Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
245/45 R19
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
16
Test vehicle
BMW 5 Series

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
35 m -7.20 m 0 km/h
42.2 m Best 0 km/h
42.5 m +0.30 m 11 km/h
42.8 m +0.60 m 15 km/h
43.7 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
43.7 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
44 m +1.80 m 26 km/h
44 m +1.80 m 26 km/h
44.2 m +2.00 m 28 km/h
44.5 m +2.30 m 30 km/h
44.7 m +2.50 m 31 km/h
44.7 m +2.50 m 31 km/h
44.8 m +2.60 m 31 km/h
45.1 m +2.90 m 33 km/h
45.8 m +3.60 m 36 km/h
45.9 m +3.70 m 37 km/h
46.3 m +4.10 m 39 km/h
46.3 m +4.10 m 39 km/h
46.8 m +4.60 m 41 km/h
47.2 m +5.00 m 42 km/h
47.2 m +5.00 m 42 km/h
RefReference Budget
47.6 m +5.40 m 44 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 36% (12.6 m ≈ 2.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Semperit Speed Grip 5 would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
113.7 km/h +2.00 km/h
111.7 km/h Best
111.7 km/h Best
111.6 km/h -0.10 km/h
111.4 km/h -0.30 km/h
110.9 km/h -0.80 km/h
110.8 km/h -0.90 km/h
110.7 km/h -1.00 km/h
110.6 km/h -1.10 km/h
110.5 km/h -1.20 km/h
110.5 km/h -1.20 km/h
110.4 km/h -1.30 km/h
110.3 km/h -1.40 km/h
110.2 km/h -1.50 km/h
110.2 km/h -1.50 km/h
110.1 km/h -1.60 km/h
109.8 km/h -1.90 km/h
109.5 km/h -2.20 km/h
109.2 km/h -2.50 km/h
108.6 km/h -3.10 km/h
108.3 km/h -3.40 km/h
RefReference Budget
106.9 km/h -4.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6% (6.8 Km/H).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
51.6 m Best 0 km/h
53 m +1.40 m 21 km/h
56.1 m +4.50 m 37 km/h
56.8 m +5.20 m 39 km/h
RefReference Summer
57.3 m +5.70 m 41 km/h
58.4 m +6.80 m 44 km/h
58.7 m +7.10 m 45 km/h
59.3 m +7.70 m 47 km/h
59.3 m +7.70 m 47 km/h
59.4 m +7.80 m 47 km/h
59.8 m +8.20 m 48 km/h
59.9 m +8.30 m 48 km/h
59.9 m +8.30 m 48 km/h
59.9 m +8.30 m 48 km/h
60.7 m +9.10 m 50 km/h
61.2 m +9.60 m 51 km/h
61.2 m +9.60 m 51 km/h
61.5 m +9.90 m 52 km/h
62.5 m +10.90 m 54 km/h
63.1 m +11.50 m 55 km/h
64.1 m +12.50 m 57 km/h
RefReference Budget
79.1 m +27.50 m 77 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 53.3% (27.5 m ≈ 6.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 would still be travelling at 57 km/h when the Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
83.4 km/h +0.60 km/h
82.8 km/h Best
82.7 km/h -0.10 km/h
82.1 km/h -0.70 km/h
82 km/h -0.80 km/h
81.8 km/h -1.00 km/h
80.9 km/h -1.90 km/h
79.7 km/h -3.10 km/h
79.5 km/h -3.30 km/h
78.8 km/h -4.00 km/h
78.6 km/h -4.20 km/h
78.6 km/h -4.20 km/h
78.5 km/h -4.30 km/h
78.4 km/h -4.40 km/h
78.3 km/h -4.50 km/h
78.1 km/h -4.70 km/h
77.8 km/h -5.00 km/h
77.6 km/h -5.20 km/h
77.1 km/h -5.70 km/h
76.8 km/h -6.00 km/h
76.4 km/h -6.40 km/h
RefReference Budget
67.9 km/h -14.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 18.6% (15.5 Km/H).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
11.59 s -0.55 s
12.14 s Best
12.29 s +0.15 s
12.38 s +0.24 s
12.5 s +0.36 s
12.51 s +0.37 s
12.53 s +0.39 s
12.54 s +0.40 s
12.56 s +0.42 s
12.56 s +0.42 s
12.62 s +0.48 s
12.63 s +0.49 s
12.63 s +0.49 s
12.68 s +0.54 s
12.69 s +0.55 s
12.7 s +0.56 s
12.78 s +0.64 s
12.81 s +0.67 s
12.83 s +0.69 s
12.85 s +0.71 s
12.89 s +0.75 s
RefReference Budget
14.54 s +2.40 s

