Michelin Primacy 4 Reviews - Page 13
Given 94%
while driving a
Volkswagen Passat 2.0TDI
(225/45 R17)
on mostly country roads
for 5,000 spirited miles
For normal, but fast driving in a normal car it is a great tyre. Don't be fooled by those who say it feels slippery, it lacks grip etc. It feels superb, it is suprisingly quiet and grips well. For all normal cars it is great and for those who want comfort and safety. Braking is also exeptional.Exeeded my expectations, recomend to everyone.
Given 92%
while driving a
Kia Motors Forte
(205/55 R16)
on mostly motorways
for 30 average miles
Just bought the Primacy 4 tyres yesterday. This morning nearly ended in a chain car collision at the expressway and fortunately, Primacy 4 short braking distance plus firm stick to ground save me from getting into the car accident. Superb braking effect and will definitely chose and stay to use this Primacy 4 continuously. Last tyre PS4 but noisy on the road, Primacy 4 is quiet, good and value for money.
Given 93%
while driving a
Audi A3 Sportback
(205/55 R16 V)
on a combination of roads
for 2,500 average miles
I own an Audi A3 Sportback at 105.000km, have bought this tyres 3 months ago and been using them for almost 4.000 km's. I used Pirelli Cinturato P7, Bridgestone ER 300 and Conti PC5 before. When I bought this tyres, I was not expecting that much quietness. It takes away the road feedback (feels like the tyres are levitating) and gives comfort instead. I like to drive in a comfortable car, but I tried this tyres on almost any type of road and in their edges. Good news are they can handle pretty well on hard bends with an above average speed. Wet and dry grip is also unexpectingly good. Break lenght is significantly low compared to my previous tyres. These are not performance tyres but I believe they are the best touring tyres in the market right now.
Given 71%
while driving a
(235/55 R17)
on mostly motorways
for 6,500 average miles
On a Volvo XC70 2012 the tires feel a bit more slippery have less grip than the Continental Wintercontact i fitted for the winter.
Accellerating from standstill the tires somethimes slip, which i didnt have with the conti's.
In the wet, even extreem wet with 15cm of water the tires handled well, no aquaplanning or los of control. Only with extreem conrering you feel the tires looking for grip a bit.
Driving these tires is fine they have a exact sweet spot regarding presure towards confort and handling, deviating from 2.5 bar on my car means les handling and confort, the tires seem to loose more presure over time then I'm used to.
We have driven 10K km with them now. The wear of the tires in this time is less then 0,2mm giving confedence on the wear and tear of the tires. The question that arises is if the durability of the tires influences thier handeling.
Accellerating from standstill the tires somethimes slip, which i didnt have with the conti's.
In the wet, even extreem wet with 15cm of water the tires handled well, no aquaplanning or los of control. Only with extreem conrering you feel the tires looking for grip a bit.
Driving these tires is fine they have a exact sweet spot regarding presure towards confort and handling, deviating from 2.5 bar on my car means les handling and confort, the tires seem to loose more presure over time then I'm used to.
We have driven 10K km with them now. The wear of the tires in this time is less then 0,2mm giving confedence on the wear and tear of the tires. The question that arises is if the durability of the tires influences thier handeling.
Given 82%
while driving a
Saab Automobile 9 5 NG 2,0t Biopower
(225/55 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 200 miles
First impresion was a noticable lower level of roadnoise compared to my old tyres. Michelin Primacy SP.
I am a comfort and not a sport driver.
And for me they suit very well.
The feeling from the road is at a slightly lower level than the old ones.
But the car runs very stable and smoth.
But I have noticed that they are very happy to pick up small rocks from the road and tumble them around in the wheelhouse.
It is the outer edges of the tyres that is responsible.
Btw. I live in Sweden where we have a different asphalt than in most other European countries.
Not smoth.
All in all.
So far I like the tyres and they have made my car more comfortable.....
I am a comfort and not a sport driver.
And for me they suit very well.
The feeling from the road is at a slightly lower level than the old ones.
But the car runs very stable and smoth.
But I have noticed that they are very happy to pick up small rocks from the road and tumble them around in the wheelhouse.
It is the outer edges of the tyres that is responsible.
Btw. I live in Sweden where we have a different asphalt than in most other European countries.
Not smoth.
All in all.
So far I like the tyres and they have made my car more comfortable.....
Given 79%
while driving a
BMW 520i
(225/55 R17 W)
on mostly motorways
for 1,000 average miles
I have BMW 5 Series F10, I had Bridgestone Potenza Er300 RFT tyres at 21000Km. When I was breaking a bit hard on pedal ABS was kicking in instantly. Then I bought a set of Michelin Primacy 4 (225/55/r17) non run flat tyres. I like P4 because it is quite, well handling and breaking compare to Potenza.
When I am driving at higher speeds tires gives me confidence.
I would buy it again.
When I am driving at higher speeds tires gives me confidence.
I would buy it again.
Given 100%
while driving a
Mazda 3 2005
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 5,000 average miles
excelent tyre
Given 57%
while driving a
Audi A4
(225/50 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 1,200 spirited miles
I have only had them for a few weeks and I kind of regret this purchase.
This is definitely not a sport-tire, average good grip and braking in wet and dry, average good handling and response, average comfort and noise level, nothing really bad but also nothing really good.
I don't really feel connected to the road with these tires, there's a strange numbness and distance, I do not like it.
My OEM tires had better handling, response and feel, better direction stability, about the same comfort and noise level.
I can't see any reason to recommend these tires, there are better and certainly more value with other brands, I'm not impressed, I'm a little numb as the tires are.
This is definitely not a sport-tire, average good grip and braking in wet and dry, average good handling and response, average comfort and noise level, nothing really bad but also nothing really good.
I don't really feel connected to the road with these tires, there's a strange numbness and distance, I do not like it.
My OEM tires had better handling, response and feel, better direction stability, about the same comfort and noise level.
I can't see any reason to recommend these tires, there are better and certainly more value with other brands, I'm not impressed, I'm a little numb as the tires are.
Given 68%
while driving a
Ford Mondeo
(235/45 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 0 average miles
This are actually the most unimpressive tires I ever had if I have to honest.
They are replacing the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 which were the best ever, but for the first 10k miles only then the driving experience was declining with every months. Before the PS4 I had PS3 and before that Bridgestone – the OEM.
I decided to give the Primacy 4 a chance as they were highly rated as very good all-rounder, but on the higher price range due to the constant performance for the duration of their life. When installed I felt no different compared to my winter tires, and nothing like the PS4. Handling is normal, grip is ok, noise is ok, braking is good, and they feel a bit soft in the corners – everything you expect form a nonperformance tire.
They bring no emotion at all – just average. Now I'll be waiting to see if they will last 10k miles longer compared to others as promised.
My recommendation: if you bet on Michelin – go with the PS4 for about 20% more $.
If not get something cheaper – I just dot see the value for money in Primacy 4 just yet.
They are replacing the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 which were the best ever, but for the first 10k miles only then the driving experience was declining with every months. Before the PS4 I had PS3 and before that Bridgestone – the OEM.
I decided to give the Primacy 4 a chance as they were highly rated as very good all-rounder, but on the higher price range due to the constant performance for the duration of their life. When installed I felt no different compared to my winter tires, and nothing like the PS4. Handling is normal, grip is ok, noise is ok, braking is good, and they feel a bit soft in the corners – everything you expect form a nonperformance tire.
They bring no emotion at all – just average. Now I'll be waiting to see if they will last 10k miles longer compared to others as promised.
My recommendation: if you bet on Michelin – go with the PS4 for about 20% more $.
If not get something cheaper – I just dot see the value for money in Primacy 4 just yet.
Given 91%
while driving a
Toyota Avensis Wagon D4D 2.2
(225/45 R17 V)
on mostly country roads
for 8,000 average miles
Energy Rating: B / A / 68dbFeedback of the First 1000Km:
- Low Noise (Low Noise), low rolling resistance, excellent adhesion in wet and dry conditions .. improved stability and comfort compared to Primacy3.
Highly Recommend - Very Close to the Perfect!
- Low Noise (Low Noise), low rolling resistance, excellent adhesion in wet and dry conditions .. improved stability and comfort compared to Primacy3.
Highly Recommend - Very Close to the Perfect!
Given 60%
while driving a
Jaguar s type 2.5
(225/55 R16 V)
on a combination of roads
for 900 average miles
It is an old car but in excellent condition with brand new Michelin Primacy 4, same standard size as always.
Good grip dry and wet and good braking dry and wet, surprisingly only acceptable comfort and noise level, reasonable handling and feel, there's a little numbness and weird instability with these tires as with the Primacy 3 but in general the P4 are good tires.
