Menu
Formula Energy View Gallery (1)
165-235/45-70 R14-19 30 sizes 2012

Formula Energy

The Formula Energy is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
78%
Wet Grip
56%
Road Feedback
60%
Handling
56%
Wear
80%
Comfort
66%
Buy again
52%
5 Reviews
64% Average
47,500 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 31st)
Formula Formula Energy

Formula Formula Energy

Summer Economy
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 2
Period: 2014 - 2017
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 64%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Shootout Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 48/43 0 metrics
2016 Market Overview - Braking Test Auto Bild 2016 205/55 R16 33/50 0 metrics
2014 Auto Review Summer Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 Auto Review 2014 205/55 R16 12/16 0 metrics
3
Tests
31st
Average
12th
Best
48th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
48th/43
33rd/50
High resistance to aquaplaning
Poor grip in the wet
After Pirelli acquired two Russian tyre plants, the need arose and a new brand under which Russian refineries would be issue "second line" tyres. Formula tyres made ​​on the new equipment in Voronezh, and in the same factory also produce tyres for Pirelli. Asymmetric tyre tread Formula Energy means the Formula resists aquaplaning almost as well as Pirelli, but the wet asphalt, where the rubber composition is important, the Formula lags behind, but are good for the second line subgroup. On dry roads the performance is average, and for acoustic comfort and smoothness they are better than more expensive tyres like Nokian and Bridgestone. And in the final ranking Formula tyres are higher than Bridgestone: on one step with tyres Yokohama. The debut is a success.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
185/60R14 82 H C D 70
165/70R14 81 T D C 70
175/65R14 82 T D D 70
15 inch
195/55R15 85 V D C 71
185/65R15 88 T D D 70
185/65R15 92 H XL C D 70
195/65R15 91 V C C 71
16 inch
215/60R16 99 H XL C C 72
205/60R16 92 V C C 71
205/55R16 91 V D C 71
17 inch
215/55R17 94 W D C 71
225/50R17 98 Y XL C C 72
235/65R17 108 V XL C C 72
18 inch
235/60R18 107 V XL C C 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Formula Energy >>

Questions and Answers for the Formula Energy

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Formula Energy. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Formula Energy Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Volvo s40 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
i have those tyres for the last 2 years and for 20 k km.overall i am very satisfied.i think they are better from other much more expensive tyres
August 15, 2018
Given 41% while driving a Volvo V70 2.5 T awd (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Half worn down on a Volvo V70 and the wet grip is absolutely horrible. On fresh wet pavement, the AWD system has to kick in almost every time you accelerate quicker because they lose grip so quickly. Feels scary driving if there's water on the road, even though there's a lot of tread left and the pressures are all normal.
July 7, 2019
Given 53% while driving a Peugeot 206 1.4 75hp (175/65 R14 H) on a combination of roads for 0 miles
It is not resistant to shocks. Very weak sidewall. My bicycle tires harder.
April 19, 2016

How would you rate the Formula Energy?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Formula Energy Reviews

Given 83% while driving a Renault Clio III 1.2 55kW (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 500 average miles
Our five year old Renault Clio Sport Estate 1.2 75bhp petrol had covered only 36,000 kms since new, but the original fitment Goodyear tyres on the front were about 70 worn. The main problem was they were cracking/perishing a bit and the r/h/s front had worn on the shoulder a bit due to the number of roundabouts in fhe Treviso area. The car is driven mainly on short to medium length journeys only. The Clio does seem to be quite kind to tyres and the tracking well set up at the factory, unlike other new cars I have bought

165/65 15 is an odd size, so you are automatically restricted on your choice. A large tyre centre offered us Pirellis or Formula brand which we were told is a subsidisry of Pirelli and made in Europe. Tyres are a rip off in Italy as unlike France or the UK, there seems to be a resistence to an Internet sourced tyre supplier being started. So comparable tyres for the Clio were about 30% more each than what I would have paid via AlloPneus in France.

The Formula Energy tyres were €145 for two balanced and fitted.

The precious Goodyears were not very grippy in the wet, and the day the Formula tyres were fitted the weather was terrible with a lot of water streaming across the roads and pooling too. Driving around the same roundabouts and other stretches of road the Formula tyres demonstrated good grip in the slippery conditions where the Goodyears would have let go. Aquaplaning resistance was excellent too as the tyres cut through standing water.

The Formula tyres have an asymetric tread and look really good. They are much quieter running than the Goodyears obviously because they are new and have more rubber, but also because the tread pattern consists of two deep sipes to disperse water and a continuous type pattern rather than a block type. I also noticed that directional stability was improved with these tyres, and the car responded more enthusiastically to steering inputs.

Long term I am not too concerned about wear as we cover so few kilometres, but for the money if you do not have a high performance car, these tyres are to be recommended.
August 21, 2015
Rate the Formula Energy