The difference between best and worst was 25.5% (2.95 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
93.9 km/h +0.30 km/h
93.6 km/h Best
93.5 km/h -0.10 km/h
92.7 km/h -0.90 km/h
92.6 km/h -1.00 km/h
92.5 km/h -1.10 km/h
92 km/h -1.60 km/h
91.6 km/h -2.00 km/h
91.4 km/h -2.20 km/h
90.8 km/h -2.80 km/h
90.7 km/h -2.90 km/h
90.5 km/h -3.10 km/h
90.2 km/h -3.40 km/h
90 km/h -3.60 km/h
89.9 km/h -3.70 km/h
89.5 km/h -4.10 km/h
89.4 km/h -4.20 km/h
89.2 km/h -4.40 km/h
89.1 km/h -4.50 km/h
89 km/h -4.60 km/h
88 km/h -5.60 km/h
RefReference Budget
81.1 km/h -12.50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 13.6% (12.8 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
3.25 m/sec2 +0.39 m/sec2
2.86 m/sec2 Best
2.83 m/sec2 -0.03 m/sec2
2.81 m/sec2 -0.05 m/sec2
2.76 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
2.76 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
2.74 m/sec2 -0.12 m/sec2
2.73 m/sec2 -0.13 m/sec2
2.67 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
2.65 m/sec2 -0.21 m/sec2
2.65 m/sec2 -0.21 m/sec2
2.61 m/sec2 -0.25 m/sec2
2.52 m/sec2 -0.34 m/sec2
2.46 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
2.46 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
2.45 m/sec2 -0.41 m/sec2
2.36 m/sec2 -0.50 m/sec2
2.31 m/sec2 -0.55 m/sec2
2.31 m/sec2 -0.55 m/sec2
2.29 m/sec2 -0.57 m/sec2
2.23 m/sec2 -0.63 m/sec2
RefReference Budget
1.55 m/sec2 -1.31 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 52.3% (1.7 m/sec2).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
28.9 m Best 0 km/h
29 m +0.10 m 8 km/h
29.1 m +0.20 m 11 km/h
29.1 m +0.20 m 11 km/h
29.1 m +0.20 m 11 km/h
29.1 m +0.20 m 11 km/h
29.2 m +0.30 m 13 km/h
29.2 m +0.30 m 13 km/h
29.2 m +0.30 m 13 km/h
29.3 m +0.40 m 15 km/h
29.3 m +0.40 m 15 km/h
29.4 m +0.50 m 17 km/h
29.4 m +0.50 m 17 km/h
29.5 m +0.60 m 19 km/h
29.5 m +0.60 m 19 km/h
RefReference Budget
29.6 m +0.70 m 20 km/h
29.6 m +0.70 m 20 km/h
29.8 m +0.90 m 23 km/h
29.8 m +0.90 m 23 km/h
29.9 m +1.00 m 24 km/h
30.1 m +1.20 m 26 km/h
RefReference Summer
44.4 m +15.50 m 77 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 53.6% (15.5 m ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Lassa Competus Winter 2+ would still be travelling at 26 km/h when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
5379 N Best
5376 N -3.00 N
5316 N -63.00 N
5279 N -100.00 N
5256 N -123.00 N
5252 N -127.00 N
5243 N -136.00 N
5236 N -143.00 N
5230 N -149.00 N
5220 N -159.00 N
RefReference Budget
5178 N -201.00 N
5167 N -212.00 N
5149 N -230.00 N
5123 N -256.00 N
5122 N -257.00 N
5086 N -293.00 N
5067 N -312.00 N
5066 N -313.00 N
5063 N -316.00 N
5036 N -343.00 N
4982 N -397.00 N
RefReference Summer
2524 N -2,855.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 53.1% (2,855 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
57.9 km/h Best
57.9 km/h Best
57.8 km/h -0.10 km/h
57.7 km/h -0.20 km/h
57.5 km/h -0.40 km/h
57.1 km/h -0.80 km/h
RefReference Budget
56.9 km/h -1.00 km/h
56.9 km/h -1.00 km/h
56.8 km/h -1.10 km/h
56.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
56.4 km/h -1.50 km/h
56.3 km/h -1.60 km/h
56.2 km/h -1.70 km/h
56.1 km/h -1.80 km/h
56.1 km/h -1.80 km/h
54.7 km/h -3.20 km/h
54.7 km/h -3.20 km/h
54.3 km/h -3.60 km/h
54.3 km/h -3.60 km/h
54.2 km/h -3.70 km/h
53.7 km/h -4.20 km/h
RefReference Summer
28.6 km/h -29.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 50.6% (29.3 Km/H).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.49 m/sec2 Best
3.47 m/sec2 -0.02 m/sec2
3.46 m/sec2 -0.03 m/sec2
3.45 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.45 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.45 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.45 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.45 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.44 m/sec2 -0.05 m/sec2
3.42 m/sec2 -0.07 m/sec2
3.41 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
3.41 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
3.41 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
3.4 m/sec2 -0.09 m/sec2
RefReference Budget
3.38 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
3.38 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
3.37 m/sec2 -0.12 m/sec2
3.34 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
3.34 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
3.32 m/sec2 -0.17 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
1.98 m/sec2 -1.51 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 43.3% (1.51 m/sec2).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TyreResultGap to best
9.8 Points Best
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
8.6 Points -1.20 Points
8.4 Points -1.40 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8 Points -1.80 Points
7.8 Points -2.00 Points
7.8 Points -2.00 Points
7.6 Points -2.20 Points
7.6 Points -2.20 Points
7.4 Points -2.40 Points
7.2 Points -2.60 Points

The difference between best and worst was 26.5% (2.6 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Budget
69.8 dB -1.20 dB
71 dB Best
71 dB Best
71.1 dB +0.10 dB
71.6 dB +0.60 dB
71.7 dB +0.70 dB
71.8 dB +0.80 dB
71.9 dB +0.90 dB
72.1 dB +1.10 dB
72.1 dB +1.10 dB
72.3 dB +1.30 dB
72.4 dB +1.40 dB
72.4 dB +1.40 dB
72.5 dB +1.50 dB
72.6 dB +1.60 dB
72.7 dB +1.70 dB
72.9 dB +1.90 dB
RefReference Summer
73 dB +2.00 dB
73.4 dB +2.40 dB
73.5 dB +2.50 dB
73.8 dB +2.80 dB
74.6 dB +3.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.9% (4.8 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
56,500 KM Best
56,300 KM -200 KM
55,550 KM -950 KM
54,700 KM -1,800 KM
54,450 KM -2,050 KM
54,300 KM -2,200 KM
53,850 KM -2,650 KM
52,350 KM -4,150 KM
52,150 KM -4,350 KM
51,600 KM -4,900 KM
51,300 KM -5,200 KM
51,000 KM -5,500 KM
48,800 KM -7,700 KM
48,700 KM -7,800 KM
48,600 KM -7,900 KM
48,150 KM -8,350 KM
47,500 KM -9,000 KM
46,250 KM -10,250 KM
46,200 KM -10,300 KM
43,500 KM -13,000 KM

The difference between best and worst was 23% (13,000 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
10.27 Price/1000 Best €14.74
11.16 Price/1000 +0.89 Price/1000 €14.51
11.42 Price/1000 +1.15 Price/1000 €13.44
12.12 Price/1000 +1.85 Price/1000 €16.56
12.8 Price/1000 +2.53 Price/1000 €18.08
13.04 Price/1000 +2.77 Price/1000 €15.48
13.81 Price/1000 +3.54 Price/1000 €16.84
14.12 Price/1000 +3.85 Price/1000 €19.77
14.25 Price/1000 +3.98 Price/1000 €15.86
14.4 Price/1000 +4.13 Price/1000 €16.30
14.5 Price/1000 +4.23 Price/1000 €19.27
14.61 Price/1000 +4.34 Price/1000 €17.04
14.86 Price/1000 +4.59 Price/1000 €16.86
15.2 Price/1000 +4.93 Price/1000 €18.76
17.05 Price/1000 +6.78 Price/1000 €19.36
17.3 Price/1000 +7.03 Price/1000 €23.55
17.57 Price/1000 +7.30 Price/1000 €19.23
18.23 Price/1000 +7.96 Price/1000 €21.88
19.3 Price/1000 +9.03 Price/1000 €22.57
20.49 Price/1000 +10.22 Price/1000 €24.54

The difference between best and worst was 99.5% (10.22 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport) works out €444 cheaper than the most expensive (Continental WinterContact TS 870 P).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.46 kg/t Best £0
7.55 kg/t +0.09 kg/t £5
7.62 kg/t +0.16 kg/t £9
7.64 kg/t +0.18 kg/t £11
7.66 kg/t +0.20 kg/t £12
7.74 kg/t +0.28 kg/t £17
7.76 kg/t +0.30 kg/t £18
7.77 kg/t +0.31 kg/t £18
7.95 kg/t +0.49 kg/t £29
7.99 kg/t +0.53 kg/t £31
8 kg/t +0.54 kg/t £32
8.06 kg/t +0.60 kg/t £35
8.14 kg/t +0.68 kg/t £40
8.2 kg/t +0.74 kg/t £44
8.34 kg/t +0.88 kg/t £52
8.35 kg/t +0.89 kg/t £53
8.38 kg/t +0.92 kg/t £54
8.59 kg/t +1.13 kg/t £67
8.67 kg/t +1.21 kg/t £71
8.8 kg/t +1.34 kg/t £79

The difference between best and worst was 18% (1.34 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ uses about 55 L (£79) more fuel than the Viking WinTech NewGen.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.