They are better than Primacy 3 which I really did not like, but my previous old favorite tire Michelin Pilot Exalto which I had for many years suited me better, better feel and better control, very stable and grippy, not perfect comfort but good enough, I just liked them old tires better.
My Dunlop Winter Contact 4 D for winter driving has better comfort and noise level, very stable and controllable, very suitable tires for this comfort car, the Michelin Primacy 4 not so much, it is not bad tires but nothing special and I prefer the old tires I had before.
I have made another review about Nexen N Blue HD Plus.
Good grip dry and wet and good braking dry and wet, surprisingly only acceptable comfort and noise level, reasonable handling and feel, there's a little numbness and weird instability with these tires as with the Primacy 3 but in general the P4 are good tires.
They are better than Primacy 3 which I really did not like, but my previous old favorite tire Michelin Pilot Exalto which I had for many years suited me better, better feel and better control, very stable and grippy, not perfect comfort but good enough, I just liked them old tires better.
My Dunlop Winter Contact 4 D for winter driving has better comfort and noise level, very stable and controllable, very suitable tires for this comfort car, the Michelin Primacy 4 not so much, it is not bad tires but nothing special and I prefer the old tires I had before.
I have made another review about Nexen N Blue HD Plus.
Given 60%
while driving a
Mercedes Benz C280 sport
(205/55 R16 V)
on a combination of roads
for 1,200 average miles
It is the same standard size as I always have used.
For many years I have used Uniroyal MS Plus 66 on this well maintained car and nothing ells, very comfortable on any type of road and very quiet, also very stable in straights, although slightly slippery and soft in fast turns I felt good control and confidence in them, the grip was good enough for this car and very easy to control.
The grip with the harder, less comfortable and noisier, brand new Primacy 4 in turns are of course indeed faster, firmer, sharper and better, but on the limits they are chewing their way until they sometimes abruptly slip, especially on poor roads.
The Michelin's do have more feel to the road, the reaction and handling is faster, the Michelin's communicate better but it is surprisingly not a huge difference and no reason to be overexcited about, I had expected a more upgraded handling vs the Uniroyal's.
Better braking dry and wet, but again surprisingly not a huge difference.
In straights, while the soft Uniroyal's are completely planted on the road, the harder and firmer Michelin's are a little spongy and unstable, I do not understand why, it should normally be otherwise.
The Michelin's give me the impression that they roll easier, probably less resistance and consequently probably less fuel consumption.
Good in rain, maybe the Uniroyal's were slightly better in deep water-puddles.
Michelin's benefits are not worth the disadvantages on this car, in fact that is why I stayed on the Uniroyal's for so many years after I had Michelin HP's, I wish I had remembered that before I bought the Primacy 4.
With the exception of driving on poor roads, the Michelin's are not bad in any way, they are actually pretty good and better than the mediocre Primacy 3 but they do not suit this car and what I want.
For many years I have used Uniroyal MS Plus 66 on this well maintained car and nothing ells, very comfortable on any type of road and very quiet, also very stable in straights, although slightly slippery and soft in fast turns I felt good control and confidence in them, the grip was good enough for this car and very easy to control.
The grip with the harder, less comfortable and noisier, brand new Primacy 4 in turns are of course indeed faster, firmer, sharper and better, but on the limits they are chewing their way until they sometimes abruptly slip, especially on poor roads.
The Michelin's do have more feel to the road, the reaction and handling is faster, the Michelin's communicate better but it is surprisingly not a huge difference and no reason to be overexcited about, I had expected a more upgraded handling vs the Uniroyal's.
Better braking dry and wet, but again surprisingly not a huge difference.
In straights, while the soft Uniroyal's are completely planted on the road, the harder and firmer Michelin's are a little spongy and unstable, I do not understand why, it should normally be otherwise.
The Michelin's give me the impression that they roll easier, probably less resistance and consequently probably less fuel consumption.
Good in rain, maybe the Uniroyal's were slightly better in deep water-puddles.
Michelin's benefits are not worth the disadvantages on this car, in fact that is why I stayed on the Uniroyal's for so many years after I had Michelin HP's, I wish I had remembered that before I bought the Primacy 4.
With the exception of driving on poor roads, the Michelin's are not bad in any way, they are actually pretty good and better than the mediocre Primacy 3 but they do not suit this car and what I want.