance with mid-pack results across most wet categories. Its aquaplaning resistance is mixed, with good straight-line performance but below-average results in curved aquaplaning tests. With middle-of-the-pack rolling resistance and reasonable comfort scores, the Falken represents excellent value at €336 - significantly less expensive than the premium competitors while delivering comparable performance in many key categories.

Dry

97.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	2nd	36.3 M	36.1 M	+0.2 M	99.45%
Dry Handling	3rd	52.9 s	52.5 s	+0.4 s	99.24%
Subj. Dry Handling	3rd	6.7 Points	7.1 Points	-0.4 Points	94.37%

Wet

94.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	4th	53.8 M	50.2 M	+3.6 M	93.31%
Wet Handling	4th	86.1 s	84.6 s	+1.5 s	98.26%
Wet Circle	4th	0.814 m/s	0.841 m/s	-0.03 m/s	96.79%
Straight Aqua	3rd	74.3 Km/H	76.7 Km/H	-2.4 Km/H	96.87%
Curved Aquaplaning	6th	2.56 m/sec2	2.98 m/sec2	-0.42 m/sec2	85.91%

Comfort

95.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	6.5 Points	7 Points	-0.5 Points	92.86%
Noise	5th	65 dB	63.4 dB	+1.6 dB	97.54%

Value

86.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	5th	6.35 kg / t	5.48 kg / t	+0.87 kg / t	86.3%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

6^th

Nexen N Blue S

205/55 R16

• EU Label: A/A/
• Origin: South Korea
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 253.00

The Nexen N'Blue S proves to be a cost-effective option with some standout performance characteristics. Most notably, it dominates the straight aquaplaning test with a significantly higher float speed (76.7 km/h) than its competitors and places second in curved aquaplaning resistance. The tyre also features good efficiency with the third-best rolling resistance result (6.04 kg/t). However, the Nexen shows clear compromises in subjective assessments, ranking last in subjective dry handling feel (5.7 points). Its wet and dry braking performances are adequate but unexceptional, placing mid-pack. At €253, the N'Blue S represents the best value option in the test for price-conscious buyers, particularly those in rainy climates where its excellent aquaplaning resistance would be beneficial, though its handling feel limitations are evident compared to premium offerings.

Dry

91.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	5th	37.6 M	36.1 M	+1.5 M	96.01%
Dry Handling	5th	53.2 s	52.5 s	+0.7 s	98.68%
Subj. Dry Handling	7th	5.7 Points	7.1 Points	-1.4 Points	80.28%

Wet

96.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	5th	53.9 M	50.2 M	+3.7 M	93.14%
Wet Handling	5th	86.5 s	84.6 s	+1.9 s	97.8%
Wet Circle	6th	0.801 m/s	0.841 m/s	-0.04 m/s	95.24%
Straight Aqua	1st	76.7 Km/H			100%
Curved Aquaplaning	2nd	2.89 m/sec2	2.98 m/sec2	-0.09 m/sec2	96.98%

Comfort

95.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	6.5 Points	7 Points	-0.5 Points	92.86%
Noise	6th	65.2 dB	63.4 dB	+1.8 dB	97.24%

Value

90.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	3rd	6.04 kg / t	5.48 kg / t	+0.56 kg / t	90.73%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

7^th

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

205/55 R16

• EU Label: A/B/
• Origin: China
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 321.00

The Prinx XLAB Comfort EV significantly underperforms across most test categories, raising serious safety concerns particularly in wet conditions. Its wet braking distance (68.7 meters) is nearly 37% longer than the test-winning Continental, representing a potentially dangerous performance deficit. The Chinese tyre also records the slowest wet handling time (94 seconds) and poorest wet circle grip. Despite its "Comfort EV" naming suggesting energy efficiency, it ironically delivers the worst rolling resistance result (6.81 kg/t). The Prinx also falls short in dry performance with the longest dry braking distance and slowest handling time. Its only decent result comes in noise testing, where it places mid-pack. Given its price point (€321) exceeding both the Falken and Nexen while delivering substantially worse performance, the Prinx XLAB Comfort EV cannot be recommended despite its "B" EU wet grip rating.

Dry

91.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	7th	39.5 M	36.1 M	+3.4 M	91.39%
Dry Handling	7th	53.6 s	52.5 s	+1.1 s	97.95%
Subj. Dry Handling	6th	6 Points	7.1 Points	-1.1 Points	84.51%

Wet

87.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	7th	68.7 M	50.2 M	+18.5 M	73.07%
Wet Handling	7th	94 s	84.6 s	+9.4 s	90%
Wet Circle	7th	0.755 m/s	0.841 m/s	-0.09 m/s	89.77%
Straight Aqua	7th	71.1 Km/H	76.7 Km/H	-5.6 Km/H	92.7%
Curved Aquaplaning	5th	2.72 m/sec2	2.98 m/sec2	-0.26 m/sec2	91.28%

Comfort

92.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	7th	6 Points	7 Points	-1 Points	85.71%
Noise	4th	64.1 dB	63.4 dB	+0.7 dB	98.91%

Value

80.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	7th	6.81 kg / t	5.48 kg / t	+1.33 kg / t	80.47%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts